Literature DB >> 32738091

A novel sequence for simultaneous measurement of whole-brain static and dynamic MRA, intracranial vessel wall image, and T1 -weighted structural brain MRI.

Zhensen Chen1, Zechen Zhou2, Haikun Qi3, Huijun Chen4, Baocheng Chu1, Thomas S Hatsukami5, Chun Yuan1, Niranjan Balu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To propose a highly time-efficient imaging technique named improved simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (iSNAP) for simultaneous assessment of lumen, vessel wall, and blood flow in intracranial arteries.
METHODS: iSNAP consists of pulsed arterial spin labeling preparations and 3D golden angle radial acquisition. Images were reconstructed by k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) method with optimized data-sharing strategies. Dynamic MRA for blood flow assessment was obtained from iSNAP by reconstruction at multiple inversion times and image subtraction, static MRA by both image subtraction approach and phase-sensitive inversion recovery technique, and vessel wall images by both reconstruction at zero-crossing time-point of blood and phase-sensitive inversion recovery. A T1 -weighted brain MRI was also reconstructed from iSNAP. Preliminary comparison of iSNAP against the dedicated dynamic MRA sequence 4D-TRANCE, MRA/vessel wall imaging sequence SNAP, and vessel wall imaging sequence T1 -weighted VISTA was performed in healthy volunteers and patients.
RESULTS: iSNAP has whole-brain coverage and takes ~6.5 min. The dedicated reconstruction strategies are feasible for each iSNAP image contrast and beneficial for image SNR. iSNAP-dynamic MRA yields similar dynamic flow information as 4D-TRANCE and allows more flexible temporal resolution. The 2 types of iSNAP static MRA images complement each other in characterizing both proximal large arteries and distal small arteries. Depiction of vessel wall lesions in iSNAP vessel wall images is better than SNAP and may be similar to T1 -weighted VISTA, although the images are slightly blurred.
CONCLUSION: iSNAP provides a time-efficient evaluation of intracranial arteries and may have great potential for comprehensive assessment of intracranial vascular conditions using a single sequence.
© 2020 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRA; blood flow; dynamic MRA; iSNAP; intracranial; vessel wall

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32738091      PMCID: PMC7722084          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  20 in total

1.  k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) for contrast manipulation in projection reconstruction MRI.

Authors:  H K Song; L Dougherty
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Noncontrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) intracranial MR angiography using pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling and accelerated 3D radial acquisition.

Authors:  Huimin Wu; Walter F Block; Patrick A Turski; Charles A Mistretta; Kevin M Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Clinical applications of transcranial Doppler sonography.

Authors:  Bawarjan Schatlo; Ryszard M Pluta
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2007-01

4.  Noncontrast dynamic 3D intracranial MR angiography using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) and accelerated 3D radial acquisition.

Authors:  Huimin Wu; Walter F Block; Patrick A Turski; Charles A Mistretta; David J Rusinak; Yijing Wu; Kevin M Johnson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping.

Authors:  S G Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging for carotid atherosclerotic disease evaluation.

Authors:  Jinnan Wang; Peter Börnert; Huilin Zhao; Daniel S Hippe; Xihai Zhao; Niranjan Balu; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami; Jianrong Xu; Chun Yuan; William S Kerwin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The Use and Pitfalls of Intracranial Vessel Wall Imaging: How We Do It.

Authors:  Arjen Lindenholz; Anja G van der Kolk; Jaco J M Zwanenburg; Jeroen Hendrikse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Quantification of intracranial arterial blood flow using noncontrast enhanced 4D dynamic MR angiography.

Authors:  Xingfeng Shao; Ziwei Zhao; Jonathan Russin; Arun Amar; Nerses Sanossian; Danny Jj Wang; Lirong Yan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Imaging with Quantitative Vessel Wall T1 Mapping: Technical Development and Initial Experience.

Authors:  Haikun Qi; Jie Sun; Huiyu Qiao; Shuo Chen; Zechen Zhou; Xinlei Pan; Yishi Wang; Xihai Zhao; Rui Li; Chun Yuan; Huijun Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  In Vivo Validation of Simultaneous Non-Contrast Angiography and intraPlaque Hemorrhage (SNAP) Magnetic Resonance Angiography: An Intracranial Artery Study.

Authors:  Jinnan Wang; Maobin Guan; Kiyofumi Yamada; Daniel S Hippe; William S Kerwin; Chun Yuan; Peter Börnert; Xihai Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Associations of intracranial artery length and branch number on non-contrast enhanced MRA with cognitive impairment in individuals with carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Zhensen Chen; Anders Gould; Duygu Baylam Geleri; Niranjan Balu; Li Chen; Baocheng Chu; Kristi Pimentel; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Vessel length on SNAP MRA and TOF MRA is a potential imaging biomarker for brain blood flow.

Authors:  Anders Gould; Zhensen Chen; Duygu Baylam Geleri; Niranjan Balu; Zechen Zhou; Li Chen; Baocheng Chu; Kristi Pimentel; Gador Canton; Thomas Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.130

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.