| Literature DB >> 32733374 |
Lutgarda Bozzetto1, Giuseppe Della Pepa1, Claudia Vetrani1, Angela Albarosa Rivellese1.
Abstract
Abnormalities in postprandial lipemia (PPL), particularly those related to triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, are considered an independent cardiovascular risk factor. As diet is known to be one of the main modulators of PPL, the aim of this review was to summarize and discuss current knowledge on the impact of diet and its components on PPL in humans; specifically, the impact of weight loss, different nutrients (quantity and quality of dietary fats, carbohydrates, and proteins), alcohol and other bioactive dietary components (i.e., polyphenols), as well as the effect of different dietary patterns. The possible mechanisms behind the metabolic effects of each dietary component were also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: diet; dietary components; dietary patterns; postprandial lipemia; triglyceride concentrations; triglyceride-rich lipoprotein
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32733374 PMCID: PMC7358426 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00337
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Possible dietary impact on metabolic pathways regulating postprandial lipemia.
| Caloric restriction and weight loss | ↓ | ↑High LPL activity | ↓ Less substrate for TG synthesis |
| Total fat | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
| MUFA | ↑ Early ↓ Late | ↑High LPL activity and/or Low Apo CIII | ↓ |
| PUFA | ↓ | – | ↓ Highly oxidized in the liver |
| SFA | – | – | ↑ |
| Fructose | ↑ | ↓High Apo CIII | ↑ |
| Fiber | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ |
| Proteins | ↓ | – | – |
| Polyphenols | ↓ | – | ↓ |
| Alcohol | – | ↓ | ↑ |
↓, reduced activity; ↑, enhanced activity; –, no relevant effects; TRLs, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins; TG, triglycerides; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFA, saturated fatty acids; Apo, apolipoprotein.
Short/medium-term controlled studies on the effects of weight loss on postprandial lipemia.
| ( | 40 Obese M/W with atherogenic dyslipidemia | Randomized parallel group | Energy-restricted low-CHO diet (12% CHO, 59% F, 28% P) vs. energy-restricted low-Fat diet (56% CHO, 24% F, 20% P) | 12 weeks | Oral fat tolerance test | ↓ TAG tAUC adjusted for fasting values after the low-CHO diet, |
| ( | 22 Obese M MetS with atherogenic dyslipidemia | Randomized parallel group | Energy-restricted diet vs. maintenance weight diet | 16 weeks | Oral fat tolerance test | = apo B48 tAUC and iAUC |
| ( | 15 Overweight M | Randomized cross-over | Energy-restricted very low-CHO diet (8% CHO, 62% F, 28% P) vs. energy-restricted very low-Fat diet (56% CHO, 24% F, 20% P) | 6 weeks | Oral fat tolerance test | ↓TAG tAUC greater after the very low-CHO diet |
| ( | 13 Overweight W | Randomized cross-over | Energy-restricted very low-CHO diet (9% CHO, 63% F, 28% P) vs. energy-restricted very low-Fat diet (59% CHO, 21% F, 20% P) | 4 weeks | Oral fat tolerance test | ↓TAG tAUC similar after both diets |
| ( | 13 Overweight/Obese M/W | Randomized cross-over | Intermittent energy-restricted diet (38% CHO, 36% F, 26% P) vs. continuous energy-restricted diet (38% CHO, 36% F, 26% P) | 10 weeks | Oral fat tolerance test | ↓TAG iAUC after the intermittent energy-restricted diet |
TEI, total energy intake; PPL, postprandial lipemia; ↓, reduction; =, no changes; M, men; W, women; CHO, carbohydrates; F, fats; P, proteins; TAG, triglycerides; tAUC, total area under the curve; MetS, metabolic syndrome; iAUC, incremental area under the curve.
