Christopher J Miller1,2, Kevin N Griffith3,4, Kelly Stolzmann1, Bo Kim1,2, Samantha L Connolly1,2, Mark S Bauer1,2. 1. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School. 3. Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center (PEPReC), VA Boston Healthcare System. 4. Department of Health Law, Policy, & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Collaborative Chronic Care Models represent an evidence-based way to structure care for chronic conditions, including mental health conditions. Few studies, however, have examined the cost implications of collaborative care for mental health. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to conduct an economic analysis of implementing collaborative care in 9 outpatient general mental health clinics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Analyses were derived from a stepped wedge hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. We conducted cost-minimization analyses from the health system perspective, incorporating implementation costs, outpatient costs, and inpatient costs for the year before collaborative care implementation and the implementation year. We used a difference-in-differences approach and conducted 1-way sensitivity analyses to determine the robustness of results to variations ±15% in model parameters, along with probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. SUBJECTS: Our treatment group included 5507 patients who were initially engaged in care within 9 outpatient general mental health teams that underwent collaborative care implementation. We compared costs for this group to 45,981 control patients who received mental health treatment as usual at the same medical centers. RESULTS: Collaborative care implementation cost about $40 per patient and was associated with a significant decrease in inpatient costs and a nonsignificant increase in outpatient mental health costs. This implementation was associated with $78 in cost savings per patient. Monte Carlo simulation suggested that implementation was cost saving in 78% of iterations. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care implementation for mental health teams was associated with significant reductions in mental health hospitalizations, leading to substantial cost savings of about $1.70 for every dollar spent for implementation.
BACKGROUND: Collaborative Chronic Care Models represent an evidence-based way to structure care for chronic conditions, including mental health conditions. Few studies, however, have examined the cost implications of collaborative care for mental health. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to conduct an economic analysis of implementing collaborative care in 9 outpatient general mental health clinics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Analyses were derived from a stepped wedge hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. We conducted cost-minimization analyses from the health system perspective, incorporating implementation costs, outpatient costs, and inpatient costs for the year before collaborative care implementation and the implementation year. We used a difference-in-differences approach and conducted 1-way sensitivity analyses to determine the robustness of results to variations ±15% in model parameters, along with probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. SUBJECTS: Our treatment group included 5507 patients who were initially engaged in care within 9 outpatient general mental health teams that underwent collaborative care implementation. We compared costs for this group to 45,981 control patients who received mental health treatment as usual at the same medical centers. RESULTS: Collaborative care implementation cost about $40 per patient and was associated with a significant decrease in inpatient costs and a nonsignificant increase in outpatient mental health costs. This implementation was associated with $78 in cost savings per patient. Monte Carlo simulation suggested that implementation was cost saving in 78% of iterations. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care implementation for mental health teams was associated with significant reductions in mental health hospitalizations, leading to substantial cost savings of about $1.70 for every dollar spent for implementation.
Authors: Mark S Bauer; Linda McBride; William O Williford; Henry Glick; Bruce Kinosian; Lori Altshuler; Thomas Beresford; Amy M Kilbourne; Martha Sajatovic Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: H P Neumann; B U Bender; W Schultze-Seemann; T Krause; C Altehoefer; R Scheremet; M Orszagh; G Schwarzkopf; A Januszewicz; G Janetschek; P Riegler Journal: Contrib Nephrol Date: 1997 Impact factor: 1.580
Authors: Bo Kim; Christopher J Miller; A Rani Elwy; Sally K Holmes; Craig M Coldwell; Mark S Bauer Journal: J Interprof Care Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 2.338
Authors: Aranzazu Noain; Victoria Garcia-Cardenas; Miguel Angel Gastelurrutia; Amaia Malet-Larrea; Fernando Martinez-Martinez; Daniel Sabater-Hernandez; Shalom I Benrimoj Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2017-04-22
Authors: Calum Davey; James Hargreaves; Jennifer A Thompson; Andrew J Copas; Emma Beard; James J Lewis; Katherine L Fielding Journal: Trials Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Robert A Lew; Christopher J Miller; Bo Kim; Hongsheng Wu; Kelly Stolzmann; Mark S Bauer Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Shawna N Smith; Daniel Almirall; Seo Youn Choi; Elizabeth Koschmann; Amy Rusch; Emily Bilek; Annalise Lane; James L Abelson; Daniel Eisenberg; Joseph A Himle; Kate D Fitzgerald; Celeste Liebrecht; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 7.960