| Literature DB >> 32734722 |
Jae Hyeon Han1, Sang Hoon Song2, Je Seong Lee3, Sungchan Park4, Sung Jin Kim5, Kun Suk Kim6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We compared the protective effect of additional tunica vaginalis flap coverage combined with a dartos flap against urethrocutaneous fistulas in tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty in a randomized controlled trial.Entities:
Keywords: Hypospadias; Surgical flaps; Urethra; Urinary fistula
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32734722 PMCID: PMC7458875 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20200024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Investig Clin Urol ISSN: 2466-0493
Fig. 1CONSORT 2010 flow diagram of patient recruitment and follow-up. TIP, tubularized incised plate.
Fig. 2Dartos flap-only coverage during tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. (A) Subcuticular suture was used for neourethra formation with polyglactin 910 sutures (6.0 Vicryl; Ethicon). (B) Dartos tissue was covered on the neourethra without tension. (C) Immediate postoperative photography.
Fig. 3Additional tunica vaginalis flap coverage during tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. (A) Tunica vaginalis flap was designed with rectangular shape. (B) Tunica vaginalis flap was applied on the neourethra. (C) Immediate postoperative photography.
Baseline characteristics and intraoperative finding of patients who underwent additional tunica vaginalis flap coverage compared with dartos-only coverage during TIP urethroplasty
| Variable | Additional tunica vaginalis flap coverage group (n=25) | Dartos-only coverage group (n=25) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median age at surgery (mo) | 14 (8–95) | 11 (8–25) | |
| Hypospadias type | |||
| Distal penile | 6 (24.0) | 5 (20.0) | |
| Mid penile | 5 (20.0) | 6 (24.0) | |
| Proximal penile | 7 (28.0) | 7 (28.0) | |
| Penoscrotal | 4 (16.0) | 6 (24.0) | |
| Scrotal | 3 (12.0) | 1 (4.0) | |
| Combined hydrocele | 2 (8.0) | 1 (4.0) | |
| Combined cryptorchidism | 2 (8.0) | 2 (8.0) | |
| Combined PST | 3 (12.0) | 3 (12.0) | |
| Intraoperative findings | |||
| Stretched penile length (mm) | 38.6±11.7 | 37.1±9.4 | 0.616 |
| Glans width (mm) | 12.3±2.5 | 12.7±2.2 | 0.576 |
| Urethral plate width (mm) | 4.2±1.6 | 4.4±1.5 | 0.546 |
| Curvature (°) | 29.2±17.3 | 25.2±15.8 | 0.398 |
| Neourethral length (mm) | 20.6±8.8 | 17.6±6.4 | 0.175 |
| Total anesthetic time (min) | 155±27 | 137±22 | 0.016 |
| Operative time (min) | 113±26 | 95±21 | 0.012 |
| Admission (d) | 9.1±1.3 | 8.6±1.1 | 0.157 |
Values are presented as median (range), number (%), or mean±standard deviation.
TIP, tubularized incised plate; PST, penoscrotal transposition.
Complications and PPPS scores of patients who underwent additional tunica vaginalis flap coverage compared with dartos-only coverage during TIP urethroplasty
| Variable | Additional tunica vaginalis flap coverage group (n=25) | Dartos-only coverage group (n=25) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complications | |||
| Fistula | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.0) | 0.322 |
| Meatal stenosis | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.0) | 0.322 |
| Glans dehiscence | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Skin necrosis | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Surgeon | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| PPPS score at 1 mo | |||
| Surgeon | 12.72±1.88 | 13.24±1.76 | 0.318 |
| Parent | 9.92±2.59 | 10.7±2.47 | 0.27 |
| PPPS score at 3 mo | |||
| Surgeon | 12.60±2.06 | 13.20±1.80 | 0.279 |
| Parent | 9.80±2.40 | 10.52±2.65 | 0.319 |
| PPPS score at 12 mo | |||
| Surgeon | 12.72±2.07 | 13.40±1.55 | 0.196 |
| Parent | 9.60±3.23 | 10.48±2.60 | 0.294 |
| Follow-up (mo) | 15.0±5.7 | 15.7±6.0 | 0.683 |
Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.
PPPS, Pediatric Penile Perception Scale; TIP, tubularized incised plate.