| Literature DB >> 32731857 |
Dongling Luo1, Pengyuan Chen2, Ziyang Yang1, Yongheng Fu3, Yigao Huang1, Hezhi Li4, Jimei Chen5, Jian Zhuang6, Caojin Zhang7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adiponectin is a biomarker closely related to heart failure. However, its role in pulmonary hypertension remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the association between adiponectin and hemodynamic abnormalities, right ventricular function in patients with congenital heart disease associated pulmonary hypertension (CHD-PH).Entities:
Keywords: Adiponectin; Congenital heart disease; N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; Pulmonary hypertension; Right ventricular function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731857 PMCID: PMC7391602 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-020-01233-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.317
Baseline characteristic of the included patients
| Valid cases, n(%) | Values | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 86 (100) | 35.8 ± 13.2 |
| Gender, female | 86 (100) | 59 (68%) |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 86 (100) | 21.2 ± 4.0 |
| Hemoglobin, g/l | 86 (100) | 139.2 ± 22.9 |
| Adiponectin, ug/ml | 86 (100) | 7.9 ± 5.8 |
| NT-proBNP, pg/ml | 72 (84) | 468.6 ± 1011.5 |
| Glucose, mmol/l | 86 (100) | 4.9 ± 1.4 |
| Creatinine, umol/l | 86 (100) | 64.2 ± 15.1 |
| CHOL, mmol/l | 81 (94) | 4.4 ± 0.8 |
| TRIG, mmol/l | 81 (94) | 1.2 ± 0.9 |
| HDLC, mmol/l | 81 (94) | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
| LDLC, mmol/l | 81 (94) | 2.8 ± 0.7 |
| TRIG/HDLC | 81 (94) | 1.1 ± 1.2 |
| LVEF,% | 86 (100) | 63.6 ± 9.9 |
| LA, mm | 86 (100) | 35.9 ± 7.7 |
| LVEDD, mm | 86 (100) | 44.3 ± 10.1 |
| LVESD, mm | 86 (100) | 27.9 ± 8.3 |
| RA, mm | 86 (100) | 56.8 ± 15.8 |
| RVEDD, mm | 86 (100) | 60.4 ± 10.4 |
| TAPSE, mm | 41 (48) | 21.0 ± 5.4 |
| S′, cm/s | 41 (48) | 13.4 ± 3.9 |
| mRAP, mmHg | 86 (100) | 5.8 ± 2.9 |
| mPAP, mmHg | 86 (100) | 41.7 ± 23.7 |
| PAWP, mmHg | 86 (100) | 9.7 ± 2.9 |
| MOS,% | 86 (100) | 70.0 ± 10.5 |
| PVR, wood units | 86 (100) | 5.7 ± 5.9 |
| PI, L/min/m2 | 86 (100) | 6.8 ± 3.3 |
| CI, L/min/m2 | 86 (100) | 3.7 ± 1.0 |
| QP/QS | 86 (100) | 1.9 ± 0.9 |
| RP/RS | 86 (100) | 0.3 ± 0.3 |
Abbreviation: BMI body mass index, CHOL cholesterol, TRIG triglyceride, HDLC high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDLC high density lipoprotein cholesterol, TRIG/HDLC the ratio of TRIG and HDLC, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LA left atrium, LVEDD left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, LEVSD left ventricular end-systolic dimension, RA right atrium, RVEDD right ventricle end-diastolic dimension, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, S′ systolic velocity of lateral tricuspid annulus displacement, RVFAC right ventricular functional area change, mRAP mean right atrial pressure, mPAP mean pulmonary arterial pressure, MOS mixed venous oxygen saturation, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, PI pulmonary circulation index, CI cardiac index, QP/QS the ratio of pulmonary circulation and systemic circulation blood flow, RP/RS the ratio of pulmonary vascular resistance and systemic vascular resistance
Fig. 1Correlation between log adiponectin and log NT-proBNP. Log adiponectin is positively correlated with log NT-proBNP (r = 0.41, p = 0.0004). Log adiponectin and log NT-proBNP are log 10 scale transformation of plasma levels of adiponectin and NT-proBNP
