| Literature DB >> 32735115 |
Jamie Pethick1, Charlotte Casselton, Samantha L Winter, Mark Burnley.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Neuromuscular fatigue reduces the temporal structure, or complexity, of muscle torque output, purportedly through an effect on motor unit behavior. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC), an emerging ergogenic aid, has been demonstrated to have a potent effect on muscular output and endurance. We therefore tested the hypothesis that IPC would attenuate the fatigue-induced loss of muscle torque complexity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 32735115 PMCID: PMC7803438 DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc ISSN: 0195-9131
Effects of IPC and SHAM on voluntary torque and electrically elicited muscle contractile properties.
| SHAM | IPC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Pre | Post | Pre | Post |
| MVC, N·m | 248.1 ± 26.6 | 228.6 ± 24.7* | 249.1 ± 24.7 | 233.9 ± 24.2* |
| Doublet, N·m | 91.7 ± 9.8 | 89.6 ± 10.1 | 90.5 ± 10.3 | 86.5 ± 8.8 |
| VA, % | 92.4 ± 0.9 | 90.0 ± 5.2 | 92.7 ± 1.6 | 90.4 ± 1.6 |
Values are presented as mean ± SEM.
*Significantly different from Pre.
VA, voluntary activation.
FIGURE 1Raw torque output during contractions in the SHAM (top panels) and IPC (bottom panels) conditions from a representative participant.
Voluntary torque, potentiated doublet torque, voluntary activation, EMG, and mV˙O2 responses during contractions in the IPC and SHAM conditions.
| Parameter | SHAM | IPC |
|---|---|---|
| Time to task failure, min | 17.3 ± 4.3 | 24.7 ± 6.2# |
| Global fatigue | ||
| Preexercise MVC, N·m | 228.6 ± 24.7 | 233.9 ± 24.2 |
| Peak MVC at task failure, N·m | 126.7 ± 16.0* | 128.1 ± 17.4* |
| Mean MVC at task failure, N·m | 104.8 ± 12.6 | 108.9 ± 14.8 |
| ΔMVC/Δ | −10.2 ± 2.8 | −7.6 ± 2.0# |
| Peripheral fatigue | ||
| Preexercise doublet, N·m | 89.6 ± 9.6 | 86.5 ± 8.4 |
| Doublet at task failure, N·m | 72.2 ± 10.0* | 69.0 ± 8.0* |
| % Change at task failure | 23.2 ± 5.0 | 24.4 ± 3.6 |
| Δdoublet/Δ | −1.3 ± 0.2 | −1.4 ± 0.6 |
| Central fatigue | ||
| Preexercise VA, % | 90.0 ± 1.6 | 90.4 ± 1.5 |
| VA at task failure, % | 77.0 ± 3.0* | 75.6 ± 3.6* |
| % Change at task failure | 16. 7 ± 3.3 | 18.3 ± 4.2 |
| ΔVA/Δ | −1.2 ± 0.4 | −0.8 ± 0.2 |
| Surface EMG | ||
| arEMG at task beginning, %MVC | 41.2 ± 3.1 | 37.0 ± 2.6 |
| arEMG at isotime, %MVC | – | 57.0 ± 3.6# |
| arEMG at task failure, %MVC | 65.8 ± 5.2* | 59.8 ± 4.8* |
| ΔarEMG/Δ | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 1.8 ± 0.5 |
| mV˙O2 | ||
| mV˙O2 at task beginning, %·s−1 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± 0.3 |
| mV˙O2 at isotime, %·s−1 | – | 2.7 ± 0.3 |
| mV˙O2 at task failure, %·s−1 | 3.7 ± 0.4* | 3.1 ± 0.3* |
| ΔmV˙O2/Δ | 0.2 ± 0.05 | 0.1 ± 0.02# |
Values are presented as mean ± SEM.
Symbols indicate a statistically significant difference compared with the following: *Preexercise value/value at task beginning (2 min into exercise, to account for primary amplitude of V˙O2 response). #SHAM. Isotime in the IPC condition is compared with task failure in the SHAM condition.
VA, voluntary activation; Δ, change; t, time.
FIGURE 2The arEMG (A) and the mV˙O2 (panel B) responses to contractions performed in the IPC (black circles) and SHAM (white circles) conditions, and the group and individual rates of change in EMG (C) and mV˙O2 (D). Note that the first values in panel B are resting measurements taken before and after IPC/SHAM treatment. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. *Significantly different from SHAM.
Variability, complexity, and fractal scaling responses during contractions in the IPC and SHAM conditions.
| Parameter | SHAM | IPC |
|---|---|---|
| SD | ||
| SD at task beginning, N·m | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.2 |
| SD at isotime, N·m | – | 3.4 ± 0.6 |
| SD at task failure, N·m | 4.3 ± 0.4* | 5.0 ± 0.7* |
| ΔSD/Δ | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| CV | ||
| CV at task beginning, % | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.1 |
| CV at isotime, % | – | 3.4 ± 0.3 |
| CV at task failure, % | 5.0 ± 0.6* | 5.6 ± 0.7* |
| ΔCV/Δ | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| ApEn | ||
| ApEn at task beginning | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.02 |
| ApEn at isotime | – | 0.27 ± 0.04# |
| ApEn at task failure | 0.14 ± 0.02* | 0.16 ± 0.03* |
| ΔApEn/Δ | −0.04 ± 0.01 | −0.02 ± 0.01# |
| DFA α | ||
| DFA α at task beginning | 1.33 ± 0.05 | 1.33 ± 0.05 |
| DFA α at isotime | – | 1.43 ± 0.06 |
| DFA α at task failure | 1.53 ± 0.05* | 1.50 ± 0.06* |
| ΔDFA α /Δ | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01# |
Values are presented as mean ± SEM. Symbols indicate a statistically significant difference compared with the following: *Value at task beginning (2 min into exercise, to account for primary amplitude of V˙O2 response). #SHAM. Isotime in the IPC condition is compared with task failure in the SHAM condition.
CV, coefficient of variation; Δ, change; t, time.
FIGURE 3The ApEn (A) and the DFA α exponent (B) responses to contractions performed in the IPC (black circles) and SHAM (white circles) conditions, and the group and individual rates of change in ApEn (C) and DFA α (D). Values are presented as mean ± SEM. *Significantly different from SHAM.