Literature DB >> 32735764

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk.

Mary A Majumder1, Christi J Guerrini1, Amy L McGuire1.   

Abstract

Although the explosive growth of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing has moderated, a substantial number of patients are choosing to undergo genetic testing outside the purview of their regular healthcare providers. Further, many industry leaders have been expanding reports to cover many more genes, as well as partnering with employers and others to expand access. This review addresses continuing concerns about DTC genetic testing quality, psychosocial impact, integration with medical practice, effects on the healthcare system, and privacy, as well as emerging concerns about third-party interpretation services and non-health-related uses such as investigative genetic genealogy. It concludes with an examination of two possible futures for DTC genetic testing: merger with traditional modes of healthcare delivery or continuation as a parallel system for patient-driven generation of health-relevant information. Each possibility is associated with distinctive questions related to value and risk. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 72 is January 27, 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32735764     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-070119-114727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Med        ISSN: 0066-4219            Impact factor:   13.739


  10 in total

1.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Grace C Hillyer; Lalitha Samuel; Erela Datuowei; Betty Cohn
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-10-14

Review 2.  Personalized Nutrition in the Management of Female Infertility: New Insights on Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation.

Authors:  Gemma Fabozzi; Giulia Verdone; Mariachiara Allori; Danilo Cimadomo; Carla Tatone; Liborio Stuppia; Marica Franzago; Nicolò Ubaldi; Alberto Vaiarelli; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi; Gianluca Gennarelli
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Perceived fairness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing business models.

Authors:  Philipp A Toussaint; Scott Thiebes; Manuel Schmidt-Kraepelin; Ali Sunyaev
Journal:  Electron Mark       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Perception of personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing among undergraduates in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Nicholas Yan Chai Cheung; Jasmine Lee Fong Fung; Yvette Nga Chung Ng; Wilfred Hing Sang Wong; Claudia Ching Yan Chung; Christopher Chun Yu Mak; Brian Hon Yin Chung
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.639

5.  The symptom discounting effect: what to do when negative genetic test results become risk factors for alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Annalise M Perricone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Parental Guidance Suggested: Engaging Parents as Partners in Research Studies of Genomic Screening for a Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Sabrina N Powell; Grace Byfield; Ashley Bennetone; Annabelle M Frantz; Langston K Harrison; Erin R James-Crook; Heather Osborne; Thomas H Owens; Jonathan L Shaw; Julianne O'Daniel; Laura V Milko
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Limited Genomics Training Among Physicians Remains a Barrier to Genomics-Based Implementation of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Valerie M Schaibley; Irma N Ramos; Raymond L Woosley; Steven Curry; Sean Hays; Kenneth S Ramos
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-18

8.  A Remote Longitudinal Observational Study of Individuals at Genetic Risk for Parkinson Disease: Baseline Results.

Authors:  Stella Jensen-Roberts; Taylor L Myers; Peggy Auinger; Paul Cannon; Helen M Rowbotham; Daniella Coker; Eli Chanoff; Julia Soto; Meghan Pawlik; Katherine Amodeo; Saloni Sharma; Blanca Valdovinos; Renee Wilson; Aayush Sarkar; Michael P McDermott; Roy N Alcalay; Kevin Biglan; Daniel Kinel; Caroline Tanner; Reni Winter-Evans; Erika F Augustine; Robert G Holloway; E Ray Dorsey; Ruth B Schneider
Journal:  Neurol Genet       Date:  2022-08-11

9.  Drama as a Powerful Tool to Enrich Socio-scientific Argumentation.

Authors:  Pablo Antonio Archila; Silvia Restrepo; Anne-Marie Truscott de Mejía; Natasha I Bloch
Journal:  Int J Sci Math Educ       Date:  2022-10-06

10.  Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective.

Authors:  Nina F de Groot; Britta C van Beers; Gerben Meynen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 2.903

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.