Literature DB >> 32733754

As a Rare Reason of Alveolar Consolidation, Negative Pressure Pulmonary Edema: Case Report.

Muhammet Ahmet Karakaya1, Afak Durur Karakaya2.   

Abstract

In this paper we describe two cases with negative pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE). Excessive negative airway pressures against an obstructed airway has been reported to cause fluid filtration into alveoli and lung edema. The patients are generally young adults without any medical problems. The condition involves central interstitial area of both lungs and is treated by nonnvasive mechanical ventilation and corticosteroids. Copyright Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pulmonary edema; alveolar consolidation; computed tomography

Year:  2020        PMID: 32733754      PMCID: PMC7384492          DOI: 10.5222/MMJ.2020.73693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medeni Med J        ISSN: 2149-4606


Introduction

Negative pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE) is a rare reason of acute respiratory failure and alveolar consolidation. In patients with NPPE, there are patchy non-segmental alveolar consolidations in central distribution on CT. In alveolar pattern, filling of the alveolar spaces with pus, edema, hemorrhage, inflammation or tumor cells are seen. NPPE is one of the illnesses which induces an alveolar pattern. In this paper, we aimed to present two patients who developed acute respiratory failure due to NPLE after general anesthesia.

Case 1

A 25-year-old man was admitted to our hospital due to perianal abscess and operated. His BMI was 27 klg/m[2] and he had ASA II score due to anemia. Preoperatively, his chest examination results were normal, and a chest radiograph indicated clear lung fields. Standard monitorization of the patient was performed with electrocardiogram, noninvasive arterial blood pressure measurement and pulse oximetry. According to anesthesia induction protocol, 1.5 μg/kg fentanyl, 2 mg/kg propofol and 1 mg/kg rocuronium bromide were used after satisfactory muscular relaxation an orotracheal intubation was performed with an 8-mm-thick cuffed tube. The patient was ventilated with a 550 ml tidal volume in order to ensure 14 respirations per minute in a volume control mode. The respiratory parameters were set in order to have a CO2 end-tidal level between 35-40 mmHg. Anesthesia was maintained by providing fresh gas of 1-2% minimally alveolar consolidation (MAC) sevoflurane and 50% O2-air with 3 L/min. The surgery lasted for about 60 minutes. In the operation, 800 mL crystalloid (0.9% NaCl) infusion was made. The procedure was terminated without any complications. When enough respiratory depth was reached, severe agitation, laryngospasm and inspiratory effort developed following extubation. Negative pressure pulmonary edema was suspected due to the presence of foamy, pink colored, bloody secretion, auscultating common rales in both lungs, and oxygen-free saturation values of 86 percent. The patient was given oxygen and taken to intensive care unit for postoperative follow-up. In the first blood gas sample taken in the intensive care unit, pH was measured as 7.32, pO2: 53 mmHg, pCO2: 33 mmHg, HCO3: 18 mmol/L Lactate: 1.2 mmol/L. The patient did not need intubation and we performed NIMV with pressure mode and PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure). In computed tomography of the patient, there were ground-glass opacifications and alveolar consolidations which were denser in the central interstitial area of both lungs. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation and 8 mg dexamethasone and 20 mg furosemide were given to the patient taken to intensive care unit. Following the treatments, both symptomatic and radiological improvement was seen (Figure 1).
Figure 1

A 25-year-old man with NPPE. In computed tomography alveolar consolidations which were denser in the central interstitial area of both lungs are seen (A). Following the treatment, decreased consolidations are seen (B).

A 25-year-old man with NPPE. In computed tomography alveolar consolidations which were denser in the central interstitial area of both lungs are seen (A). Following the treatment, decreased consolidations are seen (B).

Case 2

A 28-year-old, obese (BMI: 35,6), ASA score II man was admitted to hospital due to cholelithiasis and operated. Preoperatively, his chest examination results were normal, and a chest radiogram indicated clear lung fields. The patient was ventilated with a 500 ml tidal volume in order to maintain 15 respirations per minute in a volume control mode. The operation lasted for about 90 minutes. In the operation, 1200 mL crystalloid (0.9% NaCl) infusion was made. The procedure was concluded without any complications. Following extubation, severe agitation, bronchospasm and inspiratory effort developed in the patient. In recovery room, negative pressure pulmonary edema was suspected due to auscultation of common rales in both lungs and with 2-4 L/min oxygen saturation values of 91% at postoperative tenth minutes. In the first blood gas sample pH: 7.31, pO2: 52 mmHg, pCO2: 31 mmHg, HCO3: 19 mmol/L Lactate: 1.5 mmol/L in recovery room. Together with oxygen support, non-contrast computed tomography was obtained. There were ground-glass opacifications and alveolar consolidations which were denser in the central interstitial area of both lungs (Figure 2). The patient was given oxygen and taken to intensive care unit for postoperative follow-up. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation and 8mg dexamethasone and 20 mg furosemide treatments were given to the patient taken to the intensive care unit. Following the treatments, both symptomatic and radiological improvement was seen. The patient did not need intubation and we applied NIMV for positive pressure ventilation strategy. The patient was discharged from the intensive care unit after two days of intermittent NIMV application.
Figure 2

A 28-year-old man with NPPE. Alveolar consolidations are prominent in the central interstitial area of both lungs.

