| Literature DB >> 32732979 |
E M Chávez-Solís1,2, C Solís3, N Simões2,4,5, M Mascaró6,7.
Abstract
Cave shrimps of the Typhlatya genus are cEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32732979 PMCID: PMC7393362 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69562-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Vertical profile of physical and chemical hydrological parameters of Ponderosa Nohmozon and Tza Itza Systems. Data obtained using a Hydrolab DataSonde5.
Figure 2Typhlatya hydro region distribution in Yucatan underground submerged systems. (A) Amount of observed individuals per transect of 20 m3 at the cenote pool, cavern and cave hydro regions of Nohmozon, Tza Itza and Ponderosa systems. The boxplots indicate the first and third quartile of the data, the black line indicates the median and the whiskers extend to the most extreme data which is no further than 2 standard deviations. (B) Visualization of species distribution in a theoretical continuous underground system, showing the freshwater cenotes farther from the coast and the saline intrusion being shallower as closer to the coast. Artwork by Alberto Guerra.
Permutational Multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) results on distribution data of Typhlatya species within underground systems of Yucatan.
| Source | df | SS | MS | Pseudo-F | Unique permutations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System (Sy) | 2 | 99,424 | 49,712 | 96.7 | 0.0001*** | 9,944 |
| Hydro region (Hr) | 2 | 21,191 | 10,596 | 20.6 | 0.0001*** | 9,944 |
| Season (Se) | 2 | 2,110 | 1,055 | 2.2 | 0.0822 | 9,959 |
| Sy × Hr | 4 | 89,856 | 22,464 | 43.8 | 0.0001*** | 9,933 |
| Sy × Se | 4 | 2,519 | 630 | 1.4 | 0.2359 | 9,947 |
| Hr × Se | 4 | 1858 | 464 | 1.0 | 0.4174 | 9,959 |
| Sy × Hr × Se | 8 | 1723 | 215 | 0.5 | 0.8665 | 9,946 |
| Obs (Sy × Hr × Se) | 38 | 15,310 | 403 | 1.7 | 0.0037*** | 9,857 |
| Residuals | 169 | 40,086 | 237 | |||
| Total | 233 | 274,000 |
Sources are: System (Sy), Hydro region (Hr), Season (Se) and Observer (Obs). Asterisks refer to the probability of that p value.
***p < 0.001.
Pair-wise t-tests for system and hydro region terms with each factor level.
| Cenote pool | Cavern | |
| 15.1*** | ||
| 13.8*** | 2.9* | |
| 2.4** | ||
| 6.7*** | 2.6** | |
| 3.0* | ||
| 10.5*** | 7.6*** | |
t-values contrasting each hydro region within the same cenote are provided. Symbols refer to the probability of t-values.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Carbon isotopic analysis indicating the Δ14C and δ13C bulk composition of T. mitchelli (sampled in Tza Itza), T. pearsei (sampled in Nohmozon) and T. dzilamensis (sampled in Ponderosa), and DIC contained in fresh groundwater (FGW) and saline groundwater (SGW), accordingly. δ13C values of potential carbon sources are indicated as ranges (source data from[8,11,16,17]). Artwork by Alberto Guerra.
Two mixing model scenarios considering accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) δ13C and Δ14C of modern organic matter (OM), modern methane (MM) and ancient methane (AM) as endmember potential sources that contribute to Typhlatya diet affecting their tissue composition.
| Scenario | 1 | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| δ13C (‰) | Δ14C (‰) | Δ14C (‰) | |
| OM | − 25.4 | − 4.3 | − 4.3 |
| MM | − 66.3 | 0 | 0 |
| AM | − 56.3 | − 1,000 | − 260 |
δ13C remains constant in all scenarios, whilst AM was assigned as 14C-carbon dead in the first scenario and the oldest Δ14C obtained in this study for the second scenario.
Figure 4Relative contribution to the carbon in Typhlatya species as an average percentage of their carbon uptake in two mixing model scenarios, considering the Δ14C and δ13C of three potential feeding sources: organic matter (OM), modern methane (MM) and ancient methane (AM). Scenario 1 considered AM as 14C-dead carbon (Δ14CAM2 = − 1,000‰); scenario 2 considered AM as Δ14C = − 260‰ corresponding to the DIC measured in the saline layer of Ponderosa cave.
Figure 5Distribution patterns of T. mitchelli through a depth gradient in day and night observations at Kankirixche and Tza Itza. Transect depth is shown in meters and relative to increasing transect number; transect 1 (under cenote pool) to 5 (end of cavern closest to cave). A light perception bar is drawn to represent the approximate depth at which light reaches in either cavern. At each transect abundance was registered during day and night in each system. The boxplots indicate the first and third quartile of the data, the black line shows the median and the whiskers extend to the most extreme data which is no further than 2 standard deviations, data beyond whiskers is shown as black dots. Artwork by Alberto Guerra.
Figure 6Depth distribution patterns of T. mitchelli throughout the year in Tza Itza and Kankirixche. Transect depth is shown as relative to each other and not as actual depth: transects 1 were at the cenote pool, transects 2–5 were distributed in an increasing depth gradient throughout the caverns of Tza Itza and Kankirixche systems. Boxplots indicate the first and third quartile of the data, the black line is the median and the whiskers extend to the most extreme data which is no further than 2 standard deviations, black dots represent counts which were beyond 2 standard deviations. Artwork by Alberto Guerra.
Figure 7(A) Conceptual model of groundwater hydro regions depicting the general profiles of transects used to monitor Typhlatya abundance and distribution within the systems: cenote pool, cavern and cave. Two transects (yellow lines) were installed in each hydro-region and traversed simultaneously by two divers, twice during each of three seasons (dry, rainy and winter) throughout 1 year. (B) Diver approaching a transect in the cavern of Kankirixche. Artwork by Alberto Guerra.
Figure 8Diagram showing the location of sampling transects installed in Kankirixché and Tza Itza where the number of Typhlatya mitchelli were counted during day (A) and night (B) observations performed by two divers every 2 months throughout 1 year. Artwork by Alberto Guerra.