Literature DB >> 32734375

Complications in image-guided musculoskeletal injections.

John P Hynes1, Meadhbh Ni Fhlatharta2, James W Ryan2, Peter J MacMahon2,3, Stephen J Eustace2,3, Eoin C Kavanagh2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the incidence and define the nature of complications occurring following image-guided musculoskeletal injections at our institution.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing image-guided musculoskeletal injection during the study period (16/3/2016 to 24/01/2020) were included. Departmental records were reviewed to identify all patients describing possible complications following injection, what therapy was required (if any) and what the outcome was. No patients were excluded. Complications were classified as minor or major. Injections were categorised as follows: cervical spine, lumbar facet joint, lumbar nerve root, caudal epidural and 'other'. The complication rate for each individual category of procedure was compared with the combined complication rate for all other categories by constructing contingency tables and using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: A total of 8226 patients underwent image-guided musculoskeletal injections within the study period. Exactly 100 patients were identified as having reported a complication, producing an overall complication rate of 1.2%. One complication was categorised as 'major', with the patient requiring expedited surgery. The remainder (99 patients) were categorised as having experienced minor complications. The incidence of complications after 'other' injections was significantly greater than for other categories of injection (1.86%, p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in the complication rate for cervical spine (0.93%, p = 0.257), lumbar nerve root (0.85%, p = 0.401), lumbar facet joint (0.67%, p = 0.326) or caudal epidural (1.29%, p = 0.687) injections. 'Other' injections were subsequently further sub-categorised by anatomical site and imaging modality used. Glenohumeral (2.97%, p = 0.0361) and sacro-iliac (3.51%, p = 0.0498) joint injections were associated with a significantly increased risk of complications. There was no difference in the incidence of complications with fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, image-guided musculoskeletal injections are safe and well-tolerated procedures. Complications are rare, occurring in just 1.2% of patients. 99% of complications are minor, either not requiring intervention or resolving with simple supportive treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Corticosteroid; Interventional radiology; Musculoskeletal injection

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32734375     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03565-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  27 in total

Review 1.  Common injections in musculoskeletal medicine.

Authors:  Aaron J Monseau; Parminder Singh Nizran
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.907

2.  Does sonographic needle guidance affect the clinical outcome of intraarticular injections?

Authors:  Wilmer L Sibbitt; Andres Peisajovich; Adrian A Michael; Kye S Park; Randy R Sibbitt; Philip A Band; Arthur D Bankhurst
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 3.  Spine Injectables: What Is the Safest Cocktail?

Authors:  Peter J MacMahon; Ambrose J Huang; William E Palmer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  A prospective evaluation of complications of 10,000 fluoroscopically directed epidural injections.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Yogesh Malla; Bradley W Wargo; Kimberly A Cash; Vidyasagar Pampati; Bert Fellows
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Complications of fluoroscopically directed facet joint nerve blocks: a prospective evaluation of 7,500 episodes with 43,000 nerve blocks.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Yogesh Malla; Bradley W Wargo; Kimberly A Cash; Vidyasagar Pampati; Bert Fellows
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Musculoskeletal injections: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Mark B Stephens; Anthony I Beutler; Francis G O'Connor
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.292

7.  Complications and pitfalls of lumbar interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections.

Authors:  Bradly S Goodman; Lyle W F Posecion; Srinivas Mallempati; Matt Bayazitoglu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-08-15

8.  Short-term efficacy to conventional blind injection versus ultrasound-guided injection of local corticosteroids in tenosynovitis in patients with inflammatory chronic arthritis: A randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Marwin Gutierrez; Andrea Di Matteo; Marcos Rosemffet; Tomas Cazenave; Gustavo Rodriguez-Gil; Cristina Hernandez Diaz; Lucio Ventura Rios; Natalia Zamora; Maria del Carmen Gonzalez Guzman; Ignacio Carrillo; Tadashi Okano; Fausto Salaffi; Carlos Pineda
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 9.  Image-guided versus blind corticosteroid injections in adults with shoulder pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Edmund Soh; Wenyun Li; Keh Oon Ong; Wen Chen; Dianne Bautista
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Where and how to inject the knee--a systematic review.

Authors:  Nasimah Maricar; Matthew J Parkes; Michael J Callaghan; David T Felson; Terence W O'Neill
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.532

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Complications in image-guided musculoskeletal injections.

Authors:  John P Hynes; Eoin C Kavanagh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.128

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.