Literature DB >> 32732753

In Reply.

John B Gebhart1, Jennifer J Schmitt2, Mary V Baker1, John A Occhino1, Michaela E McGree3, Amy L Weaver3, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez1, Sean C Dowdy1, Kalyan S Pasupathy4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32732753      PMCID： PMC7409370          DOI： 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN： 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.623


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Why do we argue about route of hysterectomy? A call for dialogue.

Authors:  Andrew J Walter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Achieving high value in the surgical approach to hysterectomy.

Authors:  James L Whiteside; Carson T Kaeser; Beri Ridgeway
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Surgeon volume and outcomes in benign hysterectomy.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Magdy P Milad; Dana R Gossett
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Hysterectomy in Residency Training: The New Numbers Game?

Authors:  Saketh R Guntupalli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Surgical outcomes for low-volume vs high-volume surgeons in gynecology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alex Mowat; Christopher Maher; Emma Ballard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel; Andrea E Siewers; Philip P Goodney; David E Wennberg; F Lee Lucas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.