| Literature DB >> 32732222 |
Jamie R Brewer1, Elaine Chang2, Sundeep Agrawal2, Harpreet Singh2, Daniel L Suzman2, James Xu2, Chana Weinstock2, Laura L Fernandes2, Joyce Cheng2, Lijun Zhang2, Diqiong Xie2, Kirsten B Goldberg2, Erik W Bloomquist2, Shenghui Tang2, Rajeshwari Sridhara2, Marc R Theoret2, Richard Pazdur2, Amna Ibrahim2, Julia A Beaver2.
Abstract
The development and review of combination drug regimens in oncology may present unique challenges to investigators and regulators. For regulatory approval of combination regimens, it is necessary to demonstrate the contribution of effect of each monotherapy to the overall combination. Alternative approaches to traditional designs may be needed to accelerate oncology drug development, for example, when combinations are substantially superior to available therapy, to reduce exposure to less effective therapies, and for drugs that are inactive as single agents and that in combination potentiate activity of another drug. These approaches include demonstration of activity in smaller randomized trials and/or monotherapy trials conducted in a similar disease setting. This article will discuss alternative approaches used in the development of approved drugs in combination, based on examples of recent approvals of combination regimens in renal cell carcinoma. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32732222 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-4229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 1078-0432 Impact factor: 12.531