Literature DB >> 32739051

Psychological Influence of Coronovirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on the General Public, Medical Workers, and Patients With Mental Disorders and its Countermeasures.

Sanwang Wang1, Xin Wen2, Yingying Dong1, Bin Liu3, Minghu Cui4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronovirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first broke out in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in 2019, and now it spreads in more than 100 countries around the world. On January 30th, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a public health emergency of international concern. It was classified as a pandemic by the WHO on March 11, 2020. With the increase in the number of cases reported by various countries every day, the COVID-19 pandemic has attracted more and more attention around the world. At the same time, this public health emergency has caused a variety of psychological problems, such as panic disorder, anxiety, and depression. In addition, the Wuhan Mental Health Center's analysis of 2144 calls from the psychological hotline from February 4 to February 20, 2020, showed that the general public accounted for 70%, medical workers accounted for 2.2%, patients with mental disorders accounted for 19.5%, and other personnel accounted for 8.3% (https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/kmff1vnaLsT2d9xQkK5pwg).
CONCLUSION: Therefore, while controlling the pandemic, the government should also pay attention to the mental health of the general public, medical workers, and patients with mental disorders. Community mental health service systems, online mental health services, telemedicine, and other measures for patients with mental disorders may play a vital role during the pandemic.
Copyright © 2020 Binzhou Medical University Hospital. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; anxiety; community mental health services; mental health; online mental health services; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32739051      PMCID: PMC7255244          DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2020.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosomatics        ISSN: 0033-3182            Impact factor:   2.386


Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first broke out in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in 2019; it was caused by 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection. COVID-19 spread in China from December 2019 to early 2020 and is now spreading in more than 100 countries around the world. On January 30th, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a public health emergency of international concern. It was classified as a pandemic by the WHO on March 11, 2020. This is another major pandemic since severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003. China defines it as a class B infectious disease and takes measures to prevent and control class A infectious diseases. According to the announcement of the National Health Commission of China (https://news.qq.com//zt2020/page/feiyan.htm), as of April 3, 2020, COVID-19 had claimed 3331 lives in China, resulting in a total of 51,667 deaths worldwide. Among them, 61 Chinese medical workers were killed in different positions (https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/ivJZZv-cAyxBO_5otNH_UQ). Some died because they were on the front line and were infected with COVID-19. Some died because of days of work and overwork in the fight against the pandemic, and some died accidentally during the antipandemic period (Table 1 ). To control the spread of COVID-19 and to provide first aid for critically ill patients, central and local authorities have taken several effective measures, such as the establishment of emergency infectious disease hospitals and quarantine facilities to isolate suspected and diagnosed patients and their close contacts. As countries report the number of new cases every day, the COVID-19 pandemic has attracted more and more attention around the world. New mental symptoms may occur in people without mental illness or the condition of those with preexisting mental illness may be aggravated and cause suffering to caregivers of affected individuals. General public, medical workers, and patients with mental disorders are under insurmountable psychological pressure, which may lead to a variety of psychological problems.
Table 1

Statistics of Death of Medical Personnel During COVID-19 by April 3, 2020

CategoryNumber (n = 61)Percent (%)
Gender
 Male5081.97
 Female1118.03
Age
 Less than or equal to 40 y1931.15
 41–50 y (contain 50 y)1626.23
 51–60 y (contain 60 y)1524.59
 Less than 60 y1016.39
 Unknown11.64
Cause of death
 Pneumonia1931.15
 Overwork (including cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, and other nonconfirmed diseases) accident (including car accidents, hotel collapses, accidental illness, and so on)3455.74
Date
 January813.11
 February3760.66
 March1626.23
 April00
Statistics of Death of Medical Personnel During COVID-19 by April 3, 2020 Psychological Influence of COVID-19 on the General Public and Medical Workers and its Countermeasures Suggestions on Technological Implementation During COVID-19

The Psychological Influence of COVID-19 on the General Public and its Countermeasures

