| Literature DB >> 32734053 |
Shashi Sharma1, Dinesh Kumar Singh2, Yam Bahadur Gurung2, Swoyam Prakash Shrestha1, Chiranjibi Pantha2.
Abstract
A study was conducted to identify the immunomodulatory effect of Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis) in broiler chicken. A total of 240 birds were divided into 4 treatment groups with 4 replications in each group, each replication containing 15 birds. Treatments were comprised of no Nettle and Aloe vera (T0); Nettle 5% (T1), Aloe vera @5 ml/lit drinking water (T2) and Nettle 5% and Aloe vera @5 ml/lit drinking water (T3). The study was conducted under a randomized design. The immunomodulating effect was evaluated by measuring antibody titer against NDV vaccine; and by estimating the albumin, globulin and total protein upto 40 days of age. The effect on liver was estimated by measuring liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The hypoglycemic effect was estimated by measuring glucose level in the serum, and morphological changes in the spleen and bursa were estimated by measuring the ratio score of the respective organs to the body weight. Throughout the experiment, the value for HI titer, albumin, globulin, total protein, spleen weight ratio score, bursa weight ratio score, liver function test and blood glucose of all treatment group were non significant (p > 0.05) except for albumin on 10th day, globulin on 0th day, total protein on 0th day and ratio score of spleen were found to be significant (p ≤ 0.05) at 30 days in all treatment compared to control group. Histopathology of spleen and bursa appeared normal in all treatment and control groups. Result thus suggests that nettle and Aloe vera have non-significant immunomodulatory effects.Entities:
Keywords: Aloe vera; Broiler; Immunomodulatory; Stinging nettle; Total protein
Year: 2018 PMID: 32734053 PMCID: PMC7386742 DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2018.07.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Anim Sci ISSN: 2451-943X
Nomenclature and distribution of four treatments groups.
| T0 | Basal diet with no nettle and Aloe vera |
|---|---|
| T1 | Basal diet with Nettle 5% in feed |
| T2 | Basal diet with Aloe vera @ 5 ml/ lit i.e. (0.5%) drinking water per day |
| T3 | Basal diet with Nettle (5%) in feed + Aloe vera @ 5 ml/ lit i.e. (0.5%) drinking water per day |
Various activities within the samples collection.
| Activities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (days) | T3 | T2 | T1 | T0 |
| Nettle (5%) in feed + Aloe vera 5 ml/ lit | Aloe vera 5 ml/ lit | Nettle (5%) in feed | Control | |
| 0 | Samples collected before experimentation (Blood, bursa and spleen) | Samples collected before experimentation (Blood, bursa and spleen) | Samples collected before experimentation (Blood, bursa and spleen) | Samples collected before experimentation(Blood, bursa and spleen) |
| 10 | Blood, bursa and spleen) | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen |
| 20 | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen |
| 30 | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen |
| 40 | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen | Blood, bursa and spleen |
Effect of stinging nettle and Aloe vera levels on log 2 HI titres (Mean ± SD) against ND at different days of age of broilers.
| Treatments | Days (Mean ± SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | |
| T0: Basal diet with no Nettle and Aloe vera | 11.79 ± 4.18 | 32.57 ± 3.32 | 17.60 ± 8.13 | 27.57 ± 0 |
| T1: Basal diet with Nettle 5% in feed | 12.62 ± 1.91 | 18.43 ± 8.73 | 22.59 ± 1.91 | 20.93 ± 8.13 |
| T2: Basal diet with Aloe vera @ 5 ml / lit i.e. (0.5%) drinking water/day | 12.62 ± 5.75 | 23.42 ± 10.63 | 26.74 ± 4.98 | 26.74 ± 1.66 |
| T3: Basal diet with Nettle (5%) in feed + Aloe vera @ 5 ml/lit i.e. (0.5%) drinking water/day | 9.30 ± 3.32 | 29.23 ± 4.28 | 23.42 ± 8.73 | 25.91 ± 5.75 |
| 0.62ns | 0.08ns | 0.30ns | 0.29ns | |
Means in column with different superscripts are significantly different. ssignificant at 5% (p < 0.05); nsnon significantly different.
Effect of stinging nettle and Aloe vera feeding on albumin levels (Mean ± SD) in serum at different days of broilers.
| Treatments | Days (Mean ± SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | |
| T0 | 0.6 ± 0 | 0.63 ± 0.13 | 1.54 ± 0.32 | 1.54 ± 0.17 | 1.68 ± 0.24 |
| T1 | 0.9 ± 0.56 | 0.69 ± 0.53 | 1.47 ± 0.24 | 1.45 ± 0.16 | 2.04 ± 0.57 |
| T2 | 1.11 ± 1.12 | 1.31 ± 0.26 | 1.41 ± 0.23 | 1.33 ± 0.17 | 1.48 ± 0.14 |
| T3 | 1.02 ± 0.12 | 1.30 ± 0.21 | 1.34 ± 0.18 | 1.25 ± 0.82 | 1.84 ± 0.10 |
| 0.68ns | 0.01s | 0.72ns | 0.79ns | 0.14ns | |
Means in column with different superscripts are significantly different. significant at 5% (p < 0.05); nsnon significantly different.
