Literature DB >> 32735197

California's Prisoner Protections for Family and Community Health Act : Implementing a Mandated Condom Access Program in State Prisons, 2015-2016.

Kimberley D Lucas1, Joseph Bick2, Janet C Mohle-Boetani1.   

Abstract

In 2014, California passed Assembly Bill 966, which required condom access for persons incarcerated in all 35 California state prisons (33 men's and 2 women's prisons). The California Correctional Health Care Services and the Sexually Transmitted Disease Control Branch and the Office of AIDS of the California Department of Public Health collaborated in a prison administration-led multidisciplinary implementation workgroup. Our workgroup, representing public health, correctional health, legal and legislative affairs, labor relations, and prison staff members, participated in 4 planning meetings during May-September 2015. We surveyed prison staff members and incarcerated men to identify and address potential challenges; conceptualized a tamper-resistant condom dispenser; developed educational materials, frequently asked questions for staff members, and fact sheets for the public; and conducted forums for custody and medical staff members at each prison. Key lessons learned included the need for high-level custody support, engagement of labor unions early in the decision-making process, and flexibility within defined parameters for sites to determine best practices given their unique institutional population, culture, and physical layout. Condom access was initiated at 4 prisons in July 2015 and expanded incrementally to the remaining 29 men's prisons through July 2016. A total of 243 563 condoms were accessed in the men's prisons, for an average of 354 condoms per 1000 population per month. The start-up dispenser cost was $69 825 (735 dispensers at $95 each). We estimated an annual condom cost of $0.60 per person. Although staff members and incarcerated men expressed concern that this legislation would condone sex and provide repositories for contraband, no serious adverse incidents involving condoms were reported. California demonstrated that condom access is a safe, low-cost intervention with high uptake for a large correctional system and provided a replicable implementation model for other states. Prison condom programs have the potential to decrease transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among incarcerated persons and their communities, which are often disproportionately affected by STIs, HIV, and other chronic diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV/AIDS; STD/STI; condom; correctional facilities/prisons; prevention; public health practice

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32735197      PMCID: PMC7407041          DOI: 10.1177/0033354920920629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  19 in total

1.  Acceptability of condom availability in a U.S. jail.

Authors:  John P May; Earnest L Williams
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2002-10

2.  Intraprison HIV transmission: an assessment of whether it occurs, how it occurs, and who is at risk.

Authors:  Christopher P Krebs; Melanie Simmons
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2002-10

3.  Evaluation of the condom distribution program in New South Wales Prisons, Australia.

Authors:  Kate Dolan; David Lowe; James Shearer
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  The first condom machine in a US jail: the challenge of harm reduction in a law and order environment.

Authors:  Mary Sylla; Nina Harawa; Olga Grinstead Reznick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  HIV transmission in a prison system in an Australian State.

Authors:  K A Dolan; A Wodak
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-07-05       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Syphilis outbreak at a California men's prison, 2007-2008: propagation by lapses in clinical management, case management, and public health surveillance.

Authors:  Jennifer L Brodsky; Michael C Samuel; Janet C Mohle-Boetani; Rilene Chew Ng; Jamie Miller; Janelle M Gorman; Guadalupe Espain; Gail Bolan
Journal:  J Correct Health Care       Date:  2012-09-18

7.  Sex and condom use in a large jail unit for men who have sex with men (MSM) and male-to-female transgenders.

Authors:  Nina T Harawa; Jeffery Sweat; Sheba George; Mary Sylla
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-08

8.  Updates of lifetime costs of care and quality-of-life estimates for HIV-infected persons in the United States: late versus early diagnosis and entry into care.

Authors:  Paul G Farnham; Chaitra Gopalappa; Stephanie L Sansom; Angela B Hutchinson; John T Brooks; Paul J Weidle; Vincent C Marconi; David Rimland
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex.

Authors:  Tony Butler; Juliet Richters; Lorraine Yap; Basil Donovan
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  The catch 22 of condoms in US correctional facilities.

Authors:  Joseph D Tucker; Suzanne W Chang; Jacqueline P Tulsky
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  2 in total

1.  Policy and Public Health : Reducing the Burden of Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Deron C Burton; Scott Burris; Jonathan H Mermin; David W Purcell; Sara C Zeigler; Lara Bull-Otterson; Hazel D Dean
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Characterization of Risk Factors Among Individuals with a History of Incarceration Presenting to a Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic: Implications for HIV and STI Prevention and Care.

Authors:  Matthew J Murphy; Brooke G Rogers; Laura C Chambers; Alexandra Zanowick-Marr; Drew Galipeau; Madeline Noh; Ty Scott; Siena C Napoleon; Jennifer Rose; Philip A Chan
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 5.944

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.