Literature DB >> 32735446

Update Alert: Ventilation Techniques and Risk for Transmission of Coronavirus Disease, Including COVID-19.

Bram Rochwerg1, Karla Solo1, Andrea Darzi1, Guang Chen2, Assem M Khamis3, Ewa Borowiack, Gian Paolo Morgano, Anisa Hajizadeh, Chen Chen, Hong Zhao, Tamara Lotfi, Leila Harrison, Finn Schünemann, Antonio Bognanni, Rebecca Thomas, Rosa Stalteri, Anna Bak, Marge Reinap, Joanne Khabsa, Layal Hneiny, Elie A Akl, Holger J Schünemann.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32735446      PMCID: PMC7418490          DOI: 10.7326/L20-0944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


× No keyword cloud information.
The end date for this most recent search update for our living systematic review (1) is 7 June 2020. We found 6 new citations that met eligibility for inclusion in our review addressing noninvasive mechanical ventilation for individuals with acute hypoxic respiratory failure caused by coronavirus (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19], Middle East respiratory syndrome, and severe acute respiratory syndrome) (2–7). Five are cohort studies (2, 4, 5–7) and one is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (4) (Supplement Tables 1 and 2). The RCT, which had some concerns regarding risk of bias, compared high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with standard oxygen therapy in 74 patients with COVID-19 (4). Use of HFNC was associated with a reduction in the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and improvements in oxygenation compared with standard oxygen therapy. Of the 5 cohort studies, 1 compared HFNC with invasive mechanical ventilation (3), 1 compared bilevel noninvasive ventilation with standard oxygen therapy (7), 1 compared bilevel noninvasive ventilation with both invasive mechanical ventilation and standard oxygen therapy (6), 1 compared bilevel noninvasive ventilation with HFNC (5), and 1 compared bilevel noninvasive ventilation with invasive mechanical ventilation (2). All of the cohort studies had moderate risk of bias with Ottawa–Newcastle scores of 6 to 7. Two of them included fewer than 10 patients with such a low number of events that trustworthy conclusions were not possible (3, 5). The other cohort studies did not report many of our outcomes of interest; when they did, there was no important difference between groups. In summary, the most informative new study included in this update, an RCT done by Li and colleagues (4), demonstrated results consistent with our current understanding that the use of HFNC compared with standard oxygen therapy may decrease the need for invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19. Click here for additional data file.
  3 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics of 34 COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit in Hangzhou, China.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Li-Jun Sun; Mi Xu; Jian Pan; Yun-Tao Zhang; Xue-Ling Fang; Qiang Fang; Hong-Liu Cai
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Ventilation Techniques and Risk for Transmission of Coronavirus Disease, Including COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review of Multiple Streams of Evidence.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Joanne Khabsa; Karla Solo; Assem M Khamis; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Amena El-Harakeh; Andrea Darzi; Anisa Hajizadeh; Antonio Bognanni; Anna Bak; Ariel Izcovich; Carlos A Cuello-Garcia; Chen Chen; Ewa Borowiack; Fatimah Chamseddine; Finn Schünemann; Gian Paolo Morgano; Giovanna E U Muti-Schünemann; Guang Chen; Hong Zhao; Ignacio Neumann; Jan Brozek; Joel Schmidt; Layal Hneiny; Leila Harrison; Marge Reinap; Mats Junek; Nancy Santesso; Rayane El-Khoury; Rebecca Thomas; Robby Nieuwlaat; Rosa Stalteri; Sally Yaacoub; Tamara Lotfi; Tejan Baldeh; Thomas Piggott; Yuan Zhang; Zahra Saad; Bram Rochwerg; Dan Perri; Eddy Fan; Florian Stehling; Imad Bou Akl; Mark Loeb; Paul Garner; Stephen Aston; Waleed Alhazzani; Wojciech Szczeklik; Derek K Chu; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Continuous positive airway pressure to avoid intubation in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a two-period retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Mathilde Oranger; Jésus Gonzalez-Bermejo; Philippine Dacosta-Noble; Claudia Llontop; Antoine Guerder; Valery Trosini-Desert; Morgane Faure; Mathieu Raux; Maxens Decavele; Alexandre Demoule; Capucine Morélot-Panzini; Thomas Similowski
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 16.671

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Update of the recommendations of the Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos and the Infection and Sepsis Group for the approach to COVID-19 in Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  João João Mendes; José Artur Paiva; Filipe Gonzalez; Paulo Mergulhão; Filipe Froes; Roberto Roncon; João Gouveia
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2022-01-24

2.  The utility of high-flow nasal oxygen for severe COVID-19 pneumonia in a resource-constrained setting: A multi-centre prospective observational study.

Authors:  Gregory L Calligaro; Usha Lalla; Gordon Audley; Phindile Gina; Malcolm G Miller; Marc Mendelson; Sipho Dlamini; Sean Wasserman; Graeme Meintjes; Jonathan Peter; Dion Levin; Joel A Dave; Ntobeko Ntusi; Stuart Meier; Francesca Little; Desiree L Moodley; Elizabeth H Louw; Andre Nortje; Arifa Parker; Jantjie J Taljaard; Brian W Allwood; Keertan Dheda; Coenraad F N Koegelenberg
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-10-06

3.  Predictors for inpatient mortality during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Sammartino; Farrukh Jafri; Brennan Cook; Lisa La; Hyemin Kim; John Cardasis; Joshua Raff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Update Alert 2: Ventilation Techniques and Risk for Transmission of Coronavirus Disease, Including COVID-19.

Authors:  Rebecca Thomas; Tamara Lotfi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Andrea Darzi; Marge Reinap
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 25.391

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.