Literature DB >> 32733983

Safety and Efficacy of Casting during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of Polymers Used for 3D Printing to Conventional Materials Used for the Generation of Orthopaedic Orthoses.

Ashkan Sedigh1,2, Amir R Kachooei1,2, Pedro K Beredjiklian3,4, Alexander R Vaccaro3,5, Michael Rivlin3,2.   

Abstract

To reduce the risk of spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), the emerging protocols are advising for less physician-patient contact, shortening the contact time, and keeping a safe distance. It is recommended that unnecessary casting be avoided in the events that alternative methods can be applied such as in stable ankle fractures, and hindfoot/midfoot/forefoot injuries. Fiberglass casts are suboptimal because they require a follow up for cast removal while a conventional plaster cast is amenable to self-removal by submerging in water and cutting the cotton bandages with scissors. At present, only fiberglass casts are widely available to allow waterproof casting. To reduce the contact time during casting, a custom-made 3D printed casts/splints can be ordered remotely which reduces the number of visits and shortens the contact time while it allows for self-removal by the patient. The cast is printed after the limb is 3D scanned in 5-10 seconds using the commercially available 3D scanners. In contrast to the conventional casting, a 3D printed cast/splint is washable which is an advantage during an infectious crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D Printing; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Orthopaedic cast; Orthopaedic splint

Year:  2020        PMID: 32733983      PMCID: PMC7296609          DOI: 10.22038/abjs.2020.44038.2204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  3 in total

1.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Fiberglass Casts and 3-Dimensional-Printed, Open-Latticed, Ventilated Casts.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Riley Knox; Kara Tanaka; Zachary M Working; Ashraf N El Naga; Safa Herfat; Nicolas Lee
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-02-27

2.  Design of an Orthopedic Product by Using Additive Manufacturing Technology: The Arm Splint.

Authors:  Fernando Blaya; Pilar San Pedro; Julia López Silva; Roberto D'Amato; Enrique Soriano Heras; Juan Antonio Juanes
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Environmentally degradable bio-based polymeric blends and composites.

Authors:  Emo Chiellini; Patrizia Cinelli; Federica Chiellini; Syed H Imam
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 4.979

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Leveraging Digital Technology to Overcome Barriers in the Prosthetic and Orthotic Industry: Evaluation of its Applicability and Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Trevor Binedell; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Yoko Wong; Lucienne T M Blessing
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2020-11-05

2.  3D-printed graphene polylactic acid devices resistant to SARS-CoV-2: Sunlight-mediated sterilization of additive manufactured objects.

Authors:  Flavio De Maio; Enrico Rosa; Giordano Perini; Alberto Augello; Benedetta Niccolini; Francesca Ciaiola; Giulia Santarelli; Francesca Sciandra; Manuela Bozzi; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Michela Sali; Marco De Spirito; Giovanni Delogu; Valentina Palmieri; Massimiliano Papi
Journal:  Carbon N Y       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 11.307

3.  Evaluation and Comparison of Traditional Plaster and Fiberglass Casts with 3D-Printed PLA and PLA-CaCO3 Composite Splints for Bone-Fracture Management.

Authors:  Ádám Tibor Schlégl; Roland Told; Kinga Kardos; András Szőke; Zoltan Ujfalusi; Péter Maróti
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.967

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.