Literature DB >> 32738801

The association between lower Hounsfield units on computed tomography and cage subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Zhuo Xi1,2, Praveen V Mummaneni1, Minghao Wang1, Huibing Ruan1, Shane Burch3, Vedat Deviren3, Aaron J Clark1, Sigurd H Berven3, Dean Chou1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One vexing problem after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery is cage subsidence. Low bone mineral density (BMD) may contribute to subsidence, and BMD is correlated with Hounsfield units (HUs) on CT. The authors investigated if lower HU values correlated with subsidence after LLIF.
METHODS: A retrospective study of patients undergoing single-level LLIF with pedicle screw fixation for degenerative conditions at the University of California, San Francisco, by 6 spine surgeons was performed. Data on demographics, cage parameters, preoperative HUs on CT, and postoperative subsidence were collected. Thirty-six-inch standing radiographs were used to measure segmental lordosis, disc space height, and subsidence; data were collected immediately postoperatively and at 1 year. Subsidence was graded using a published grade of disc height loss: grade 0, 0%-24%; grade I, 25%-49%; grade II, 50%-74%; and grade III, 75%-100%. HU values were measured on preoperative CT from L1 to L5, and each lumbar vertebral body HU was measured 4 separate times.
RESULTS: After identifying 138 patients who underwent LLIF, 68 met the study inclusion criteria. All patients had single-level LLIF with pedicle screw fixation. The mean follow-up duration was 25.3 ± 10.4 months. There were 40 patients who had grade 0 subsidence, 15 grade I, 9 grade II, and 4 grade III. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, or smoking. There were no significant differences in cage sizes, cage lordosis, and preoperative disc height. The mean segmental HU (the average HU value of the two vertebrae above and below the LLIF) was 169.5 ± 45 for grade 0, 130.3 ± 56.2 for grade I, 100.7 ± 30.2 for grade II, and 119.9 ± 52.9 for grade III (p < 0.001). After using a receiver operating characteristic curve to establish separation criteria between mild and severe subsidence, the most appropriate threshold of HU value was 135.02 between mild and severe subsidence (sensitivity 60%, specificity 92.3%). After univariate and multivariate analysis, preoperative segmental HU value was an independent risk factor for severe cage subsidence (p = 0.017, OR 15.694, 95% CI 1.621-151.961).
CONCLUSIONS: Lower HU values on preoperative CT are associated with cage subsidence after LLIF. Measurement of preoperative HU values on CT may be useful when planning LLIF surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC = area under the ROC curve; BMD = bone mineral density; BMP = bone morphogenetic protein; CT; DXA = dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; HU; HU = Hounsfield unit; Hounsfield units; ICC = interclass correlation coefficient; LLIF; LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion; PACS = picture archiving and communication system; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; ROI = region of interest; UCSF = University of California, San Francisco; cage subsidence; lateral lumbar interbody fusion; qCT = quantitative CT

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32738801     DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  10 in total

1.  The preoperative Hounsfield unit value at the position of the future screw insertion is a better predictor of screw loosening than other methods.

Authors:  Jingchi Li; Zhuang Zhang; Tianhang Xie; Zhetao Song; Yueming Song; Jiancheng Zeng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 7.034

2.  Deterioration of the fixation segment's stress distribution and the strength reduction of screw holding position together cause screw loosening in ALSR fixed OLIF patients with poor BMD.

Authors:  Jing-Chi Li; Zhi-Qiang Yang; Tian-Hang Xie; Zhe-Tao Song; Yue-Ming Song; Jian-Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-30

3.  The Mismatch Between Bony Endplates and Grafted Bone Increases Screw Loosening Risk for OLIF Patients With ALSR Fixation Biomechanically.

Authors:  Jing-Chi Li; Tian-Hang Xie; Zhuang Zhang; Zhe-Tao Song; Yue-Ming Song; Jian-Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  Prevalence and risk factors for cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiujiang Li; Xingxia Long; Lin Shi; Yinbin Wang; Tao Guan; Jinhan Lv; Lijun Cai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Bone Phenotyping Approaches in Human, Mice and Zebrafish - Expert Overview of the EU Cost Action GEMSTONE ("GEnomics of MusculoSkeletal traits TranslatiOnal NEtwork").

Authors:  Ines Foessl; J H Duncan Bassett; Åshild Bjørnerem; Björn Busse; Ângelo Calado; Pascale Chavassieux; Maria Christou; Eleni Douni; Imke A K Fiedler; João Eurico Fonseca; Eva Hassler; Wolfgang Högler; Erika Kague; David Karasik; Patricia Khashayar; Bente L Langdahl; Victoria D Leitch; Philippe Lopes; Georgios Markozannes; Fiona E A McGuigan; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Evangelia Ntzani; Ling Oei; Claes Ohlsson; Pawel Szulc; Jonathan H Tobias; Katerina Trajanoska; Şansın Tuzun; Amina Valjevac; Bert van Rietbergen; Graham R Williams; Tatjana Zekic; Fernando Rivadeneira; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Improving the Management of Patients with Osteoporosis Undergoing Spinal Fusion: The Need for a Bone Mineral Density-Matched Interbody Cage.

Authors:  Steven M Falowski; Sebastian F Koga; Trent Northcutt; Laszlo Garamszegi; Jeremi Leasure; Jon E Block
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2021-12-14

7.  Biomechanical Effects of Pedicle Screw Positioning on the Surgical Segment in Models After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An in-silico Study.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Chenyi Huang; Ping Cai; Zhongxin Fang; Zhangchao Wei; Fei Liu; Jingchi Li; Yang Liu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-02-02

8.  Comparative Study of Cage Subsidence in Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Akihiko Hiyama; Daisuke Sakai; Hiroyuki Katoh; Satoshi Nomura; Masato Sato; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yihang Yu; Dale L Robinson; David C Ackland; Yi Yang; Peter Vee Sin Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Influence of coronal-morphology of endplate and intervertebral space to cage subsidence and fusion following oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Tianhang Xie; Liming Pu; Long Zhao; Yufei Lu; Zhiqiang Yang; Xiandi Wang; Yueming Song; Jiancheng Zeng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.