Literature DB >> 32733974

Stiffness-mediated mesenchymal stem cell fate decision in 3D-bioprinted hydrogels.

Yufan Liu1,2, Zhao Li1,2, Jianjun Li1,2, Siming Yang1,2, Yijie Zhang1,2, Bin Yao1,2, Wei Song1,2, Xiaobing Fu1,2, Sha Huang1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hydrogels with tuneable mechanical properties are an attractive material platform for 3D bioprinting. Thus far, numerous studies have confirmed that the biophysical cues of hydrogels, such as stiffness, are known to have a profound impact on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation; however, their differentiation potential within 3D-bioprinted hydrogels is not completely understood. Here, we propose a protocol for the exploration of how the stiffness of alginate-gelatin (Alg-Gel) composite hydrogels (the widely used bioink) affects the differentiation of MSCs in the presence or absence of differentiation inducing factors.
METHODS: Two types of Alg-Gel composite hydrogels (Young's modulus: 50 kPa vs. 225 kPa) were bioprinted independently of porosity. Then, stiffness-induced biases towards adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of the embedded MSCs were analysed by co-staining with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and oil red O. The expression of specific markers at the gene level was detected after a 3-day culture.
RESULTS: Confocal microscopy indicated that all tested hydrogels supported MSC growth and viability during the culture period. Higher expression of adipogenic and osteogenic markers (ALP and lipoprotein lipase (LPL)) in stiffer 3D-bioprinted matrices demonstrated a more significant response of MSCs to stiffer hydrogels with respect to differentiation, which was more robust in differentiation-inducing medium. However, the LPL expression in stiffer 3D-bioprinted constructs was reduced at day 3 regardless of the presence of differentiation-inducing factors. Although MSCs embedded in softer hydrogels to some extent proceeded toward adipogenic and osteogenic lineages within a few days, their differentiation seemed to be slower and more limited. Interestingly, the hydrogel itself (without differentiation-inducing factors) exhibited a slight effect on whether MSCs differentiated towards an adipogenic or an osteogenic fate. Considering that the mechano-regulated protein Yes-associated protein (YAP) is involved in MSC fate decisions, we further found that inhibition of YAP significantly downregulated the expression of ALP and LPL in MSCs in stiffer constructs regardless of the induced growth factors present.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the differentiation of MSCs in 3D-bioprinted matrices is dependent on hydrogel stiffness, which emphasizes the importance of biophysical cues as a determinant of cellular behaviour.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-bioprinting; Adipogenesis; Differentiation; Osteogenesis; Stiffness; mesenchymal stem cells

Year:  2020        PMID: 32733974      PMCID: PMC7382973          DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns Trauma        ISSN: 2321-3868


  46 in total

1.  Matrix compliance and RhoA direct the differentiation of mammary progenitor cells.

Authors:  Cecillia Lui; KangAe Lee; Celeste M Nelson
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2011-12-10

2.  Microstructure and in vitro cellular response to novel soy protein-based porous structures for tissue regeneration applications.

Authors:  Hilla Olami; Meital Zilberman
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 2.646

3.  Three-dimensional bioprinting of embryonic stem cells directs highly uniform embryoid body formation.

Authors:  Liliang Ouyang; Rui Yao; Shuangshuang Mao; Xi Chen; Jie Na; Wei Sun
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 9.954

4.  Properties of an alginate-gelatin-based bioink and its potential impact on cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation.

Authors:  Liuhanghang Cheng; Bin Yao; Tian Hu; Xiaoli Cui; Xuan Shu; Shijie Tang; Rui Wang; Yihui Wang; Yufan Liu; Wei Song; Xiaobing Fu; Haihong Li; Sha Huang
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 6.953

5.  The pericellular environment regulates cytoskeletal development and the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and determines their response to hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  A J Steward; D R Wagner; D J Kelly
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 6.  Biomaterials-based 3D cell printing for next-generation therapeutics and diagnostics.

Authors:  Jinah Jang; Ju Young Park; Ge Gao; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  α-Catenin-dependent cytoskeletal tension controls Yap activity in the heart.

Authors:  Alexia Vite; Caimei Zhang; Roslyn Yi; Sabrina Emms; Glenn L Radice
Journal:  Development       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 8.  Skin bioprinting: the future of burn wound reconstruction?

Authors:  Mathew Varkey; Dafydd O Visscher; Paul P M van Zuijlen; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2019-02-12

9.  YAP, ΔNp63, and β-Catenin Signaling Pathways Are Involved in the Modulation of Corneal Epithelial Stem Cell Phenotype Induced by Substrate Stiffness.

Authors:  Ricardo M Gouveia; Flora Vajda; Jason A Wibowo; Francisco Figueiredo; Che J Connon
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels.

Authors:  Sudhir Khetan; Murat Guvendiren; Wesley R Legant; Daniel M Cohen; Christopher S Chen; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review on the application of 3D-bioprinting technology in orthoregeneration: current achievements and open challenges.

Authors:  Rachel L Pan; Kari Martyniak; Makan Karimzadeh; David G Gelikman; Jonathan DeVries; Kelly Sutter; Melanie Coathup; Mehdi Razavi; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Thomas J Kean
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-09-19

2.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Hydrogel Microspheres System for Bone Regeneration in Calvarial Defects.

Authors:  Chong Teng; Zhicheng Tong; Qiulin He; Huangrong Zhu; Lu Wang; Xianzhu Zhang; Wei Wei
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 3.  3D-bioprinted microenvironments for sweat gland regeneration.

Authors:  Wei Song; Bin Yao; Dongzhen Zhu; Yijie Zhang; Zhao Li; Sha Huang; Xiaobing Fu
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 4.  Redox Control of the Dormant Cancer Cell Life Cycle.

Authors:  Bowen Li; Yichun Huang; Hui Ming; Edouard C Nice; Rongrong Xuan; Canhua Huang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  A Review on the Design of Hydrogels With Different Stiffness and Their Effects on Tissue Repair.

Authors:  Tianyi Luo; Bowen Tan; Lengjing Zhu; Yating Wang; Jinfeng Liao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 6.  Tailoring bioinks of extrusion-based bioprinting for cutaneous wound healing.

Authors:  Yuzhen Wang; Xingyu Yuan; Bin Yao; Shuoji Zhu; Ping Zhu; Sha Huang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-01-29

7.  Three-Dimensional Printing Self-Healing Dynamic/Photocrosslinking Gelatin-Hyaluronic Acid Double-Network Hydrogel for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Yunping Wang; Yazhen Chen; Jianuo Zheng; Lingrong Liu; Qiqing Zhang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 8.  Strategies for improving adipose-derived stem cells for tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Xin Yuan; Li Li; Haofan Liu; Jing Luo; Yongchao Zhao; Cheng Pan; Xue Zhang; Yuwen Chen; Maling Gou
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2022-08-16

Review 9.  Adipogenesis or osteogenesis: destiny decision made by mechanical properties of biomaterials.

Authors:  Ting Su; Mimi Xu; Feng Lu; Qiang Chang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.036

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.