Literature DB >> 32737717

A phase Ib open-label dose escalation study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cobimetinib (GDC-0973) and ipatasertib (GDC-0068) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

Geoffrey I Shapiro1, Patricia LoRusso2, Daniel C Cho3, Luna Musib4, Yibing Yan4, Matthew Wongchenko4, Ilsung Chang4,5, Premal Patel4, Iris T Chan4, Sandra Sanabria-Bohorquez4, Raymond D Meng4, Johanna C Bendell6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This Phase Ib study explored combination dosing of the allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor cobimetinib and the ATP-competitive pan-AKT inhibitor ipatasertib.
METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled to two dose escalation arms, each using a 3 + 3 design in 28-day cycles. In Arm A, patients received concurrent cobimetinib and ipatasertib on days 1-21. In Arm B, cobimetinib was administered intermittently with ipatasertib for 21 days. Primary objectives evaluated dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated doses (MTD), and the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters, MAPK and PI3K pathway alterations, changes in tissue biomarkers, and preliminary anti-tumor efficacy. Expansion cohorts included patients with PTEN-deficient triple-negative breast cancer and endometrial cancer.
RESULTS: Among 66 patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug, all experienced an adverse event (AE). Although no DLTs were reported, 6 patients experienced Cycle 1 DLT-equivalent AEs. The most common treatment-related AEs were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, dermatitis acneiform, and fatigue. Thirty-five (53%) patients experienced drug-related AEs of ≥ grade 3 severity. Cobimetinb/ipatasertib MTDs were 60/200 mg on Arm A and 150/300 mg on Arm B; the latter was chosen as the RP2D. No pharmacokinetic interactions were identified. Biomarker analyses indicated pathway blockade and increases in IFNγ and PD-L1 gene expression following the combination. Three patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer achieved partial response, all with PTEN-low disease and two with tumor also harboring KRAS mutation.
CONCLUSION: There was limited tolerability and efficacy for this MEK and AKT inhibitor combination. Nonetheless, pharmacodynamic analyses indicated target engagement and suggest rationale for further exploration of cobimetinib or ipatasertib in combination with other anticancer agents. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01562275.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AKT; Clinical trial; KRAS; MEK1/2; Nanostring; Reverse-phase protein array

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32737717     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-020-00975-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  3 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Immunosuppressive Agents Based on Signal Pathway.

Authors:  Zhiqing Xu; Ming Chu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 2.  MEK inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jing Han; Yang Liu; Sen Yang; Xuan Wu; Hongle Li; Qiming Wang
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 17.388

3.  Identification of novel natural inhibitors targeting AKT Serine/Threonine Kinase 1 (AKT1) by computational study.

Authors:  Sheng Zhong; Zhiyun Zhang; Zhen Guo; Wenzhuo Yang; Gaojing Dou; Xiaye Lv; Xinhui Wang; Junliang Ge; Bo Wu; Xuefeng Pan; Hongyu Wang; Yonggao Mou
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 6.832

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.