Literature DB >> 32731804

Matrix Stiffness Modulates Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Cell Fates in Three-Dimensional Hydrogels.

Christine Wang1, Sauradeep Sinha1, Xinyi Jiang2, Luke Murphy1, Sergio Fitch2, Christy Wilson3, Gerald Grant3, Fan Yang1,2.   

Abstract

Cancer progression is known to be accompanied by changes in tissue stiffness. Previous studies have primarily employed immortalized cell lines and 2D hydrogel substrates, which do not recapitulate the 3D tumor niche. How matrix stiffness affects patient-derived cancer cell fate in 3D remains unclear. In this study, we report a matrix metalloproteinase-degradable poly(ethylene-glycol)-based hydrogel platform with brain-mimicking biochemical cues and tunable stiffness (40-26,600 Pa) for 3D culture of patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft (PDTX GBM) cells. Our results demonstrate that decreasing hydrogel stiffness enhanced PDTX GBM cell proliferation, and hydrogels with stiffness 240 Pa and below supported robust PDTX GBM cell spreading in 3D. PDTX GBM cells encapsulated in hydrogels demonstrated higher drug resistance than 2D control, and increasing hydrogel stiffness further enhanced drug resistance. Such 3D hydrogel platforms may provide a valuable tool for mechanistic studies of the role of niche cues in modulating cancer progression for different cancer types.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glioblastoma; hydrogels; in vitro cancer models; patient-derived cells; stiffness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32731804      PMCID: PMC7984937          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  62 in total

Review 1.  The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca G Wells
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Synthetic materials in the study of cell response to substrate rigidity.

Authors:  Stephanie Nemir; Jennifer L West
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Expression of extracellular matrix components in a highly infiltrative in vivo glioma model.

Authors:  Rupavathana Mahesparan; Tracy-Ann Read; Morten Lund-Johansen; Kai Ove Skaftnesmo; Rolf Bjerkvig; Olav Engebraaten
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 17.088

4.  Ex vivo cultures of glioblastoma in three-dimensional hydrogel maintain the original tumor growth behavior and are suitable for preclinical drug and radiation sensitivity screening.

Authors:  Carine Jiguet Jiglaire; Nathalie Baeza-Kallee; Emilie Denicolaï; Doriane Barets; Philippe Metellus; Laetitia Padovani; Olivier Chinot; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Carla Fernandez
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 5.  Temozolomide and treatment of malignant glioma.

Authors:  H S Friedman; T Kerby; H Calvert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Hyaluronan and hyaluronectin in the extracellular matrix of human brain tumour stroma.

Authors:  B Delpech; C Maingonnat; N Girard; C Chauzy; R Maunoury; A Olivier; J Tayot; P Creissard
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 7.  Engineering strategies to mimic the glioblastoma microenvironment.

Authors:  Andrew Rape; Badriprasad Ananthanarayanan; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  Mechanisms of glioma-associated neovascularization.

Authors:  Matthew E Hardee; David Zagzag
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Peritumoral edema shown by MRI predicts poor clinical outcome in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Chen-Xing Wu; Guo-Shi Lin; Zhi-Xiong Lin; Jian-Dong Zhang; Shui-Yuan Liu; Chang-Fu Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Differential response of patient-derived primary glioblastoma cells to environmental stiffness.

Authors:  Thomas James Grundy; Ellen De Leon; Kaitlyn Rose Griffin; Brett William Stringer; Bryan William Day; Ben Fabry; Justin Cooper-White; Geraldine Margaret O'Neill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The multifaceted mechanisms of malignant glioblastoma progression and clinical implications.

Authors:  Rui Sun; Albert H Kim
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 9.237

2.  The Unfolded Protein Response Sensor PERK Mediates Stiffness-Dependent Adaptation in Glioblastoma Cells.

Authors:  Mohammad Khoonkari; Dong Liang; Marina Trombetta Lima; Tjitze van der Land; Yuanke Liang; Jianwu Sun; Amalia Dolga; Marleen Kamperman; Patrick van Rijn; Frank A E Kruyt
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Using Spheroids as Building Blocks Towards 3D Bioprinting of Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Pei Zhuang; Yi-Hua Chiang; Maria Serafim Fernanda; Mei He
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-10-21

4.  A comparative study of brain tumor cells from different age and anatomical locations using 3D biomimetic hydrogels.

Authors:  Christine Wang; Sauradeep Sinha; Xinyi Jiang; Sergio Fitch; Christy Wilson; Viola Caretti; Anitha Ponnuswami; Michelle Monje; Gerald Grant; Fan Yang
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 5.  The Interplay between Glioblastoma and Its Microenvironment.

Authors:  Mark Dapash; David Hou; Brandyn Castro; Catalina Lee-Chang; Maciej S Lesniak
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 6.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.