| Literature DB >> 32737620 |
Yiqun Du1,2, Jian Zhang1,2, Yanchun Meng1, Mingzhu Huang1,2, Wangjun Yan1,3, Zhiqiang Wu4,5.
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRs) have shown tremendous potential to act as therapeutic targets for cancer treatment. In this context, the present study was designed to investigate the potential of miR-143 in the treatment of breast cancer. Results showed that miR-143 to be significantly (P < 0.05) downregulated in breast cancer tissues and cell lines. The miR-143 has inhibitory effect on CAMA-1cell growth which was manifested as significant (P < 0.05) decline in loss of viability of cancer cells. The loss of cell viability was revealed to be due to the induction of apoptotic cell death as evident from acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining assays. The apoptotic cell percentage was found to be 35.7% in miR-143 mimics transfected in comparison to 6.4% in miR-NC transfected cells. The western blot analysis showed that miR-143 caused enhancement in Bax and suppression in Bcl-2 expression in CAMA-1 cells. The miR-143 also suppressed the bone metastasis of the CAMA-1 cells by suppressing the expression of Jag1 and deactivation of the Rho-signalling pathway. The transwell assays also showed considerable anti-metastatic effects of miR-143 on CAMA-1 cells. Taken together, miR-143 has growth inhibitory anti-metastatic effect on breast cancer and thus may prove beneficial in breast cancer treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Cell proliferation; Chemo-sensitivity; Invasion; Metastasis; Migration
Year: 2020 PMID: 32737620 PMCID: PMC7394972 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-020-01072-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1Expression of miR-143 in (a) normal and cancer tissues (b) normal and breast cancer cell lines. The experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as mean ± SD (*P < 0.05)
Fig. 2a Expression of miR-143 in miR-NC and miR-143 mimics transfected CAMA-1 cells. b Cell viability of miR-NC and miR-143 mimics transfected CAMA-1 cells. c DAPI staining of miR-NC and miR-143 mimics transfected CAMA-1 cells. d AO/EB staining of miR-NC and miR-143 mimics transfected CAMA-1 cells. e Annexin V/PI staining of miR-NC and miR-143 mimics transfected CAMA-1 cells. f Western blot analysis showing the expression of Bax and Bcl-2 in miR-NC and miR-143 mimics transfected CAMA-1 cells. The experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as mean ± SD (*P < 0.05)
Fig. 3a Western blots showing the expression of Jag1 in miR-NC and miR-143 mimics transfected CAMA-1 cells. b Western blots showing the effect of miR-143 overexpression on the Rho- signalling pathway in CAMA-1 cells. c Transwell assay showing cell migration in miR-NC and miR-143 mimics transfected CAMA-1 cells. d Transwell assay showing cell invasion in miR-NC and miR-143 mimics transfected CAMA-1 cells. The experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as mean ± SD (*P < 0.05)
Fig. 4a Bioinformatic analysis using TargetScan software (http://www.targetscan.org) showing MAPK3 as the target of miR-143. b Dual luciferase. c Expression of MAPK3 in normal and breast cancer cells. d Western blot analysis showing the expression of MAPK3 in miR-NC and miR-143 mimics transfected CAMA-1 cells. The experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as mean ± SD (*P < 0.05)
Fig. 5a Expression of MAPK3 in si-NC and si-MAPK3 transfected CAMA-1 cells. b Cell viability of si-NC and si-MAPK3 transfected CAMA-1 cells. c Cell viability of si-NC, si-MAPK3, si-MAPK3 + miR-143 inhibitor and miR-143 mimics + pcDNA-MAPK3 transfected CAMA-1 cells. The experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as mean ± SD (*P < 0.05)