| Literature DB >> 32733565 |
Diatri Nari Ratih1, Nikita Ika Sari2, Pribadi Santosa1, Nofa Mardia Ningsih Kaswati3.
Abstract
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six premolars were used in this study and divided by two evaluations: 28 teeth for apical sealing ability and 28 others for bond strength. Each study was assigned randomly into two groups of fourteen teeth: Group-1, final irrigation with 17% EDTA; Group-2, with 0.5% chitosan nanoparticles. Each group was further divided into two groups of 7 each: Group-A, final irrigation was applied for 1 minute; Group-B, for 3 minutes. All teeth were obturated with epoxy resin-based sealer and gutta-percha. In the apical sealing ability study, the obturated teeth were immersed in 2% methylene blue and observed under a stereomicroscope (8x magnification). In the bond strength study, the teeth were tested using the push-out technique and observed under a stereomicroscope (40x magnification) to determine the failure type. Data from each evaluation were analysed with two-way ANOVA followed by the LSD test.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32733565 PMCID: PMC7378618 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8887593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Figure 1Methylene blue penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope with 8x magnification. The penetration of the methylene blue solution was observed in the apical region.
Mean and standard deviation of the sealing ability of root canal obturation (in mm).
| Final irrigation | Application time | Mean ± standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| 17% EDTA | 1 | 5.17 ± 1.35a |
| 3 | 2.06 ± 0.43b | |
|
| ||
| 0.5% chitosan nanoparticle | 1 | 4.88 ± 1.62a |
| 3 | 1.97 ± 0.61b | |
Different letters indicate that there were statistically significant differences.
Mean and standard deviation of the pushout bond strength of the root canal obturation (in MPa).
| Final irrigation | Application time | Mean ± standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| 17% EDTA | 1 | 6.24 ± 1.66a |
| 3 | 9.37 ± 1.06b | |
|
| ||
| 0.5% chitosan nanoparticle | 1 | 7.89 ± 2.02a |
| 3 | 10.19 ± 1.57b | |
Different letters indicate that there were statistically significant differences.
Figure 2The stereomicroscope examination with a magnification of 8x of representative specimens revealed adhesive failure, which showed that the root canal wall had no attached sealer (a); cohesive failure, which exhibited that almost the entire root canal wall was still covered with sealer (b); and mixed failure (mixed between adhesive and cohesive failure), which revealed that some parts of the root canal wall were covered with sealer (c).
Percentage of failure modes following the pushout bond strength test between obturation material and root canal dentin.
| Final irrigation | Application time (min) | Adhesive (%) | Cohesive (%) | Mixed (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17% EDTA | 1 | 42.86 | 42.86 | 14.28 |
| 3 | 28.57 | 71.43 | 0 | |
|
| ||||
| 0.5% chitosan nanoparticle | 1 | 14.28 | 42.86 | 42.86 |
| 3 | 0 | 85.72 | 14.28 | |
|
| ||||
| Total | 17.86 | 60.71 | 21.43 | |