Literature DB >> 32732673

Bending Versus Transforming the Drug Cost Curve: A Matter of Political Will.

Ajay Major1, Blase N Polite.   

Abstract

There is increasing consensus that comprehensive reforms are needed to curb the rising costs of specialty drugs and growing bipartisan agreement on the basic principles that these reforms must address (1) constraints on yearly inflation of drug prices, (2) limits on practices to extend patents and restrict generic competition, (3) increased transparency of rebates provided by pharmaceutical companies to pharmacy benefit managers and insurance companies, and (4) caps on the total yearly out-of-pocket costs for Medicare patients. While such reforms will improve the current system, they are unlikely to be truly transformative. Transformative change requires that all the relevant stakeholders be forced, by a legislative or administrative mandate, to come to an agreement on value. Whether federal policy makers have the will to do so will determine whether we truly change the trajectory of the currently unsustainable drug cost curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32732673      PMCID: PMC9040521          DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   2.074


  18 in total

1.  Payer and Policy Maker Steps to Support Value-Based Pricing for Drugs.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Pharmacy Benefit Managers, Brand-Name Drug Prices, and Patient Cost Sharing.

Authors:  Ge Bai; Aditi P Sen; Gerard F Anderson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Policy Recommendations for Pharmacy Benefit Managers to Stem the Escalating Costs of Prescription Drugs: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Hilary Daniel; Sue S Bornstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Death or Debt? National Estimates of Financial Toxicity in Persons with Newly-Diagnosed Cancer.

Authors:  Adrienne M Gilligan; David S Alberts; Denise J Roe; Grant H Skrepnek
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Comparative Assessment of Clinical Benefit Using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Version 1.1 and the ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit Score.

Authors:  Nathan I Cherny; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Urania Dafni; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Shannon E McKernin; Martine Piccart; Nicola J Latino; Jean-Yves Douillard; Lowell E Schnipper; Mark R Somerfield; Jan Bogaerts; Dimitris Karlis; Panagiota Zygoura; Katerina Vervita; George Pentheroudakis; Josep Tabernero; Christoph Zielinski; Dana S Wollins; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Steady Increase In Prices For Oral Anticancer Drugs After Market Launch Suggests A Lack Of Competitive Pressure.

Authors:  Caroline S Bennette; Catherine Richards; Sean D Sullivan; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Trajectories of Injectable Cancer Drug Costs After Launch in the United States.

Authors:  Noa Gordon; Salomon M Stemmer; Dan Greenberg; Daniel A Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Oncology's "Hockey Stick" Moment for the Cost of Cancer Drugs-The Climate Is About to Change.

Authors:  Blase N Polite; Mark J Ratain; Allen S Lichter
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Analysis of State-Level Drug Pricing Transparency Laws in the United States.

Authors:  Martha S Ryan; Neeraj Sood
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04

10.  Financial toxicity of cancer treatment: Moving the discussion from acknowledgement of the problem to identifying solutions.

Authors:  Aakash Desai; Bishal Gyawali
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.