Effect of stinging nettle and Aloe vera feeding on serum globulin levels (Mean ± SD) on different days of broilers.
| Treatments | Days (Mean ± SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | |
| T0 | 5.4 ± 1.41 | 2.59 ± 0.48 | 2.53 ± 0.25 | 2.62 ± 0.45 | 2.29 ± 0.38 |
| T1 | 3.6 ± 1.27 | 3.13 ± 0.64 | 2.43 ± 0.08 | 2.77 ± 0.20 | 2.18 ± 0.46 |
| T2 | 2.9 ± 1.3 | 1.83 ± 1.02 | 2.59 ± 0.42 | 2.69 ± 0.33 | 2.71 ± 0.13 |
| T3 | 2.38 ± 1.63 | 2.34 ± 1.00 | 2.75 ± 0.09 | 2.74 ± 0.62 | 2.35 ± 0.30 |
| 0.05s | 0.22ns | 0.36ns | 0.96ns | 0.19ns | |
Means in column with different superscripts are significantly different. ssignificant at 5% (p < 0.05); nsnon significantly different.
Effect of stinging nettle and Aloe vera on total protein levels (Mean ± SD) in serum at different days of broilers.
| Treatment | Days (Mean ± SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | |
| T0 | 6 ± 1.41 | 3.22 ± 0.53 | 4.07 ± 0.09 | 4.17 ± 0.35 | 3.97 ± 0.35 |
| T1 | 4.5 ± 0.70 | 3.82 ± 0.51 | 3.9 ± 0.21 | 4.22 ± 0.05 | 4.22 ± 0.17 |
| T2 | 4 ± 0.17 | 3.15 ± 1.17 | 4 ± 0.23 | 4.02 ± 0.35 | 4.2 ± 0.18 |
| T3 | 3.4 ± 1.50 | 3 ± 1.46 | 4.1 ± 0.14 | 4.25 ± 0.17 | 4.2 ± 0.23 |
| 0.03s | 0.67ns | 0.45ns | 0.63ns | 0.45ns | |
Means in column with different superscripts are significantly different. ssignificant at 5% (p < 0.05); nsnon significantly different.
Effect of stinging nettle and Aloe vera feeding on spleen weight ratio score (Mean ± SD) at different days of age of broilers.
| Treatment | Days (Mean ± SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | |
| T0 | 0.32 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.19 | 0.48 ± 0.12 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.03 |
| T1 | 0.60 ± 0.18 | 0.75 ± 0.31 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
| T2 | 0.61 ± 0.09 | 0.79 ± 0.18 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.10 ± 0.00 |
| T3 | 0.76 ± 0.51 | 0.91 ± 0.42 | 0.61 ± 0.15 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
| 0.22ns | 0.33ns | 0.13ns | 0.02s | 0.21ns | |
Means in column with different superscripts are significantly different. ssignificant at 5% (p < 0.05); nsnon significantly different.
Effect of stinging nettle and Aloe vera feeding on bursa weight ratio score (Mean ± SD) at different days of age of broilers.
| Treatment | Days (Mean ± SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | |
| T0 | 1.14 ± 0.58 | 1.99 ± 0.07 | 2.20 ± 0.60 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
| T1 | 1.33 ± 0.06 | 1.76 ± 0.49 | 2.15 ± 0.46 | 0.21 ± 0.08 | 0.17 ± 0.03 |
| T2 | 1.15 ± 0.28 | 1.93 ± 0.16 | 2.11 ± 0.29 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.03 |
| T3 | 1.15 ± 0.39 | 1.69 ± 0.26 | 1.62 ± 0.42 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.19 ± 0.03 |
| 0.87ns | 0.45ns | 0.29ns | 0.18ns | 0.25ns | |
Means in column with different superscripts are significantly different. ssignificant at 5% (p < 0.05); nsnon significantly different.
Effect of stinging nettle and Aloe vera feeding on ALT levels (Mean ± SD) in serum at different days of broilers.
| Treatment | Days (Mean ± SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | |
| T0 | 110± | 119 ± 1.73 | 117.5 ± 37.74 | 81.5 ± 41.93 | 109 ± 4.24 |
| T1 | 106± | 110 ± 14.14 | 124.5 ± 41.93 | 107.33 ± 24.02 | 62.66 ± 24.44 |
| T2 | 100± | 73.75 ± 32.23 | 90 ± 42 | 70.5 ± 46.85 | 58.25 ± 42.16 |
| T3 | 110± | 102.66 ± 47.93 | 101.33 ± 42.01 | 77.75 ± 38.87 | 88 ± 33.94 |
| NA | 0.21ns | 0.64ns | 0.58ns | 0.10ns | |
Means in column with different superscripts are significantly different. ssignificant at 5% (p < 0.05); nsnon significantly different.
Effect of Stinging nettle and Aloe vera feeding on blood glucose levels (Mean ± SD) in serum at different days of broilers.
| Treatment | Days (mean ± SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | |
| T0 | NA | 46.24 ± 86.61 | 137.31 ± 31.28 | 144.59 ± 39.31 | 98.37 ± 51.65 |
| T1 | 13.81 ± 19.53 | 32.39 ± 81.01 | 82.00 ± 82.08 | 153.00 ± 33.04 | 115.08 ± 27.84 |
| T2 | 47.18 ± 73.72 | 88.06 ± 101.73 | 114.94 ± 70.65 | 133.98 ± 70.65 | 101.22 ± 30.81 |
| T3 | NA | 11.14 ± 102.34ss | 83.22 ± 72.48 | 127.45 ± 37.82 | 83.74 ± 51.15 |
| NA | NA | 0.60ns | 0.87ns | 0.77ns | |
Means in column with different superscripts are significantly different. ssignificant at 5% (p < 0.05); nsnon significantly different.
Fig.1Cortex () and medulla (→) well filled with lymphoid cells and clearly distinguishable (H & E), 100X.
Fig.2Scant interfollicular space () the bursal epithelium is regular and a few cells thick (→) and, (H&E) 40 X.