Dana Leng Hui Chan1, Grace Li Xian Toh1, Liuh Ling Goh2. 1. Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore. 2. Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: liuh_ling_goh@ttsh.com.sg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Majority of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients progressed on epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) due to acquired T790M mutation. Blood sample is increasingly used in clinical setting for EGFR T790M detection and our laboratory employed the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) methodology for testing. This study investigated the positive rate, specimen type for rebiopsy and clinical impact of blood-based EGFR T790M testing. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated clinical samples that underwent plasma EGFR T790M testing in TTSH Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory from August 2017 to September 2019. Data on diagnosis, EGFR activating and T790M mutations, and treatment strategies were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 104 progressive NSCLC cases were included in this study. Overall, 46 patients (44.2%) were tested T790M positive, and 47.8% of these tested positive had low levels (defined as ≤3% fractional abundance and <50 copies/mL plasma), which may be missed by the conventional methods with lower sensitivity. Of these tested with low T790M abundance, 77.3% subsequently received osimertinib. Activating mutations were not detected in 42 (40.4%) cases, indicating that the tumors were not actively shedding ctDNA. Among these, 24 patients underwent repeat testing with tissue or blood specimens. Thirteen patients were subsequently tested T790M positive and 12 of them switched treatment to osimertinib. The recommendation to repeat testing with a different biopsy or after a suitable interval increased the overall positive rate to 56.7% (59/104). CONCLUSION: The use of a highly sensitive platform such as ddPCR for the detection of low abundance T790M, and the approach of repeat testing in cases with insufficient ctDNA increased the positive rate. This in turn identified more patients who are eligible for targeted therapy.
BACKGROUND: Majority of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients progressed on epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) due to acquired T790M mutation. Blood sample is increasingly used in clinical setting for EGFR T790M detection and our laboratory employed the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) methodology for testing. This study investigated the positive rate, specimen type for rebiopsy and clinical impact of blood-based EGFR T790M testing. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated clinical samples that underwent plasma EGFR T790M testing in TTSH Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory from August 2017 to September 2019. Data on diagnosis, EGFR activating and T790M mutations, and treatment strategies were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 104 progressive NSCLC cases were included in this study. Overall, 46 patients (44.2%) were tested T790M positive, and 47.8% of these tested positive had low levels (defined as ≤3% fractional abundance and <50 copies/mL plasma), which may be missed by the conventional methods with lower sensitivity. Of these tested with low T790M abundance, 77.3% subsequently received osimertinib. Activating mutations were not detected in 42 (40.4%) cases, indicating that the tumors were not actively shedding ctDNA. Among these, 24 patients underwent repeat testing with tissue or blood specimens. Thirteen patients were subsequently tested T790M positive and 12 of them switched treatment to osimertinib. The recommendation to repeat testing with a different biopsy or after a suitable interval increased the overall positive rate to 56.7% (59/104). CONCLUSION: The use of a highly sensitive platform such as ddPCR for the detection of low abundance T790M, and the approach of repeat testing in cases with insufficient ctDNA increased the positive rate. This in turn identified more patients who are eligible for targeted therapy.
Authors: Drew F K Williamson; Sean R N Marris; Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla; Jacqueline L Bruce; Cloud P Paweletz; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Lynette M Sholl; Fei Dong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 3.240