Literature DB >> 32733055

DNA-based delivery of anti-DR5 Nanobodies improves exposure and anti-tumor efficacy over protein-based administration.

Giles Vermeire1, Elien De Smidt1,2, Peter Casteels3, Nick Geukens2, Paul Declerck4,5, Kevin Hollevoet6,7.   

Abstract

Nanobodies present an appealing class of potential cancer therapeutics. The current study explores the in vivo expression of these molecules through DNA-encoded delivery. We hypothesized that this approach could address the rapid clearance of Nanobodies and, through half-life modulation, increase the produced levels in circulation. We therefore evaluated pharmacokinetics and efficacy of variants of an anti-death receptor 5 Nanobody (NbDR5), either monovalent or multivalent with half-life extension properties, after DNA-based administration. Intramuscular electrotransfer of a monovalent NbDR5-encoding plasmid (pNbDR5) did not result in detectable plasma levels in BALB/c mice. A tetravalent NbDR5-encoding plasmid (pNbDR54) provided peak concentrations of 54 ng/mL, which remained above 24 ng/mL during a 12-week follow-up. DNA-based delivery of these Nanobody formats fused to a Nanobody binding to serum albumin (NbSA), pNbDR5-NbSA and pNbDR54-NbSA, resulted in significantly higher plasma levels, with peak titers of 5.2 and 7.7 µg/mL, respectively. In an athymic-nude mice COLO 205 colon-cancer model, a quadrupled intramuscular DNA dose led to peak plasma levels of 270 ng/mL for pNbDR54 and 38 µg/mL for pNbDR54-NbSA. Potent anti-tumor responses were only observed for pNbDR54, following either intramuscular or intratumoral delivery. Despite comparable in vitro activity and superior plasma exposure, NbDR54-NbSA was less effective than NbDR54 in vivo, regardless of whether delivered as DNA or protein. Overall, DNA-based Nanobody delivery resulted in more potent and durable anti-tumor responses than protein-based Nanobody delivery. In conclusion, this study demonstrates pre-clinical proof of concept for DNA-based Nanobodies in oncology and highlights the improved outcome over conventional protein administration.
© 2020. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32733055     DOI: 10.1038/s41417-020-0204-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther        ISSN: 0929-1903            Impact factor:   5.987


  1 in total

1.  Low-dose combinations of LBH589 and TRAIL can overcome TRAIL-resistance in colon cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Sang-Cheol Lee; Hee-Jeong Cheong; Sook-Ja Kim; Jina Yoon; Han Jo Kim; Kyoung Ha Kim; Se Hyoung Kim; Hyun Jung Kim; Sang Byung Bae; Chan-Kyu Kim; Namsu Lee; Kyu Taeg Lee; Sung Kyu Park; Dae Sik Hong; Hee Sook Park; Jong-Ho Won
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.480

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Intratumoral DNA-based delivery of checkpoint-inhibiting antibodies and interleukin 12 triggers T cell infiltration and anti-tumor response.

Authors:  Kevin Hollevoet; Paul Declerck; Liesl Jacobs; Lidia Yshii; Steffie Junius; Nick Geukens; Adrian Liston
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 5.854

2.  Clinically relevant dosing and pharmacokinetics of DNA-encoded antibody therapeutics in a sheep model.

Authors:  Kevin Hollevoet; Debby Thomas; Griet Compernolle; Giles Vermeire; Elien De Smidt; Stéphanie De Vleeschauwer; Trevor R F Smith; Paul D Fisher; Maarten Dewilde; Nick Geukens; Paul Declerck
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Electroporation outperforms in vivo-jetPEI for intratumoral DNA-based reporter gene transfer.

Authors:  Liesl Jacobs; Elien De Smidt; Nick Geukens; Paul Declerck; Kevin Hollevoet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.