| Literature DB >> 32733450 |
Alessandra Tammaro1, Jesper Kers1,2,3, Angelique M L Scantlebery1, Sandrine Florquin1,2.
Abstract
Renal ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI), a common event after renal transplantation, causes acute kidney injury (AKI), increases the risk of delayed graft function (DGF), primes the donor kidney for rejection, and contributes to the long-term risk of graft loss. In the last decade, epidemiological studies have linked even mild episodes of AKI to chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, and innate immunity seems to play a crucial role. The ischemic insult triggers an acute inflammatory reaction that is elicited by Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs), expressed on both infiltrating immune cells as well as tubular epithelial cells (TECs). Among the PRRs, Toll-like receptors (TLRs), their synergistic receptors, Nod-like receptors (NLRs), and the inflammasomes, play a pivotal role in shaping inflammation and TEC repair, in response to renal IRI. These receptors represent promising targets to modulate the extent of inflammation, but also function as gatekeepers of tissue repair, protecting against AKI-to-CKD progression. Despite the important considerations on timely use of therapeutics, in the context of IRI, treatment options are limited by a lack of understanding of the intra- and intercellular mechanisms associated with the activation of innate immune receptors and their impact on adaptive tubular repair. Accumulating evidence suggests that TEC-associated innate immunity shapes the tubular response to stress through the regulation of immunometabolism. Engagement of innate immune receptors provides TECs with the metabolic flexibility necessary for their plasticity during injury and repair. This could significantly affect pathogenic processes within TECs, such as cell death, mitochondrial damage, senescence, and pro-fibrotic cytokine secretion, well-known to exacerbate inflammation and fibrosis. This article provides an overview of the past 5 years of research on the role of innate immunity in experimental and human IRI, with a focus on the cascade of events activated by hypoxic damage in TECs: from programmed cell death (PCD) and mitochondrial dysfunction-mediated metabolic rewiring of TECs to maladaptive repair and progression to fibrosis. Finally, we will discuss the important crosstalk between metabolism and innate immunity observed in TECs and their therapeutic potential in both experimental and clinical research.Entities:
Keywords: cell death; innate immunity; kidney transplantation; mitochondria; senescence; tubular repair
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32733450 PMCID: PMC7358591 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Mitochondria-targeted approaches in renal IRI.
| Unilateral IR, 30 min clamping | Rat | Fasting promotes mitochondrial biogenesis through the AMPK pathway | Decrease kidney damage, oxidative stress, and ameliorates mitochondrial function and has long-term beneficial effects ( | |
| Bilateral IR, 45 min clamping | mouse | Mitochondria- targeted antioxidants | Decreases oxidative damage and improves renal function ( | |
| Unilateral IR, 40 min clamping | Rat | Mitochondria- targeted antioxidants | Decreases oxidative damage and improves renal function ( | |
| Bilateral IR, 30–45 min clamping | rat | Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants | Decreases mitochondrial swelling, improves mitochondrial pathology and protect cristae membranes. Protects rats from kidney dysfunction, inflammation, and fibrosis ( | |
| Unilateral IR, 15 min clamping | rat | Bolus injection of | Amino acid with an important role in metabolic regulation and anti-oxidative reactions. | Improved renal function, decreased tubular injury, and oxidative stress. Prevents initial damage and chronic hypoxia ( |
| Unilateral IR, 60 min clamping | Rat | Antioxidant | Decreased renal dysfunction, oxidative stress and inflammation. Ameliorated renal histologic damage ( |
Figure 1Phenotypic changes described in TECs following IRI associated with maladaptive tubular repair and progressive renal interstitial fibrosis. These changes include but are not limited to: cell damage (chronic inflammation with persistent cytokine production and immune cell infiltrate), mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death (enhanced ROS signaling, metabolic reprogramming, and release of mitochondrial DNA/ROS acting as danger molecules, ultimately leading to cell death). Lastly, as a result of incomplete repair or severe damage, TECs can undergo transient cell cycle arrest, as a protective mechanism to ensure genome stability. However, if persistent, this leads to a pro-inflammatory and profibrotic secretome, ultimately leading to fibrosis.
Figure 2The tubular epithelial response to IR: a simplified overview of the main mechanisms driving (mal)adaptive repair leading to kidney fibrosis. Key mechanisms include: epithelial innate immune response, cell death, mitochondrial dysfunction, metabolic reprogramming, and cell cycle arrest/cellular senescence.
Figure 3The innate immune response in renal IR: the fine balance between adaptive repair and chronic degeneration. In this figure we describe the 2 possible scenarios that may occur in the kidney following AKI. The fist scenario involves a moderate injury resolved by a balanced and timely activation of the innate immune response, most likely associated with a low and transient senescence burden, resulting in adaptive tubular repair and kidney regeneration. In the second scenario we envision that either a low-grade chronic inflammation (possibly related to an aging phenotype and the associated high senescent burden) or a constant PRRs blockade (to avoid excessive inflammation), contribute to phenotypic changes in TECs (as described in Figure 1) and maladaptive tubular repair.