| Literature DB >> 32733256 |
Yonglin Zhou1,2, Xiaohong Lv1, Meishan Chen2, Yan Guo2, Rui Ding2, Bin Liu3, Xuming Deng1,2, Jianfeng Wang1,2.
Abstract
The emergence of KPC-producing Gram-negative bacteria in clinical practice highlights the need to search for novel antimicrobials and new anti-infection strategies. In this study, we constructed a laboratory KPC-2-positive strain, E. coli BL21(DE3) (pET28a-KPC-2) and identified the activity of KPC-2 in this strain. Using enzyme inhibition assays, checkerboard MIC assays, growth curves, time-killing assays and combined disk test, we found that the natural compound corosolic acid (CA) significantly inhibited the activity of the class A β-lactamase KPC-2, which is common among clinical isolates. CA treatment increased the antibacterial or bactericidal activity of imipenem and meropenem against E. coli BL21(DE3) (pET28a-KPC-2) in vitro (FIC index = 0.17 ± 0.03 for both carbapenems). In addition, the mouse intraperitoneal infection model confirmed that the combination therapy significantly reduced the bacterial load in the livers and spleens following subcutaneous administration. Our results showed that CA can be used to extend the life of carbapenems, providing a viable strategy for severe infections caused by KPC-2-positive bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: Enterobacteriaceae; KPC-2; anti-infection; carbapenems; corosolic acid
Year: 2020 PMID: 32733256 PMCID: PMC7363806 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1Identification of the activity of KPC-2 in constructed bacterial strains. The strains E. coli BL21 (pET28a-KPC-2) and E. coli BL21 (pET28a) were used for the Carba NP test. The results were evaluated by the color changes (A) and absorbance (B) at 600 nm. Solution A supplemented with imipenem (12.0 mg/ml) was used as test solution B. *indicates P < 0.05.
Figure 2CA inhibited the activity of KPC-2. The structure of CA (A). A significant inhibitory effect of CA on the activities of KPC-2 was detected by enzyme inhibition assays following co-culture (B) or co-incubation (C) with the indicated concentrations of CA (0–32 µg/ml). In addition, the activities of purified KPC-2 protein were also inhibited by CA in a concentration-dependent manner (E). The color of the test solution gradually turned yellow as the concentration of CA increased, and CA itself did not cause color changes (D). **indicates P < 0.01; *indicates P < 0.05.
Figure 3Checkerboard MIC analysis showed a synergistic effect of CA combined with IMP (A) or MEP (B) against the carbapenemase-positive laboratory strain E. coli BL21 (pET28a-KPC-2). Growth curves for E. coli BL21(DE3) (pET28a-KPC-2) (C). Time-killing curves for the CA, IMP, CA and IMP in combination and control treatments (medium only) against E. coli BL21(DE3) (pET28a-KPC-2) (D).
MIC values of the carbapenems and CA combination therapy for each of the tested bacterial isolates.
| Species | Antibiotics | MIC of Antibiotics (μg/mL) | FIC Index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alone | Combination | |||
|
| Meropenem | 14.00 ± 4.00 | 1.5 ± 0.58 |
|
| Imipenem | 1.50 ± 0.58 | 0.16 ± 0.06 |
| |
|
| Meropenem | 0.008 ± 0.00 | 0.008 ± 0.00 | 1.06 ± 0.00 |
| Imipenem | 0.094 ± 0.04 | 0.078 ± 0.031 | 0.94 ± 0.25 | |
The concentration of CA was 32 μg/ml in E. coli BL21(DE3) (pET28a-KPC-2) and E. coli BL21(DE3) (pET28a). The FIC values of KPC-2-positive bacterial isolates were indicated in bold. The data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 4Zones of inhibition surrounding MEP disks on LB agar plates with different concentrations of CA (0, 8 and 32 µg/ml) (A). The results of the combined disk test showed increases in the zones of inhibition surrounding MEP disks in a dose-dependent manner only for E. coli BL21(DE3) (pET28a-KPC-2) with different concentrations of CA (B). **indicates P <0.01; *indicates P < 0.05; ns indicates no significant difference.
Figure 5Confirmation of the synergistic effect of CA in combination with IMP in vivo. The mice were intraperitoneally administered E. coli BL21(DE3) (pET28a-KPC-2), and the bacterial burden of the livers (A) and spleens (B) was calculated. **indicates P < 0.01; *indicates P < 0.05; ns indicates no significant difference.