As a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, COVID-19 has the characteristics of strong infectivity and rapid spread, as well as the limitations of the public's cognition of COVID-19 (Table 2). The overwhelming news related to the pandemic, the cognitive bias of this emergency, and other reasons caused public anxiety and fear and other emotions. In addition, increased loneliness and reduced social interaction, as well as caused uncertainty about the future, may cause or exacerbate fear, depression, and anxiety among the general public. Even a mild illness with symptoms similar to COVID-19, such as the common cold, will cause a persistent state of anxiety. A study conducted a large-scale nationwide survey of the psychological distress of the general population in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study received a total of 52,730 valid responses from 36 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, as well as Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan. The results show that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused a variety of psychological problems, such as panic disorder, anxiety, and depression. Another study surveyed the psychological status of 1210 respondents in China at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results showed that more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate to severe, about one-third of the respondents reported moderate to severe anxiety, and 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms. Therefore, the psychological state of the public during the pandemic is very important. Timely provision of appropriate mental health care is essential. To reduce the impact of these negative emotions, the National Health Commission of the people's Republic of China issued guidelines for psychological crisis intervention and psychological adjustment during COVID-19 outbreak (China National Health Commission) on January 26, 2020. The public can also do so by limiting sources of stress (only looking at official information and limiting time), breaking isolation (strengthening communication with friends, family, and loved ones), maintaining a regular schedule (extra money for physical exercise), focusing on the benefits of isolation (quarantine protects both themselves and others and can quickly end the pandemic), and seek the help of professional psychiatrists. , , With reference to a series of psychosocial reactions caused by previous outbreaks of infectious diseases, in the current social environment, our focus on the pandemic should be on the individual level, focusing on enhancing individuals' psychological response to society, obtaining psychological help, timely self-counseling, and participation in society activities. Comparitively, in a cross-sectional study in China, where the COVID-19 pandemic initially occurred, most of the 6910 participants were optimistic about the COVID-19 pandemic: 90.8% believed that COVID-19 would eventually be successfully controlled, and 97.1% were confident that China would win the battle against the virus.
Table 2

Psychological Influence of COVID-19 on the General Public and Medical Workers and its Countermeasures

CategoryPsychological influenceCountermeasures
General publicDepression, anxiety, panic disorderLimit the sources of stressBreak the isolationKeep a regular scheduleFocus on the benefits of isolationSeek the help of professional psychiatristsSelf-counseling and participation in society
Medical workersDepression, anxiety, insomnia, traumatic disorder (The probability of anxiety and depression of front-line medical staff in respiratory department, emergency department, intensive care unit, and infection department is twice as high as that of nonclinical medical staff.)Clinical psychological intervention for medical workersThe government should provide basic materials and supplies, security, and work subsidies for front-line medical staff and their familiesAdjust sleep disorders of medical workersEstablish and encourage communication between medical workers and their families

The Psychological Influence of COVID-19 on the Medical Workers and its Countermeasures

The outbreak of COVID-19 not only causes psychological disturbance to the general population but also has a great impact on the mental health of the medical population (Table 2). Front-line health care workers, especially those in Wuhan, experience close contact with infected patients, overloaded work, lack of protective materials, death of managed patients, fear of infection, and fear of transmission to family and friends. In addition to physical exhaustion, they also suffer from great psychological pressure. , Studies have shown that patients suspected or diagnosed with COVID-19, close contacts, and front-line health professionals all have a high risk of mental health problems.At the beginning of the pandemic, a psychological survey of 994 medical workers in Wuhan showed that 36.9% had subthreshold mental health disorder (patient health questionnaire [PHQ]-9: 2.4), 34.4% had a mild disorder (PHQ-9: 5.4), 22.4% had moderate disorder (PHQ-9: 9.0), and 6.2% had a severe disorder (PHQ-9: 15.1). In another cross-sectional study, a survey of 1257 health care workers in 34 hospitals in many regions of China found that half of the respondents had mild depression and one-third had insomnia. About 14% of doctors and nearly 16% of nurses showed moderate or severe depressive symptoms, among which nurses, women, front-line staff, and Wuhan staff showed more serious symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress. Recent studies have reported that in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, it has brought not only major challenges to health systems around the world but also a lot of mental stress and work pressure to medical workers. It is possible to promote the occurrence of mental disorders such as anxiety, depression, or trauma disorders of medical workers and summarize the methods to alleviate the psychological pressure of medical workers. , Other studies have shown that medical workers show more fear, anxiety, and depression than administrators. The probability of anxiety and depression of front-line medical staff in respiratory departments, emergency departments, intensive care units, and infection departments is twice as high as that of nonclinical medical staff. Similarly, stress, anxiety, depression, and overall stress levels were detected among health professionals in the context of previous severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreaks.20, 21, 22 During a 3-year follow-up after the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, 23% of health care workers reported moderate or more severe depressive symptoms. To alleviate the psychological pressure on front-line medical staff and infected patients in Wuhan and other areas, the People's Hospital of Wuhan University and Wuhan Mental Health Center have set up psychological intervention teams composed of 4 groups of medical staff. The psychological intervention team includes the psychosocial response team (composed of hospital managers and press officials to coordinate the work and publicity tasks of the management group), the psychological intervention technical support group (composed of senior psychological intervention experts responsible for formulating psychological intervention materials and rules and providing technical guidance and supervision), psychiatrist-based psychological intervention medical team (participating in clinical psychological intervention for medical staff and patients), and the psychological assistance hotline team (made up of volunteers trained in psychological assistance to deal with the 2019-nCoV pandemic) who provide telephone guidance and help deal with mental health problems. Hundreds of medical staff have responded well to these interventions, and their services are expanding to more people and hospitals. In addition, the government should provide basic materials and supplies, security, and work subsidies for front-line medical staff and their families. Adjusting sleep disorders of medical staff and establishing and encouraging communication between medical staff and their families are of great help to alleviate their psychological pressure.