Linear regression analysis of adiponectin, NT-proBNP and different clinical parameters
| Log Adiponectin | Log NT-proBNP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-adjusted | Adjusted | Non-adjusted | Adjusted | |
| mRAP | 1.2 (− 0.4, 2.8) 0.133 | 0.1 (−1.5, 1.7) 0.903 | 2.2 (1.0, 3.3) < 0.001 | 1.7 (0.3, 3.0) 0.020 |
| mPAP | 7.7 (− 5.2, 20.6) 0.248 | 3.8 (− 10.5, 18.1) 0.601 | 15.8 (6.9, 24.7) < 0.001 | 24.7 (14.6, 34.8) < 0.001 |
| MOS | 3.5 (− 2.2, 9.2) 0.232 | 5.5 (− 0.9, 11.9) 0.096 | −3.9 (−8.3, 0.6) 0.096 | −5.3 (− 11.0, 0.5) 0.077 |
| PVR | 0.6 (− 2.7, 3.8) 0.731 | − 1.1 (− 4.0, 1.8) 0.471 | 2.1 (− 0.3, 4.5) 0.092 | 2.7 (0.4, 4.9) 0.023 |
| PI | 2.2 (0.5, 4.0) 0.013 | 2.1 (0.2, 4.1) 0.036 | 1.0 (−0.3, 2.3) 0.150 | 0.7 (− 1.0, 2.4) 0.445 |
| CI | 0.1 (−0.5, 0.6) 0.862 | 0.2 (−0.4, 0.9) 0.477 | − 0.6 (− 1.0, − 0.2) 0.005 | −0.7 (− 1.3, − 0.2) 0.013 |
| LA | 4.3 (− 0.0, 8.6) 0.057 | 4.2 (− 0.6, 9.0) 0.089 | 3.5 (0.5, 6.5) 0.026 | 4.2 (0.2, 8.2) 0.048 |
| LVEDD | 2.4 (− 3.3, 8.2) 0.409 | 3.5 (− 3.2, 10.2) 0.311 | 1.2 (− 3.6, 6.0) 0.624 | 4.5 (− 2.0, 11.0) 0.181 |
| LVESD | 3.6 (− 1.1, 8.3) 0.139 | 3.8 (− 1.5, 9.0) 0.164 | 2.7 (− 1.1, 6.5) 0.176 | 4.7 (− 0.3, 9.7) 0.071 |
| LVEF | −8.5 (− 13.9, − 3.1) 0.003 | − 8.3 (− 13.6, − 2.9) 0.004 | −6.0 (− 10.4, − 1.6) 0.010 | −5.8 (− 11.1, − 0.5) 0.038 |
| RA | 10.4 (1.6, 19.2) 0.023 | 7.5 (− 2.0, 16.9) 0.126 | 10.7 (6.0, 15.4) < 0.001 | 6.1 (0.4, 11.8) 0.043 |
| RVEDD | 9.5 (3.9, 15.0) 0.001 | 7.2 (1.2, 13.2) 0.022 | 10.2 (6.5, 14.0) < 0.001 | 10.4 (5.8, 14.9) < 0.001 |
| TAPSE | −4.7 (− 8.6, − 0.8) 0.022 | − 4.9 (− 9.2, − 0.5) 0.036 | −5.2 (− 7.8, − 2.5) < 0.001 | −5.4 (− 9.4, − 1.5) 0.013 |
| S‘ | −3.0 (− 5.9, − 0.2) 0.042 | −3.7 (− 6.7, − 0.7) 0.024 | −2.2 (− 4.3, 0.0) 0.059 | −2.0 (− 4.8, 0.9) 0.189 |
Abbreviation: mRAP mean right atrial pressure, mPAP mean pulmonary arterial pressure, MOS mixed venous oxygen saturation, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, PI pulmonary circulation index, CI cardiac index, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LA left atrium, LVEDD left ventricular end diastolic dimension, LEVSD left ventricular end-systolic dimension, RA right atrium, RVEDD right ventricle end-diastolic dimension, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, S′ systolic velocity of lateral tricuspid annulus displacement
Adjusted, adjusted by age, gender, BMI, creatinine, TRIG/HDLC and glucose levels
Depicted are beta-estimates with 95%-confidence intervals and p-value from linear regression analysis
Fig. 2The mediation effect of adiponectin (APN) on the association between NT-proBNP and right ventricular dysfunction. a is the coefficient between log NT-ProBNP and log adiponectin (a = 0.22, 95%CI 0.04, 0.41, p = 0.023). b is the coefficient between log adiponectin and TAPSE (b = − 6.2, 95%CI -11.0, − 1.4, p = 0.02). c is the coefficient between log NT-proBNP and TAPSE (c = − 5.4, 95%CI -9.4, − 1.5, p = 0.013). The coefficient c’ between log NT-proBNP and TAPSE becomes insignificant when log adiponectin is included in the model (c’ = − 3.7, 95%CI -7.5, 0.1, p = 0.067). These results reveal that the association between NT-proBNP and right ventricular dysfunction, as assessed by TAPSE, is fully mediated by APN. TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristic curve of adiponectin and NT-proBNP. There’s a trend that adiponectin exhibited a better diagnostic efficiency as compared to NT-proBNP in patients with right ventricular dysfunction (AUC = 0.84, 95%CI 0.67–1.00; AUC = 0.74, 95%CI 0.51–0.97, respectively, p = 0.23). AUC, area under the curve