Literature DB >> 32737030

Endometrial Cancer Molecular Risk Stratification is Equally Prognostic for Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma.

Pauline Krämer1,2, Aline Talhouk2,3, Mary Anne Brett4, Derek S Chiu3,5, Evan S Cairns2, Daniëlla A Scheunhage6, Rory F L Hammond7, David Farnell3,8, Tayyebeh M Nazeran3,8, Marcel Grube1, Zhouchunyang Xia3,8, Janine Senz3,8, Samuel Leung3,8, Lukas Feil1,2, Jana Pasternak1, Katherine Dixon9, Andreas Hartkopf1, Bernhard Krämer1, Sara Brucker1, Florian Heitz10,11, Andreas du Bois10, Philipp Harter10, Felix K F Kommoss12, Hans-Peter Sinn12, Sabine Heublein13, Friedrich Kommoss14, Hans-Walter Vollert15, Ranjit Manchanda16,17, Cornelis D de Kroon18, Hans W Nijman19, Marco de Bruyn19, Emily F Thompson3,8, Ali Bashashati3,5,8,20, Jessica N McAlpine2,3, Naveena Singh7, Anna V Tinker3,21, Annette Staebler22, Tjalling Bosse6, Stefan Kommoss1, Martin Köbel23, Michael S Anglesio24,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is generally associated with a more favorable prognosis compared with other ovarian carcinomas. Nonetheless, current patient treatment continues to follow a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Even though tumor staging offers stratification, personalized treatments remain elusive. As ENOC shares many clinical and molecular features with its endometrial counterpart, we sought to investigate The Cancer Genome Atlas-inspired endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular subtyping in a cohort of ENOC. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: IHC and mutation biomarkers were used to segregate 511 ENOC tumors into four EC-inspired molecular subtypes: low-risk POLE mutant (POLEmut), moderate-risk mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), high-risk p53 abnormal (p53abn), and moderate-risk with no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Survival analysis with established clinicopathologic and subtype-specific features was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 3.5% of cases were POLEmut, 13.7% MMRd, 9.6% p53abn, and 73.2% NSMP, each showing distinct outcomes (P < 0.001) and survival similar to observations in EC. Median OS was 18.1 years in NSMP, 12.3 years in MMRd, 4.7 years in p53abn, and not reached for POLEmut cases. Subtypes were independent of stage, grade, and residual disease in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: EC-inspired molecular classification provides independent prognostic information in ENOC. Our findings support investigating molecular subtype-specific management recommendations for patients with ENOC; for example, subtypes may provide guidance when fertility-sparing treatment is desired. Similarities between ENOC and EC suggest that patients with ENOC may benefit from management strategies applied to EC and the opportunity to study those in umbrella trials. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32737030     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  11 in total

1.  Validated biomarker assays confirm that ARID1A loss is confounded with MMR deficiency, CD8+ TIL infiltration, and provides no independent prognostic value in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  Karolin Heinze; Tayyebeh M Nazeran; Sandra Lee; Pauline Krämer; Evan S Cairns; Derek S Chiu; Samuel Cy Leung; Eun Young Kang; Nicola S Meagher; Catherine J Kennedy; Jessica Boros; Friedrich Kommoss; Hans-Walter Vollert; Florian Heitz; Andreas du Bois; Philipp Harter; Marcel Grube; Bernhard Kraemer; Annette Staebler; Felix Kf Kommoss; Sabine Heublein; Hans-Peter Sinn; Naveena Singh; Angela Laslavic; Esther Elishaev; Alex Olawaiye; Kirsten Moysich; Francesmary Modugno; Raghwa Sharma; Alison H Brand; Paul R Harnett; Anna DeFazio; Renée T Fortner; Jan Lubinski; Marcin Lener; Aleksandra Tołoczko-Grabarek; Cezary Cybulski; Helena Gronwald; Jacek Gronwald; Penny Coulson; Mona A El-Bahrawy; Michael E Jones; Minouk J Schoemaker; Anthony J Swerdlow; Kylie L Gorringe; Ian Campbell; Linda Cook; Simon A Gayther; Michael E Carney; Yurii B Shvetsov; Brenda Y Hernandez; Lynne R Wilkens; Marc T Goodman; Constantina Mateoiu; Anna Linder; Karin Sundfeldt; Linda E Kelemen; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Martin Widschwendter; Usha Menon; Kelly L Bolton; Jennifer Alsop; Mitul Shah; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Paul Dp Pharoah; James D Brenton; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Holly R Harris; Jennifer A Doherty; Blake Gilks; Prafull Ghatage; David G Huntsman; Gregg S Nelson; Anna V Tinker; Cheng-Han Lee; Ellen L Goode; Brad H Nelson; Susan J Ramus; Stefan Kommoss; Aline Talhouk; Martin Köbel; Michael S Anglesio
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 9.883

2.  Joint IARC/NCI International Cancer Seminar Series Report: expert consensus on future directions for ovarian carcinoma research.

Authors:  Shama Virani; Glauco Baiocchi; David Bowtell; Citadel J Cabasag; Kathleen R Cho; Renée T Fortner; Keiichi Fujiwara; Jae-Weon Kim; Martin Köbel; Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz; Douglas A Levine; Usha Menon; Barbara M Norquist; Paul D P Pharoah; Anil K Sood; Shelley T Tworoger; Nicolas Wentzensen; Stephen J Chanock; Paul Brennan; Britton Trabert
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  Immunohistochemical Biomarkers as a Surrogate of Molecular Analysis in Ovarian Carcinomas: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Giacomo Santandrea; Simonetta Piana; Riccardo Valli; Magda Zanelli; Elisa Gasparini; Antonio De Leo; Vincenzo Dario Mandato; Andrea Palicelli
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-29

4.  Selection of endometrial carcinomas for p53 immunohistochemistry based on nuclear features.

Authors:  Eun Young Kang; Nicholas Jp Wiebe; Christa Aubrey; Cheng-Han Lee; Michael S Anglesio; Derek Tilley; Prafull Ghatage; Gregg S Nelson; Sandra Lee; Martin Köbel
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2021-10-01

Review 5.  Predictive and Prognostic Value of Microsatellite Instability in Gynecologic Cancer (Endometrial and Ovarian).

Authors:  Camille Evrard; Jérôme Alexandre
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Integrated molecular characterisation of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma identifies opportunities for stratification.

Authors:  Charlie Gourley; C Simon Herrington; Robert L Hollis; Barbara Stanley; John P Thomson; Michael Churchman; Ian Croy; Tzyvia Rye; Clare Bartos; Fiona Nussey; Melanie Mackean; Alison M Meynert; Colin A Semple
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-06-02

Review 7.  Genomic alterations in gynecological malignancies: histotype-associated driver mutations, molecular subtyping schemes, and tumorigenic mechanisms.

Authors:  Seiichi Mori; Osamu Gotoh; Kazuma Kiyotani; Siew Kee Low
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 8.  A Review of the Clinical Characteristics and Novel Molecular Subtypes of Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Shuangfeng Chen; Yuebo Li; Lili Qian; Sisi Deng; Luwen Liu; Weihua Xiao; Ying Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  A Modern Approach to Endometrial Carcinoma: Will Molecular Classification Improve Precision Medicine in the Future?

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Till Walter; Birgid Schömig-Markiefka; Tobias Engler; Stefan Kommoss; Sara Yvonne Brucker
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Eun Young Kang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.