The Psychological Influence of COVID-19 on the Patients With Mental Disorders

In addition to medical workers and the general public, mental health services for patients with mental disorders are also facing great challenges. According to a report in China Newsweek on February 8, 2020, at least 50 inpatients with mental disorders and 30 mental health professionals in a large mental hospital in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, were diagnosed with COVID-19. On February 18, 2020, China's National Health Commission reported that 323 patients with severe mental disorders were diagnosed as COVID-19, and 43 were suspected of suffering from COVID-19, mainly in Wuhan. The first COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea occurred in a local psychiatric ward. One hundred and two of the 103 patients in the psychiatric ward were infected. The Italian Society of Epidemiological Psychiatry urgently issued guidelines for emergency operation of COVID-19 (patients), saying that providing services to people with mental illness is a public health responsibility. A cross-sectional epidemiological study showed that the weighted prevalence rate of mental disorders (excluding dementia) in China was 9.3% (95% confidence interval: 5.4–13.3) in the 12 months before the interview and 16.6% (13.0–20.2) in the lifetime before the interview. And most mental health departments are not ready to deal with the current pandemic. , Many psychiatric patients need continuous treatment in the outpatient clinic, and many patients need to repeatedly go to the inpatient ward for long-term hospitalization. However, strict isolation measures reduce the availability of timely psychological intervention, and routine psychological counseling is difficult to carry out in the current situation. For example, most general hospitals in Hubei Province and other areas in China have reduced the number of outpatients, specialist hospitals have reduced the size of general hospitalizations, and public transport has been disrupted in many areas, which has prevented psychiatric patients from getting treatment. , Although the risk of COVID-19 transmission among individuals with mental illness is not clear, because of mental disorders, cognitive impairment, poor self-control and self-care, and lack of insight, and unhealthy lifestyles related to mental illness, they may not be able to take infection-control measures to protect themselves, so we can reasonably assume that this risk is higher than that in the general population. For example, studies have shown that such people are more likely to suffer from respiratory diseases.34, 35, 36 Second, patients with mental disorders are more likely to be affected by fear, anxiety, and depression caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in relapse or deterioration of existing mental health status. In China, most psychiatrists do not receive adequate training in the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases and lack of mental hospitals, which also limits their clinical ability to control the potential spread of COVID-19 in mental hospitals. People with mental illness also face social exclusion and stigma, which when combined with the stigma shown by COVID-positive people may lead to double stigma. The first case of COVID-19 diagnosed in Wuhan Mental Health Center was a patient with Alzheimer's disease. This patient may have been infected by foreign objects brought by his family. People with Alzheimer's disease are mostly elderly people who have difficulties in obtaining accurate information about the COVID-19 pandemic and remembering protective procedures (such as wearing masks), and lack of adequate self-quarantine measures may expose them to a higher risk of infection. In addition, we also need to pay attention to the elderly because they are vulnerable to this pandemic and receive less attention. Especially some elderly people with physical and mental diseases are more likely to be infected.

Community Mental Health Service System, Online Mental Health Service, Telemedicine, and Other Measures for Patients With Mental Disorders Play a Vital Role During the Pandemic.