A 28-year-old man with NPPE. Alveolar consolidations are prominent in the central interstitial area of both lungs.

Discussion

Although NPPE is a rare complication with a rate of 0.094% in general anesthesia protocol, this rate increases over 11% in patients with postoperative acute upper airway obstruction. In its pathogenesis, it has been reported that intense inspiratory effort against an obstructed airway leads to pulmonary edema (Figure 3)[. The range of normal inspiratory pleural pressure varies between (-2) -(-5) cmH2O; however, inspiratory pleural negative pressure may increase up to about 100 cm-H2O during the difficult inspiratory effort against obstruction[. Venous return to right heart increases, left ventricular output decreases, right ventricular dilatation, shifting to the left in the interventricular septum and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction develop owing to the increased pressure. It has been reported that, in this case, microvascular circulation fails, capillary insufficiency develops, alveolar fluid flow increases, and, eventually pulmonary edema develops[. Adrenergic discharge, depending on anxiety with hypoxia, makes the case even worse[. In its etiology, croup, epiglottitis, previous oropharyngeal surgery, short neck, obesity, foreign materials, tumors, non-viscous tracheal secretions are also taken into consideration.
Figure 3

Intense inspiratory effort against an obstructed airway causes pulmonary edema.

Intense inspiratory effort against an obstructed airway causes pulmonary edema. However, the most frequently known cause of NPPE in adults is laryngospasm after extubation[. It has been reported that NPPE is more common in healthy young adults who have well-developed inspiratory muscles and can generate this pressure easily[. We think that our cases were also healthy young patients, post-extubation laryngospasm and hypoxia contributed to this situation. Cascade et al.[4] reported that NPPE has to be suspected postoperatively in young patients with bilateral central pulmonary edema, increased vascularity, and normal cardiothoracic ratio. For these patients, it is important to make a proper differential diagnosis among massive fluid transfusion, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, anaphylaxis, neurogenic pulmonary edema, and acute respiratory distress syndrome in terms of treatment choice[. There was no history of allergy in our patients. Postoperative cardiovascular system examinations were normal. Since posterior anterior (PA) chest X-ray revealed bilateral central interstitial infiltrations and normal cardiothoracic ratio, there were alveolar type consolidations in upper lobes of bilateral lung parenchyma, lack of massive liquid transfusion during surgery and a rapid recovery pattern with corticosteroid treatment confirmed the diagnosis of NPLE. The treatment is the breakage of the vicious cycle by correcting of hypoxia[. Proper diagnosis provides the choice of appropriate treatment and rapid recovery. In conclusion, NPPE is a rare complication of general anesthesia affecting young adults. In patients with sudden onset of respiratory distress in the postoperative period, alveolar consolidations, which are more prominent in the upper lobes of both lungs, should suggest the diagnosis of NPPE in order to select the appropriate treatment.
  14 in total

1.  Case scenario: acute postoperative negative pressure pulmonary edema.

Authors:  David J Krodel; Edward A Bittner; Raja Abdulnour; Robert Brown; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Negative pressure pulmonary edema after acute upper airway obstruction.

Authors:  K Deepika; C A Kenaan; A M Barrocas; J J Fonseca; G B Bikazi
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.452

Review 3.  Negative-pressure pulmonary edema after routine septorhinoplasty: discussion of pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Richard Westreich; Ian Sampson; Christopher M Shaari; William Lawson
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Immersion, near-drowning and drowning.

Authors:  F S Golden; M J Tipton; R C Scott
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 5.  Drowning, near-drowning, and ice-water submersions.

Authors:  J P Orlowski
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.278

Review 6.  Clinical and radiologic features of pulmonary edema.

Authors:  T Gluecker; P Capasso; P Schnyder; F Gudinchet; M D Schaller; J P Revelly; R Chiolero; P Vock; S Wicky
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  Pulmonary edema due to upper airway obstruction in adults.

Authors:  D Willms; D Shure
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  A case of negative-pressure pulmonary edema after electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Christopher L Myers; Ajay Gopalka; David Glick; Morris B Goldman; Stephen H Dinwiddie
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.635

9.  Acute pulmonary edema associated with obstruction of the airways. Case report.

Authors:  Flora Margarida Barra Bisinotto; Ricardo de Paula Cardoso; Tânia Mara Vilela Abud
Journal:  Rev Bras Anestesiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.964

10.  Pulmonary edema and acute upper airway obstruction.

Authors:  T A Tami; F Chu; T O Wildes; M Kaplan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.