Judyta Wiercińska1, Janusz Winiecki2, Anna Wronczewska3, Andrzej Lebioda4, Krzysztof Pławski5, Piotr Rhone5, Roman Makarewicz4. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland; Department of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. Electronic address: lasotajudyta@gmail.com. 2. Department of Medical Physics, Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland; Department of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. 3. Brachytherapy Department, Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland. 4. Department of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland; Brachytherapy Department, Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland. 5. Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate usefulness of hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel as a tumour bed marker in breast conserving therapy (BCT). To analyze inter- (Inter-OV) and intraobserver (Intra-OV) variability of contouring boost target volume (CTVboost) in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients in the HA group and 30 patients in the control group with an early stage breast cancer were included in the study. During the surgery 1-3 ml of HA hydrogel was injected into breast to mark the tumour bed for every patient in the HA group. Moreover, surgical clips were placed underneath the lumpectomy cavity. Patients in the control group were marked only by metal markers. Three radiation oncologists delineated CTVboost twice for every patient. Three parameters were calculated to quantify contouring variability: coefficient of variation for volumes (COVV), center of mass displacement (CoMd) and conformity index (CI). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between mean values of COVV for HA and control group, neither for Intra-OV (0.14 vs 0.13) nor Inter-OV (0.19 vs 0.18) calculations. The mean CoMd were 6.1 mm and 9.1 mm for Inter-OV calculations and 3.9 mm and 6.4 mm for Intra-OV in the HA and the control group respectively. The mean CI for Intra-OV improved from 0.61 to 0.65 and from 0.47 to 0.56 for Inter-OV in the control and HA group respectively. CONCLUSION: HA hydrogel used as a tumour bed marker improves tumour bed visibility and reduces inter- and intraobserver variability of EBRT boost target volume delineations.
PURPOSE: To evaluate usefulness of hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel as a tumour bed marker in breast conserving therapy (BCT). To analyze inter- (Inter-OV) and intraobserver (Intra-OV) variability of contouring boost target volume (CTVboost) in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients in the HA group and 30 patients in the control group with an early stage breast cancer were included in the study. During the surgery 1-3 ml of HA hydrogel was injected into breast to mark the tumour bed for every patient in the HA group. Moreover, surgical clips were placed underneath the lumpectomy cavity. Patients in the control group were marked only by metal markers. Three radiation oncologists delineated CTVboost twice for every patient. Three parameters were calculated to quantify contouring variability: coefficient of variation for volumes (COVV), center of mass displacement (CoMd) and conformity index (CI). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between mean values of COVV for HA and control group, neither for Intra-OV (0.14 vs 0.13) nor Inter-OV (0.19 vs 0.18) calculations. The mean CoMd were 6.1 mm and 9.1 mm for Inter-OV calculations and 3.9 mm and 6.4 mm for Intra-OV in the HA and the control group respectively. The mean CI for Intra-OV improved from 0.61 to 0.65 and from 0.47 to 0.56 for Inter-OV in the control and HA group respectively. CONCLUSION:HA hydrogel used as a tumour bed marker improves tumour bed visibility and reduces inter- and intraobserver variability of EBRT boost target volume delineations.