Community psychological intervention and support may have a certain effect on reducing the symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety in these stress events. A Chinese health care model called the severe Mental Disorders Management and Treatment Plan is one of the largest community mental health projects in the world (Table 3). To establish community-based mental health services nationwide, the project integrates the resources of mental hospitals with existing community mental health services and trains mental health professionals in the development of personal service plans. Over the past decade, the project has provided regular maintenance treatment for millions of community patients with severe mental disorders. In addition, some articles suggest that the implementation of the following strategies in community-based health care services can better reduce the impact of the pandemic on patients with severe mental illness: (1) Considering the poverty, unstable living conditions, and cognitive impairment of patients with severe mental illness, they need to be tailored to the latest and accurate information about the pandemic; (2) Funds and policies support them to maintain healthy habits, including diet and physical activity, as well as self-management of chronic mental and physical health; (3) When making treatment plans for them, it is necessary to take into account the effects of anxiety and depression symptoms that are common during a pandemic; (4) Patients with infected mental disorders may face double stigma related to their infection and their mental health status. However, the outbreak of the pandemic found that there are still many aspects of the community mental health service system that need to be strengthened. For example, owing to complicated work procedures, heavy workload, and the lack of standardized psychiatric or clinical psychological training, community health service staff can not give patients professional psychological counseling. In addition, the number of licensed psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, and psychotherapists is still insufficient to meet the needs of patients with mental disorders. Therefore, to address these challenges, future reform of the community mental health system is necessary to rebalance the system by reallocating resources from hospital-centric services to community-based primary health care services and promote community supportive psychological interventions globally. In 2013, the World Health Assembly approved an action plan, the WHO Mental Health Action Plan for 2013–2020, with a key recommendation to transfer health services from institutions to communities.
Table 3

Suggestions on Technological Implementation During COVID-19

Technological implementationAdvantagesLimitation
Community mental health service systemReduce the risk of infectionRegular maintenance treatment is providedReduce the pressure on general hospitalsIncrease the availability of psychological interventionTailor-made the latest and accurate information and treatment plan about COVID-19The working procedure is complicatedHeavy workloadLack of standardized psychiatric or clinical psychological training. There is a shortage of psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, and psychotherapists.
Online mental health serviceReduce the risk of infectionHigh feasibilityLow utilizationUnbalanced development of online mental health servicesEffectiveness has not been evaluatedThe quality of mental health service is difficult to be guaranted
TelemedicineReduce the risk of infectionHigh securityMost medical institutions are not equipped with telemedicineLack of payment and regulatory structures, state permits, hospital-to-hospital certification, and program implementation
Structured letter therapyReduce the risk of infectionInability to deal with sudden psychological crises, serious psychological and mental problems, and suffering from other underlying diseases
With the development of artificial intelligence technology in the clinical environment, accelerating the construction of online mental health services (Table 3), the development of Internet technology, and the development of telemedicine are all valuable for the provision of mental health services during the pandemic. During the pandemic, online mental health services, such as hotlines and mobile application platforms, were also widely used in China. For example, the Chinese Psychological Association has also issued the work Guide to the Psychological Assistance Hotline during the COVID-19 outbreak and the Network Psychological Counseling work Guide during the special pandemic period to provide professional assistance for network psychological services. The study suggests that a nationwide collaborative network of psychiatrists, psychotherapists, researchers, and community volunteers combine Internet technology with the whole process of psychological intervention. It can better serve children's mental health. Online mental health service has been established as a basic measure to solve the mental health needs in the pandemic because of its high feasibility, but there are also the following problems: (1) low utilization of online mental health services (As low as 3.7% of participants have used mental health services since the outbreak of COVID-19.); (2) unbalanced development of online mental health services may widen the mental health gap in China (Individuals at the lower socioeconomic status have lower access to online mental health services.); (3) the effectiveness of online mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries has not been evaluated; (4) the quality of online mental health services in low-income and most middle-income countries is difficult to be guaranteed. The rapid spread of the virus between people hinders traditional face-to-face psychological intervention. By contrast, it is safe to provide telemedicine services (through video conferencing, e-mail, phone, or smartphone applications). Telemedicine can classify patients before they arrive in the emergency room and can carry on the effective screening of the patient (Table 3). This is both patient-centric and conducive to self-isolation and protecting patients, clinicians, and communities from infection. A team of psychiatrists in Paris successfully carried out teletherapy and telecommuting. And patients, psychiatrists, and psychologists have accepted this mode of treatment very well. Even the team may permanently implement this way of working. In Siena, Italy, psychiatrists have converted more than 90% of outpatient clinics' mode of consultation to telemedicine. Most patients use the telephone for consultation. For patients with apps such as WhatsApp (Facebook, California) or FaceTime, they consult via video calls, both of which work well. For the most seriously ill patients, they continue to conduct face-to-face visits. In addition, many studies have shown that telemedicine services are effective in providing mental health services in cases of depression, anxiety disorders, and posttraumatic stress disorder.54, 55, 56 During the COVID-19 global pandemic, the United States Department of Health and Human Services also relaxed many rules and regulations on telemedicine. A study shows that telemedicine may play an important role in establishing national strategic planning and coordination of psychological first aid for major disasters. However, telemedicine currently has the following problems: Most medical institutions are not equipped with telemedicine, payment and regulatory structures, state permits, hospital-to-hospital certification, and program implementation. Other studies have shown that structured letter therapy is also a feasible method of psychological intervention during a pandemic, but it needs to be further improved in dealing with sudden psychological crises, serious psychological and mental problems, and suffering from other underlying diseases.

