| Literature DB >> 32733660 |
Fahmi Fahmi1, Fitri Apriyulida1, Irina Kemala Nasution2.
Abstract
Patients in the intensive care unit require fast and efficient handling, including in-diagnosis service. The objectives of this study are to produce a computer-aided system so that it can help radiologists to classify the types of brain tumors suffered by patients quickly and accurately; to build applications that can determine the location of brain tumors from CT scan images; and to get the results of the analysis of the system design. The combination of the zoning algorithm with Learning Vector Quantization can increase the speed of computing and can classify normal and abnormal brains with an average accuracy of 85%.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32733660 PMCID: PMC7378674 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2483285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Brain tumor on CT-scan [12].
Figure 2Normal brain on CT-scan.
Figure 3Zoning method.
Figure 4LVQ network architecture [15].
Figure 5Research flowchart.
Figure 6Binarization, normal (a) and after binarization (b).
Figure 7Feature extraction process.
Figure 8Result of image zoning.
Figure 9Value of feature extraction with zoning.
Contingency table.
| P | N | |
|---|---|---|
| Y | TP (True Positive) | FP (False Positive) |
| N | FN (False Negative) | TN (True Negative) |
| Total | P | N |
Figure 10Binary image reconstruction.
Figure 11Training process.
Data set training.
| No. | Brain image | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 0.076161 | Normal |
| 2 |
| 2.304818 | Normal |
| 3 |
| 2.2668598 | Normal |
| 4 |
| 1.456988 | Normal |
| 5 |
| 2.9700592 | Normal |
| 6 |
| 1.6688762 | Normal |
| 7 |
| 1.6688761 | Normal |
| 8 |
| 2.9700592 | Normal |
| 9 |
| 2.769984 | Normal |
| 10 |
| 1.6688762 | Normal |
| 11 |
| 2.9779766 |
|
| 12 |
| 2.9736168 |
|
| 13 |
| 2.9230187 |
|
| 14 |
| 2.800454 |
|
| 15 |
| 3.2186778 |
|
| 16 |
| 1.8768171 |
|
| 17 |
| 2.3506687 |
|
| 18 |
| 1.9752706 |
|
| 19 |
| 3.0961044 |
|
| 20 |
| 2.006145 |
|
Figure 12Image testing process.
Result of testings.
| No. | Image | Weight 1 | Weight 2 | Input∗ | Result | Notes | Pos. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Data-5.png | 3.489579 | 2.9736168 |
|
| TP | Right |
| 2 | Data-9.png | 3.7573445 | 3.2186778 |
|
| TP | Right |
| 3 | Data-2.png | 3.4895792 | 2.9779766 |
|
| TP | Right |
| 4 | Data-12.png | 3.0037804 | 2.6869104 | Normal |
| FN | Normal |
| 5 | Data-13.png | 2.304818 | 2.9392818 | Normal | Normal | TN | Normal |
| 7 | Data-7.png | 3.07729601 | 1.8768171 |
|
| TP | Right |
| 9 | Data-19.png | 2.2668598 | 2.9678066 | Normal | Normal | TN | Normal |
| 10 | Data-11.png | 2.305248 | 2.9393818 | Normal | Normal | TN | Normal |
| 11 | Data-13.png | 2.304818 | 2.93938118 | Normal | Normal | TN | Normal |
| 12 | Data-8.png | 3.4555268 | 2.9230187 |
|
| TP | Left |
| 13 | Data-18.png | 2.9360542 | 2.8076556 | Normal |
| FN | Normal |
| 14 | Data-4.png | 3.5838966 | 2.800454 |
|
| TP | Right |
| 15 | Data-1.png | 3.043977 | 2.006145 |
|
| TP | Right |
| 16 | Data-6.png | 3.0350804 | 2.3506687 |
|
| TP | Left |
| 17 | Data-10.png | 2.3829138 | 3.0961044 |
| Normal | FP | Normal |
| 18 | Data-3.png | 2.8869388 | 1.9752706 |
|
| TP | Right |
| 19 | Data-14.png | 2.769984 | 2.9166098 | Normal | Normal | TN | Normal |
| 20 | Data-15.png | 2.2493293 | 2.9494078 | Normal | Normal | TN | Normal |
LVQ result.
| Classification | LVQ |
|---|---|
| TP | 9 |
| TN | 8 |
| FP | 2 |
| FN | 1 |
| Sensitivity % | 90 |
| Specificity % | 80 |
| Accuracy % | 85 |