Isoenergetic short/medium-term studies on the effects of dietary carbohydrate quality and quantity, and of dietary fat amount on postprandial lipemia.
| ( | 10 Healthy W | Randomized cross-over | Low-CHO | 10 | 3 | 12 | 60 | 4 weeks | Oral fat tolerance test | High-CHO equal to low-CHO |
| High-CHO | 55 | 25 | 20 | 25 | ||||||
| ( | 10 T2D M | Randomized cross-over | High-MUFA | 40 | 17 | 26 | 45 | 6 weeks | Oral fat tolerance test | High-CHO equal to low-CHO |
| High-CHO | 55 | 23 | 36 | 30 | ||||||
| ( | 88 M/W dyslipidaemia and/or IR | Cross-over | Low-MUFA | 49 | 18 | 22 | 37 | 7 weeks | High-fat test meal | Low-MUFA equal to high-MUFA equal to high-CHO |
| High-MUFA | 49 | 18 | 22 | 36 | ||||||
| High-CHO | 54 | 19 | 34 | 30 | ||||||
| ( | 12 T2D | Randomized cross-over | High-MUFA | 45 | n.r. | 25 | 40 | 6 weeks | High-fat test meal | High-MUFA equal to high-CHO |
| High-CHO | 55 | n.r. | 25 | 30 | ||||||
| ( | 8 post-obese 10 healthy W | Randomized cross-over | Low-CHO | 41 | 2 | 32 | 46 | 2 weeks | Breakfast, lunch and dinner with the same composition of the followed diet | Low-CHO greater than high-sugar and high-starch |
| High-starch | 59 | 2 | 22 | 28 | ||||||
| High- sugar | 59 | 23 | 20 | 18 | ||||||
| ( | 18 T2D | Randomized cross-over | High-MUFA | 45 | 10 | 16 | 37 | 4 weeks | Test-meal with the same composition of the followed diet | High-MUFA greater than high-fiber |
| High-fiber | 52 | 10 | 54 | 30 | ||||||
| ( | 45 T2D | Randomized parallel groups | High-MUFA | 40 | 10 | 16 | 42 | 8 weeks | Test-meal with the same composition of the followed diet | High-MUFA greater than high-fiber |
| High-fiber | 53 | 10 | 52 | 28 | ||||||
| ( | 65 M/W MetS | Randomized parallel groups | Whole-grain | 51 | n.r. | 20 | 32 | 12 weeks | Test-meal with the same composition of the followed diet | Refined-grain greater than whole-grain |
| Refined-grain | 50 | n.r. | 40 | 33 | ||||||
CHO, carbohydrates; TEI, total energy intake; TAG, triglyceride; W, women; T2D, type 2 diabetes; M, men; IR, Insulin Resistance; n.r., not reported; MetS, Metabolic Syndrome.
Isoenergetic short/medium-term studies on the effects of fat quality on postprandial lipemia.
| ( | 12 T2D | Randomized cross-over | High-SFA | 46 | 37 | 17 | 15 | 3 weeks | Standard High-Fat Test-meal | Early chylomicron TAG: high | |
| High-MUFA | 46 | 37 | 8 | 23 | |||||||
| ( | 162 healthy | Randomized parallel groups | High-SFA | 44 | 37 | 18 | 13 | 4.7 | 12 weeks | Standard high-fat test-meal | Plasma TAG |
| High-MUFA | 46 | 37 | 10 | 21 | 4.6 | ||||||
| ( | 23 healthy | Randomized cross-over | High-SFA | 43 | 41 | 17 | 14 | 7.0 | 8 weeks | Standard high-fat test-meal | Early plasma TAG: high -MUFA greater than high -SFA |
| High-MUFA | 44 | 41 | 12 | 18 | 7.2 | ||||||
| ( | 20 M | Randomized cross-over | High-SFA | 47 | 38 | 22 | 24 | 4 | 4 weeks | High-fat meal with the same composition of the followed diet | TRL particles number: high -MUFA lower than high -SFA |
| High -MUFA | 47 | 38 | <10 | 24 | 4 | ||||||
| High -PUFA | 55 | <30 | <10 | 12 | 8 | ||||||
| ( | 32 M | Randomized parallel groups | High -SFA | 49 | 37 | 17 | 12 | 4 | 29 days | High-fat meal with the same composition of the followed diet | TAG ApoB48 iAUC: high-PUFA greater than high -SFA |
| High -PUFA | 45 | 40 | 10 | 14 | 13 | ||||||
| ( | 8 healthy | Randomized cross-over | High-SFA | 43 | 42 | 28 | 12 | 2.1 | 25 days | Vitamin A fat-loading test | RP chylomicron high -PUFA lower than high -SFA |
| High-PUFA n-6 | 43 | 42 | 13 | 13 | 18 | ||||||
CHO, carbohydrates; TEI, total energy intake; SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; PPL, postprandial lipemia; T2D, type 2 diabetes; n. a., not available; TAG, triglyceride; M, men; TRL, Triglyceride Rich Lipoproteins; iAUC, incremental area under the curve; RP, Retinil Palmitate.
no differences in fasting TAG levels.