Conclusions

At present, COVID-19 is a global pandemic, bringing physical, mental, and psychological harm to people all over the world, as well as huge losses in property. Special attention should be paid to the mental health of the general public, medical staff, and patients with mental disorders. Under the strict epidemic prevention and control policy, community mental health service system, online mental health service, telemedicine, and other measures may play an important role in this pandemic because of their advantages such as reducing the risk of infection. However, there are also some restrictions on these measures, which is exactly what we need to improve in the future. The development of telemedicine technology is closely related to the progress of communication and information technology, but it is still restricted by technology, law, and cognition in China. Telemedicine is widely used in developed countries, and it has been proved in many literatures that telemedicine plays an important role in the field of mental health services. This review can provide support and reference for other countries to implement psychological intervention.
  17 in total

1.  What about mental health after one year of COVID-19 pandemic? A comparison with the initial peak.

Authors:  Lorena García-Fernández; Verónica Romero-Ferreiro; Victoria Rodríguez; Miguel A Alvarez-Mon; Guillermo Lahera; Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  How healthcare workers are coping with mental health challenges during COVID-19 pandemic? - A cross-sectional multi-countries study.

Authors:  Mila Nu Nu Htay; Roy Rillera Marzo; Rafidah Bahari; Ayesha AlRifai; Fatjona Kamberi; Radwa Abdullah El-Abasiri; Jeldah Mokeira Nyamache; Htet Aung Hlaing; Mayada Hassanein; Soe Moe; Adinegara Lutfi Abas; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2021-05-07

3.  Facing the Pandemic: Burnout in Physicians in Turkey.

Authors:  Şengül Tarhan; Gökçen Ömeroğlu Şimşek; Neşe Direk Tecirli; Eyup Sabri Uçan; Merve Atik; Bahriye Oya İtil; Oğuz Kılınç
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2021-11

4.  The vulnerabilities of the Brazilian health workforce during health emergencies: Analysing personal feelings, access to resources and work dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Gabriela Lotta; Michelle Fernandez; Marcela Corrêa
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2021-01-27

5.  Psychiatric Clinical Profiles and Pharmacological Interactions in COVID-19 Inpatients Referred to a Consultation Liaison Psychiatry Unit: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Nestor Arbelo; Hugo López-Pelayo; María Sagué; Santiago Madero; Justo Pinzón-Espinosa; Susana Gomes-da-Costa; Lidia Ilzarbe; Gerard Anmella; Cristian-Daniel Llach; María-Luisa Imaz; María-Mercé Cámara; Luis Pintor
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2021-01-07

6.  Subjective Feelings of Polish Doctors after Receiving the COVID-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Krzysztof Zdziarski; Marek Landowski; Paulina Zabielska; Beata Karakiewicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Use of Telehealth in Mental Health (MH) Services During and After COVID-19.

Authors:  Todd Molfenter; Thomasine Heitkamp; Ann A Murphy; Stephanie Tapscott; Stephanie Behlman; Olivia J Cody
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2021-06-24

8.  Regulation of Mindfulness-Based Music Listening on Negative Emotions Related to COVID-19: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Xiaolin Liu; Yong Liu; Huijuan Shi; Ling Li; Maoping Zheng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Psychological distress during pandemic Covid-19 among adult general population: Result across 13 countries.

Authors:  Roy Rillera Marzo; Zaliha Ismail; Mila Nu Nu Htay; Rafidah Bahari; Roshidi Ismail; Emilio Quilatan Villanueva; Akansha Singh; Masoud Lotfizadeh; Titik Respati; Siska Nia Irasanti; Dewi Sartika; Pham Mong; Sarath Lekamwasam; Bikash Bikram Thapa; Burcu Kucuk Bicer; Soe Soe Aye; Karnjana Songwathana; Radwa Abdullah El-Abasiri; Amaluddin Ahmad; AzlinaWati Nikmat; Seyedeh Zeinab Taheri Mirani; Roushney Fatima Mukti; Saira Mehnaz; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2021-02-18

Review 10.  Psychological and neuropsychiatric implications of COVID-19.

Authors:  E B Mukaetova-Ladinska; G Kronenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 5.760

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.