Literature DB >> 32734258

Acute Kidney Injury Following Encorafenib and Binimetinib for Metastatic Melanoma.

Harish Seethapathy1, Halla Bates1, Donald F Chute1, Ian Strohbehn1, Samuel Strohbehn1, Riley M Fadden2, Kerry L Reynolds2, Justine V Cohen2, Ryan J Sullivan2, Meghan E Sise1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32734258      PMCID: PMC7380350          DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Med        ISSN: 2590-0595


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Nephrotoxicity is an important adverse effect of BRAF inhibitors, a class of drugs that are a mainstay for the treatment of advanced BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma.1, 2, 3 Encorafenib, a new drug in this class, has recently been approved in combination with binimetinib, a MEK inhibitor, for patients with advanced metastatic melanoma., In the phase 1 trial of this combination, the maximum tolerated doses of encorafenib were 450 mg daily and 600 mg daily, but 450 mg became the US Food and Drug Administration–approved dose because 3 patients had unexplained acute kidney injury (AKI) at the higher dose. Up to 93% of participants in the phase 3 COLUMBUS trial of the combination in patients with advanced melanoma experienced at least a 0.3-mg/dL increase in creatinine level., We aimed to describe the incidence, timing, and clinical features of AKI in patients receiving encorafenib-binimetinib for malignant melanoma. We retrospectively analyzed data from all patients who received encorafenib-binimetinib at Partners Healthcare between 2013 and 2019. Patients were identified using the Research Patient Data Registry by both medication list and natural language processing of electronic health records searching for “encorafenib,” “binimetinib,” or “enco-bini.” Using chart review, we recorded baseline demographics, comorbid conditions, medications, laboratory studies, and encorafenib-binimetinib dose and start date. Patients were followed up for 1 year. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria were used to diagnose and grade AKI. The cause of AKI was determined by 2 nephrologists (H.S. and M.E.S.). Transient AKI was defined as AKI that resolved with supportive measures in less than 48 hours. Sustained AKI persisted longer than 48 hours despite supportive measures. Univariable logistic regression was used to compare the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics associated with AKI. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Partners Healthcare (2017P000501), and the need for informed consent was waived. Fifty-seven patients were included; average age was 60 ± 15 years, 53% were men, 89% were white, 9% had diabetes mellitus, and 53% had hypertension at baseline (Table 1). The majority (81%) of patients received encorafenib, 450 mg, daily and binimetinib, 45 mg, twice daily. Sixty-seven percent had prior immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure. Fifteen (26%) patients experienced AKI. Median time to AKI was 27 (interquartile range, 10-53) days. Among the 15 patients, the KDIGO stages of AKI severity were 53% stage 1, 20% stage 2, and 27% stage 3. Use of diuretics and higher doses of encorafenib were associated with AKI in a univariable logistic regression model.
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of Patients Receiving Encorafenib and Binimetinib by AKI Status

Baseline CharacteristicAll (N = 57)No AKI (n = 42)AKI (n = 15)P
Age, y60 (15)60 (15)64 (15)0.31
Male sex29 (53%)21 (53%)8 (53%)0.45
White race51 (89%)37 (88%)14 (93%)0.33
Pretreatment serum creatinine, mg/dL0.9 (0.2)0.9 (0.2)0.8 (0.2)0.35
Estimated glomerular filtration rate, mL/min96 (26)95 (25)98 (29)0.69
Chronic kidney disease6 (11%)5 (12%)1 (7%)0.57
Diabetes mellitus5 (9%)2 (5%)3 (20%)0.07
Hypertension30 (53%)23 (55%)7 (47%)0.59
Coronary artery disease7 (12%)4 (10%)3 (20%)0.29
Congestive heart failure2 (4%)2 (5%)0 (0%)0.39
Prior immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure38 (67%)28 (67%)10 (67%)1.00
Prior chemotherapy within 6 mo10 (18%)9 (21%)1 (7%)0.20
ACEi or ARB use9 (16%)7 (17%)2 (13%)0.76
NSAID use7 (12%)4 (10%)3 (20%)0.29
Diuretic use4 (7%)1 (2%)3 (20%)<0.01
Encorafenib dose (daily)
 ≥450 mg46 (81%)31 (74%)15 (100%)<0.01
 <450 mg11 (19%)11 (26%)0 (0%)
Binimetinib dose (daily)
 90 mg49 (86%)34 (81%)15 (100%)<0.01
 <90 mg8 (14%)8 (19%)0 (0%)

Note: Overall cohort and univariable comparison of baseline characteristics in patients with AKI compared with those without AKI. Chronic kidney disease was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Values expressed as number (percent) or mean (standard deviation). Conversion factors for units: creatinine in mg/dL to μmol/L, ×88.4.

Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients Receiving Encorafenib and Binimetinib by AKI Status Note: Overall cohort and univariable comparison of baseline characteristics in patients with AKI compared with those without AKI. Chronic kidney disease was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Values expressed as number (percent) or mean (standard deviation). Conversion factors for units: creatinine in mg/dL to μmol/L, ×88.4. Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Ten of 15 (67%) patients with AKI had transient AKI; this resulted from either side effects of BRAF inhibitor (fever, vomiting, and diarrhea) in 8 patients or from a documented infection (pyelonephritis or diverticulitis). Sustained AKI occurred in 5 (33%) patients; 3 experienced tubular toxicity attributed to encorafenib and 2 experienced AKI from tumor lysis syndrome. Sustained AKI lasted a median of 10 (range, 3-37) days. No patient had significant proteinuria (protein excretion > 0.3 g/g). Three (20%) had microscopic hematuria (>10 red blood cells per high-power field) and 2 patients had leukocyturia (>10 white blood cells per high-power field). All 3 patients with tubular toxicity had normal urine sediment without cellular casts. Eleven (73%) patients were hospitalized at the time of AKI. Four (27%) saw a nephrologist. None of the patients underwent kidney biopsy. The majority required dose reduction or treatment discontinuation (66%). Five (33%) patients continued full-dose encorafenib with eventual resolution of AKI with supportive care. Kidney function recovered to within 0.3 mg/dL of pre-AKI baseline in all but 2 patients. The 6-month mortality was 27% for patients with AKI and 14% for patients without AKI. Nephrotoxicity is a common and important side effect of encorafenib-binimetinib treatment. Twenty-six percent of patients experienced clinically significant AKI, at a median of 27 days after starting therapy. The majority required hospitalization and dose reduction or treatment discontinuation due to AKI. We have determined that the clinical features of AKI in patients receiving encorafenib-binimetinib ranged from transient AKI resolving with hemodynamic support to sustained AKI events likely due to tubular nephrotoxicity or tumor lysis syndrome. This is consistent with kidney biopsy findings from patients receiving other BRAF inhibitors showing acute and chronic tubular injury as the dominant finding, though interstitial nephritis may be concurrently found., The incidence of AKI with encorafenib-binimetinib may be lower than in patients receiving other BRAF inhibitors; a retrospective analysis of 74 patients with melanoma receiving vemurafenib demonstrated 60% incidence of at least stage 1 AKI. Our main limitations were the small sample size with only limited numbers experiencing sustained AKI and lack of biopsy-confirmed diagnosis, relying on retrospective adjudication by 2 nephrologists. In conclusion, oncologists and nephrologists should be aware of the substantial incidence of clinically significant AKI with encorafenib-binimetinib. It is reassuring that the majority of AKI was transient and almost all patients had recovery to their baseline. However, patients frequently required hospitalization and treatment interruption or discontinuation; this may lead to higher treatment failure rates and mortality. Future studies are needed to help improve AKI risk stratification for patients receiving BRAF inhibitor therapies for melanoma and other cancers.
  5 in total

1.  Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Reinhard Dummer; Paolo A Ascierto; Helen J Gogas; Ana Arance; Mario Mandala; Gabriella Liszkay; Claus Garbe; Dirk Schadendorf; Ivana Krajsova; Ralf Gutzmer; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Caroline Dutriaux; Jan Willem B de Groot; Naoya Yamazaki; Carmen Loquai; Laure A Moutouh-de Parseval; Michael D Pickard; Victor Sandor; Caroline Robert; Keith T Flaherty
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Reinhard Dummer; Paolo A Ascierto; Helen J Gogas; Ana Arance; Mario Mandala; Gabriella Liszkay; Claus Garbe; Dirk Schadendorf; Ivana Krajsova; Ralf Gutzmer; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Caroline Dutriaux; Jan Willem B de Groot; Naoya Yamazaki; Carmen Loquai; Laure A Moutouh-de Parseval; Michael D Pickard; Victor Sandor; Caroline Robert; Keith T Flaherty
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Acute renal failure associated with the new BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib: a case series of 8 patients.

Authors:  Vincent Launay-Vacher; Sarah Zimner-Rapuch; Nicolas Poulalhon; Thibault Fraisse; Valérie Garrigue; Morgane Gosselin; Sabine Amet; Nicolas Janus; Gilbert Deray
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  New insights into renal toxicity of the B-RAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Cécile Teuma; Marie Perier-Muzet; Solenne Pelletier; Mathilde Nouvier; Mona Amini-Adl; Frédérique Dijoud; Gérard Duru; Luc Thomas; Denis Fouque; Maurice Laville; Stéphane Dalle
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  Renal effects of BRAF inhibitors: a systematic review by the Cancer and the Kidney International Network.

Authors:  Rimda Wanchoo; Kenar D Jhaveri; Gilbert Deray; Vincent Launay-Vacher
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2016-01-18
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Clinical features of acute kidney injury in patients receiving dabrafenib and trametinib.

Authors:  Harish Seethapathy; Meghan D Lee; Ian A Strohbehn; Orhan Efe; Nifasha Rusibamayila; Donald F Chute; Robert B Colvin; Ivy A Rosales; Riley M Fadden; Kerry L Reynolds; Ryan J Sullivan; Howard L Kaufman; Kenar D Jhaveri; Meghan E Sise
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.992

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.