Short/medium-term controlled studies on the effects of protein, polyphenol, alcohol, and dietary patterns on postprandial lipemia.
| ( | 20 M/W with moderate hyperTAG | Randomized parallel group | Isocaloric low protein diet (14%P, 53%C30% F) vs. isocaloric high protein diet (25%P, 35%C, 30%F) | 6 weeks | Oral fat tolerance test | = iAUC TAG↓ iAUC ApoB48 after high protein diet |
| ( | 52 overweight M/W | Randomized 2 × 2 factorial design | Isocaloric diet vs. isocaloric diet + 60 g whey protein | 12 weeks | High Fat test meal | = plasma TAG response |
| ( | 78 overweight M/W MetS | Randomized parallel group | Low-polyphenol isocaloric diet (~350 mg/day) vs. high-polyphenol isocaloric diet (~3,000 mg/day) | 8 weeks | High Fat test meal | ↓ tAUC plasma TAG |
| ( | 12 healthy W | Randomized cross-over | Red wine (30 g/day of alcohol) vs. red grape | 3 weeks | High fat dinner | ↑TAG tAUC in the red wine group |
| ( | 12 healthy M | Randomized cross-over | red wine or beer or spirits (40 g/day of alcohol) vs. mineral water | 3 weeks | High fat dinner | ↑TAG tAUC after the red wine, beer and spirits |
| ( | 20 healthy M | Randomized | Western diet (47% CHO, 15% P, 38% F) vs. Mediterranean diet (47% CHO, 15% P, 38% F) vs. high CHO enriched with ALA diet (55% CHO, 15% P, <30% F) | 4 weeks | High fat breakfast | ↓ TRL tAUC after the Mediterranean diet* |
| ( | 135 overweight/ Obese M/W | Randomized parallel group | Mediterranean diet (50% CHO, 12–15% P, 35–38% F) vs. AHA low-Fat diet (55–60% CHO, 15% P, <30% F) | 3 months | Oral fat tolerance test | ↓ ApoB48 iAUC greater after the Mediterranean diet |
| ( | 241 without T2D 316 T2D M/W | Randomized parallel group | Mediterranean diet (50% CHO, 15% P, 35% F) vs. low-Fat diet (55% CHO, 15% P, <30% F) | 3 years | Oral fat tolerance test | ↓ cholesterol in remnant TRL after the Mediterranean diet in T2D |
TEI, total energy intake; PPL, postprandial lipemia; M, men; W, women; CHO, carbohydrates; F, fats; P, proteins; =, no changes; iAUC, incremental area under the curve; ↓, reduction; ↑, increase; TAG, triglycerides; tAUC, total area under the curve; MetS, metabolic syndrome; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein; AHA, American Heart Association; ALA, α-linolenic acid; TRL, triglycerides rich lipoproteins; T2D, type 2 diabetes. *no differences in fasting TAG levels.
Summary table of the dietary impact on postprandial lipemia.
| Weight-loss diet | ↓ |
| Carbohydrates: | |
| - Simple sugars | ↑ (fructose more than glucose) |
| - Dietary fiber | ↓↓ |
| - Diet moderately rich in carbohydrate | ↓↓ |
| Fats: | |
| - Amount | ↑ (acute studies) |
| - Quality | -/↓ MUFA vs. SFA ↓ PUFA-n6 vs. SFA |
| Proteins | ↓ (mainly acute studies supplements) |
| Polyphenols | ↓ (mainly acute studies) |
| Alcohol | ↑ (mainly acute studies) |
| Dietary patterns | ↓ (Mediterranean diet) |
↑, increase; ↓, reduction; ↓↓, strong reduction; -, no change; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFA, saturated fatty acid.