Courtenay M Holscher1, M Libby Weaver1, James H Black1, Christopher J Abularrage1, Ying Wei Lum1, Thomas Reifsnyder2, Devin S Zarkowsky3, Caitlin W Hicks4. 1. Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD. 2. Division of Vascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD. 3. Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. 4. Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: chicks11@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Local market competition has been previously associated with more aggressive surgical decision-making. For example, more local competition for organs is associated with acceptance of lower quality kidney offers in transplant surgery. We hypothesized that market competition would be associated with the size of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at the time of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: We included all elective EVARs reported in the Vascular Quality Initiative database (2012-2018). Small AAAs were defined as a maximum diameter <5.5 cm in men or <5.0 cm in women. We calculated the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), a measure of physician market concentration (higher HHI = less market competition), for each US census region. Multilevel regression was used to examine the association between the size of AAA at EVAR and HHI, clustering by region. RESULTS: Of 37,914 EVARs performed, 15,379 (40.6%) were for small AAAs. There was significant variation in proportion of EVARs performed for small AAAs across regions (P < 0.001). The South had both the highest proportion of EVARs for small AAAs (44.2%) as well as the highest market competition (HHI 50), whereas the West had the lowest proportion of EVARs for small AAAs (35.0%) and the lowest market competition (HHI 107). Adjusting for patient characteristics, each 10 unit increase in HHI was associated with a 0.1 mm larger maximum AAA diameter at the time of EVAR (95% CI 0.04-0.24 mm, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Physician market concentration is independently associated with AAA diameter at time of elective EVAR. These data suggest that physician decision-making for EVAR is impacted by market competition.
BACKGROUND: Local market competition has been previously associated with more aggressive surgical decision-making. For example, more local competition for organs is associated with acceptance of lower quality kidney offers in transplant surgery. We hypothesized that market competition would be associated with the size of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at the time of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: We included all elective EVARs reported in the Vascular Quality Initiative database (2012-2018). Small AAAs were defined as a maximum diameter <5.5 cm in men or <5.0 cm in women. We calculated the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), a measure of physician market concentration (higher HHI = less market competition), for each US census region. Multilevel regression was used to examine the association between the size of AAA at EVAR and HHI, clustering by region. RESULTS: Of 37,914 EVARs performed, 15,379 (40.6%) were for small AAAs. There was significant variation in proportion of EVARs performed for small AAAs across regions (P < 0.001). The South had both the highest proportion of EVARs for small AAAs (44.2%) as well as the highest market competition (HHI 50), whereas the West had the lowest proportion of EVARs for small AAAs (35.0%) and the lowest market competition (HHI 107). Adjusting for patient characteristics, each 10 unit increase in HHI was associated with a 0.1 mm larger maximum AAA diameter at the time of EVAR (95% CI 0.04-0.24 mm, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Physician market concentration is independently associated with AAA diameter at time of elective EVAR. These data suggest that physician decision-making for EVAR is impacted by market competition.
Authors: Niveditta Ramkumar; Bjoern D Suckow; Shipra Arya; Art Sedrakyan; Todd A Mackenzie; Philip P Goodney; Jeremiah R Brown Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-02-05
Authors: Rosh K V Sethi; Antonia J Henry; Nathanael D Hevelone; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael Belkin; Louis L Nguyen Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: John G Albertini; Peiqi Wang; Christine Fahim; Susan Hutfless; Thomas Stasko; Allison T Vidimos; Barry Leshin; Elizabeth M Billingsley; Brett M Coldiron; Richard G Bennett; Victor J Marks; Angela Park; Heidi N Overton; William E Bruhn; Tim Xu; Aravind Krishnan; Martin A Makary Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Marcelo Cerullo; Sophia Y Chen; Mary Dillhoff; Carl Schmidt; Joseph K Canner; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Clare Oliver-Williams; Michael J Sweeting; Jo Jacomelli; Lisa Summers; Anne Stevenson; Tim Lees; Jonothan J Earnshaw Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 29.690