| Literature DB >> 32732437 |
Victor Kamoen1, Simon Calle1, Marc De Buyzere1, Frank Timmermans2.
Abstract
Recent randomised percutaneous mitral intervention trials in patients with heart failure with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) have yielded contrasting results. A 'relative load' or 'proportionality' conceptual framework for SMR has been proposed to partly explain the disparate results. The rationale behind the framework is that SMR depends on the left ventricular dimension and not vice versa. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of the proportionality parameters used in this framework and also discuss the regurgitant fraction. We also consider haemodynamic observations in SMR that may affect the interpretation and comparisons among proportionality parameters. The conclusion is that the proportionality concept remains hypothetical and requires prospective validation before envisaging its use at individual patient level for risk stratification or therapeutic decision-making. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac imaging and diagnostics; echocardiography; mitral regurgitation
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32732437 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart ISSN: 1355-6037 Impact factor: 5.994