| Literature DB >> 32733956 |
Yan Guo1, Xiaobo Xu1, Jingyi Huang2, Zhen Wang1, Zhenzhong Li1, Zhen Liu1.
Abstract
The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (BTZ) is a potent first-line anticancer drug for multiple myeloma; nonetheless, it induced peripheral neuropathy. It has been suggested that many cytokines may play a role in mediating neuropathic pain, but the underlying molecular mechanism is not fully understood. Recent studies have shown that neuropathic pain is closely related to the purinergic ligand-gated ion channel 7 receptor (P2X7R), one of the P2X receptors, which is richly expressed in glial cells. P2X7-p38 pathway is correlated with microglia- and satellite glial cell- (SGC-) mediated neuropathic pain. However, the association of P2X7R and p38MAPK in mediating BTZ-induced neuropathic pain remains unclear. In this study, the relationship between P2X7R activation and p38 phosphorylation in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal dorsal horn (SDH) in the development and maintenance of BTZ-induced neuropathic pain was elucidated. The results showed that BTZ increased mechanical thresholds in rats, accompanied with upregulation of P2X7R expression and p38MAPK phosphorylation, indicating that P2X7R and p38MAPK are key molecules in the development and maintenance of BTZ-induced neuropathic pain. Inhibiting p38MAPK phosphorylation with SB203580 resulted in downregulation of P2X7R expression levels. Inhibition of P2X7R with Brilliant Blue G (BBG) reversed neuropathic pain might decrease through the expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and IL-6 via inhibiting p38MAPK phosphorylation. The P2X7R/p38MAPK signaling pathway in SGCs of DRG and microglia of SDH might be a potential pharmacological target behind this mechanism as an opportunity to relieve BTZ-induced neuropathic pain.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32733956 PMCID: PMC7376423 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8143754
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
The sequences of oligonucleotide primers.
| Genes | Primer sequences |
|---|---|
| P2X7R | 5′-CTACTCTTCGGTGGGGGCTT-3′ (coding sense) |
| 5′-CTCTGGATCCGGGTGACTTT-3′ (coding antisense) | |
| IL-1 | 5′-GGAAGGCAGTGTCACTCATTGTG-3′ (coding sense) |
| 5′-GGTCCTCATCCTGGAAGCTCC-3′ (coding antisense) | |
| IL-6 | 5′-GGGACTGATGTTGTTGACAGCC-3′ (coding sense) |
| 5′-CATATGTAATTAAGCCTCCGACTTGTG-3′ (coding antisense) | |
| TNF- | 5′'-CCCCGACTATGTGCTCCTCAC-3′ (coding sense) |
| 5′-AGGGCTCTTGATGGCGGA-3′ (coding antisense) | |
| p38 | 5′-CTGCGAGGGCTGAAGTAT-3′ (coding sense) |
| 5′-TCCTCTTATCCGAGTCCAA-3′ (coding antisense) | |
| GAPDH | 5′-TCCCTCAAGATTGTCAGCAA-3′ (coding sense) |
| 5′-AGATCCACAACGGATACATT-3′ (coding antisense) |
The antibodies for immunoblotting.
| Category | Antibodies | Concentration | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Rabbit anti-p-p38 monoclonal IgG | 1 : 1000 | Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA |
| Primary | Rabbit anti-P2X7R monoclonal IgG | 1 : 1000 | Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel |
| Primary | Rabbit anti-GAPDH monoclonal IgG | 1 : 1000 | Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA |
| Primary | Mouse anti- | 1 : 5000 | Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA |
| Secondary | Goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP | 1 : 5000 | Beijing Sequoia Jinqiao Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China |
| Secondary | Goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP | 1 : 5000 | Beijing Sequoia Jinqiao Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China |
The antibodies for fluorescence labeling.
