Literature DB >> 32731751

Lessons Learnt (Clinical Outcomes and Cost Savings) from Virtual Stone Clinic and Their Application in the Era Post-COVID-19: Prospective Outcomes over a 6-Year Period from a University Teaching Hospital.

Thomas Hughes1, Amelia Pietropaolo1, Matthew Archer1, Tania Davis1, Loretta Tear1, Bhaskar K Somani1.   

Abstract

Introduction: We introduced a nurse-led telephone-based virtual stone clinic (VSC) follow-up for the surveillance of patients with asymptomatic renal calculi or those at a high risk of recurrent kidney stone disease (KSD). The aim of this study was to look at the outcomes of VSC and its role in the post-COVID era.
Methods: Prospective outcomes audit was done for all patients referred to the VSC for a 6-year period (March 2014-April 2020). VSC is led by specialist stone nurses for on-going surveillance of KSD patients.
Results: A total of 290 patients were seen (468 individual appointments; 1.6 ± 1.0 per patient), with a mean age of 57.0 ± 15.8 years (range: 17-92) and a men-women ratio of 3:2. The referral was for surveillance of asymptomatic small renal stones (230, 79.3%); history of recurrent stone disease (45, 15.5%); solitary kidneys (5, 1.7%); cystine stones; young age; and other conditions (10, 3.4%). The mean stone size was 5.0 ± 2.7 mm, followed up with kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph (225, 77.6%) and ultrasound scan (USS) (65, 22.4%), for median duration of 12 months (range: 3-24 months). At the end, 132 patients (45.6%) remained in VSC, 106 (36.6%) were discharged, 47 (16.2%) returned to face-to-face clinic or treatment, and 5 (1.7%) had emergency admissions. Of 47 patients who returned, 23 (48.9%) developed new symptoms, 21 (44.6%) had stone growth, and 3 defaulted to face-to-face appointment. Thirty-five patients needed surgical intervention (URS-21, SWL-13, and PCNL-1) and 10 were managed conservatively. VSC reduced the cost per clinic appointment from £27.9 to £2 per patient (93% reduction), equating to a total saving of £12,006 for the study period.
Conclusion: Nurse-led VSC not only provided a safe follow-up but also allowed to substantially reduce the cost of treatment by allowing patients to be either discharged or return to a face-to-face clinic or surgical intervention if needed. Post-COVID, this model using telemedicine will have a much wider uptake and further help to optimize health care resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinic; stone; telemedicine; telephone; virtual

Year:  2020        PMID: 32731751     DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  2 in total

Review 1.  Telemedicine and Telehealth in Urology: Uptake, Impact and Barriers to Clinical Adoption.

Authors:  Nithesh Naik; Shreyas Raghavan Nandyal; Sanjana Ganesh Nayak; Milap Shah; Sufyan Ibrahim; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Ananth Patil; Gopika Suresh; Pritam A Shetty; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Rajeev Tp; Patrick Rice; Suraj Jayadeva Reddy; Nandakishore Bhat; Deepesh Garg; Piotr Chlosta; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 2.  Changes in practice patterns of nephrolithiasis in the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a review.

Authors:  Mohammad Hout; Robert Marcovich; Hemendra Shah
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.309

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.