| Category | Antibodies | Concentration | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Rabbit anti-P2X7R monoclonal IgG | 1 : 400 | Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel |
| Primary | Rabbit anti-p-p38 monoclonal IgG | 1 : 100 | Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA |
| Primary | Chicken anti-NF-200 monoclonal IgG | 1 : 1000 | Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA |
| Primary | Mouse anti-F4/80 monoclonal IgG | 1 : 100 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA |
| Primary | Mouse anti-Iba-1 monoclonal IgG | 1 : 200 | Abcam, Cambridge, MA |
| Primary | Mouse anti-GFAP monoclonal IgG | 1 : 500 | Abcam, Cambridge, MA |
| Secondary | Goat anti-rabbit IgG-TRITC | 1 : 200 | Beijing Sequoia Jinqiao Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China |
| Secondary | Goat anti-chicken IgG-FITC | 1 : 200 | Beijing Sequoia Jinqiao Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China |
| Secondary | Goat anti-mouse IgG-TRITC | 1 : 200 | Beijing Sequoia Jinqiao Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China |
| Secondary | Goat anti-mouse IgG-FITC | 1 : 500 | Beijing Sequoia Jinqiao Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China |
Figure 1Mechanical threshold and P2X7R and p-p38 expression. (a) Mechanical threshold after BTZ injection. (b, c) Western blot for P2X7R expression after BTZ treatment. (d) Immunofluorescence location of P2X7R in DRG. The arrows indicate the typical single- or double-labeled DRG neurons and satellite cells. P2X7R is not expressed in NF-200-positive neurons. P2X7R is expressed in GFAP-labeled satellite glial cells (SGCs). (e) Immunofluorescence location of p-p38 in DRG. The arrows indicate the typical single- or double-labeled DRG neurons and satellite cells. p-p38 is expressed in both MAP2-labeled neurons and GFAP-labeled SGCs. (f) Immunofluorescence location of P2X7R in SDH. The arrows indicate the typical single-labeled and double-labeled cells in SDH. P2X7R is expressed mainly in Iba-1-labeled microglial cells rather than in GFAP-labeled astrocytes and MAP2-labeled neurons. (g) Immunofluorescence location of p-p38 in SDH. The arrows indicate the typical single-labeled and double-labeled cells in SDH. p-p38 is expressed mainly in Iba-1-labeled microglial cells. Scale bar = 50 μm. Mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 2p38 mRNA expression and p38 phosphorylation in DRG after inhibition of P2X7R with BBG. (a) p38 mRNA levels. (b) p-p38 protein immunoblotting bands. (c) p-p38 protein levels. (d) p-p38 immunofluorescence labeling. The arrows show the typical p-p38 single-labeled DRG cells. (e) p-p38 fluorescence density. Scale bar = 50 μm. Mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 3p38 mRNA expression and p38 phosphorylation in SDH after inhibition of P2X7R with BBG. (a) p38 mRNA levels. (b) p-p38 protein immunoblotting bands. (c) p-p38 protein levels. (d) P2X7R and p-p38 coexpression fluorescence labeling. The arrows indicate the typical single-labeled and double-labeled SDH microglia. (e) P2X7R and p-p38 coexpression fluorescence density. Scale bar = 50 μm. Mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 4IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α mRNA expression in DRG and SDH after inhibition of P2X7R. (a) DRG IL-1β mRNA. (b) DRG IL-6 mRNA. (c) DRG TNF-α mRNA. (d) SDH IL-1β mRNA. (e) SDH IL-6 mRNA. (f) SDH TNF-α mRNA. Mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 5P2X7R mRNA and protein expression in DRG after inhibition of p38 phosphorylation. (a) P2X7R mRNA levels. (b) P2X7R protein immunoblotting bands. (c) P2X7R protein levels. (d) P2X7R and GFAP coexpression fluorescence labeling for SGCs. The arrows indicate the typical single-labeled and double-labeled DRG satellite cells. (e) P2X7R and GFAP coexpression fluorescence density. Scale bar = 50 μm. Mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 6P2X7R mRNA and protein expression in SDH after inhibition of p38 phosphorylation. (a) P2X7R mRNA levels. (b) P2X7R protein immunoblotting bands. (c) P2X7R protein levels. (d) P2X7R and p-p38 coexpression fluorescence labeling. The arrows indicate the typical single-labeled and double-labeled SDH microglia. (e) P2X7R and p-p38 colocalization fluorescence density. Scale bar = 50 μm. Mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 7IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α mRNA expression in DRG and SDH after inhibition of p38 phosphorylation. (a) DRG IL-1β mRNA. (b) DRG IL-6 mRNA. (c) DRG TNF-α mRNA. (d) SDH IL-1β mRNA. (e) SDH IL-6 mRNA. (f) SDH TNF-α mRNA. Mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 8Mechanical threshold alterations after inhibition of P2X7R or p38. (a) Mechanical threshold after inhibition of P2X7R. (b) Mechanical threshold after inhibition of p38. Mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (vs. control); #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01 (vs. BTZ group).