| Literature DB >> 32731614 |
Tuo Shi1,2, Yuanman Hu1, Miao Liu1, Chunlin Li1, Chuyi Zhang1,2, Chong Liu1,2.
Abstract
With China's rapid development, urban air pollution problems occur frequently. As one of the principal components of haze, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has potential negative health effects, causing widespread concern. However, the causal interactions and dynamic relationships between socioeconomic factors and ambient air pollution are still unclear, especially in specific regions. As an important industrial base in Northeast China, Liaoning Province is a representative mode of social and economic development. Panel data including PM2.5 concentration and three socio-economic indicators of Liaoning Province from 2000 to 2015 were built. The data were first-difference stationary and the variables were cointegrated. The Granger causality test was used as the main method to test the causality. In the results, in terms of the causal interactions, economic activities, industrialization and urbanization processes all showed positive long-term impacts on changes of PM2.5 concentration. Economic growth and industrialization also significantly affected the variations in PM2.5 concentration in the short term. In terms of the contributions, industrialization contributed the most to the variations of PM2.5 concentration in the sixteen years, followed by economic growth. Though Liaoning Province, an industry-oriented region, has shown characteristics of economic and industrial transformation, policy makers still need to explore more targeted policies to address the regional air pollution issue.Entities:
Keywords: Granger causality test; air pollution; economic growth; fine particulate matter; industrialization; urbanization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731614 PMCID: PMC7432947 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155441
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Location and cities in the study area.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of surface PM2.5 concentrations in Liaoning province from 2000 to 2015.
Figure 3Scatter plot of regulatory stations that monitored PM2.5 concentrations and remote-sensed PM2.5 concentrations. Dashed red lines represent a 95% confidence interval of the fitting line.
Description of the panel data from 2000 to 2015.
| Variable | Obs. | Mean | Std. Dev | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) | 224 | 36.60 | 8.24 | 18.81 | 54.57 |
| GDPPC (Yuan, RMB) | 224 | 37,142.14 | 23,905.06 | 6184.72 | 121,457.46 |
| UIS (%) | 224 | 13.32 | 7.65 | 2.06 | 33.95 |
| IND (%) | 224 | 55.13 | 9.51 | 37.09 | 83.60 |
Figure 4Data of PM2.5 concentrations (A), GDP per capita (GDPPC) (B), proportion of urban impervious surface area (UIS) (C) and the value added by industry as a percentage of GDP (IND) (D) of fourteen cities in the panel that changed over the time series from 2000 to 2015.3.2. Panel Unit Root Test Results.
Panel unit root test results.
| Variable | Level | 1st Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | Intercept and Trend | Intercept | Intercept and Trend | |
| Levin, Lin and Chu (LLC) | ||||
| −7.4320 *** | −2.6757 *** | −6.6609 *** | 1.8893 | |
| −0.3350 | −3.3226 *** | −6.8751 *** | −7.2374 *** | |
| −13.618 *** | 1.2149 | −5.9671 *** | −17.066 *** | |
| 1.4858 | 2.3637 | −8.8109 *** | −6.2508 *** | |
| Im, Pesaran and Shin (IPS) | ||||
| −3.9769 *** | −0.5582 | −5.9219 *** | −5.0734 *** | |
| 5.0142 | −1.0338 | −5.2980 *** | −4.2049 *** | |
| −5.7427 *** | 4.40875 | −4.7635 *** | −11.892 *** | |
| 2.1611 | 4.9270 | −6.2508 *** | −6.3221 *** | |
Note: Significance: * 0.1, ** 0.05, *** 0.01.
Panel cointegration test results using the Pedroni methods.
|
|
| ||||
| Statistic | Prob. | Weighted Statistic | Prob. | ||
| Panel v-Statistic | 1.2492 | 0.1058 | 1.0894 | 0.1380 | |
| Panel rho-Statistic | 0.0337 | 0.5134 | −0.0132 | 0.4947 | |
| Panel pp-Statistic | −1.9136 ** | 0.0278 | −1.8940 ** | 0.0291 | |
| Panel ADF-Statistic | −2.1804 ** | 0.0146 | −2.5478 *** | 0.0054 | |
|
| |||||
| Statistic | Prob. | ||||
| Group rho-Statistic | 1.6771 | 0.9532 | |||
| Group pp-Statistic | −1.7092 ** | 0.0437 | |||
| Group ADF-Statistic | −3.0995 *** | 0.0010 | |||
Note: Significance: * 0.1, ** 0.05, *** 0.01.
Panel fully modified least squares regression results.
| Variable | Coefficient | Std. Error | t-Statistic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2620 *** | 0.0025 | 104.2593 | |
| 0.2236 *** | 0.0021 | 107.5758 | |
| 0.0094 *** | 0.0009 | 9.8713 |
R2 = 0.492128, Adj. R2 = 0.487221; Significance: * 0.1, ** 0.05, *** 0.01.
Panel Granger causality test results.
| Dependent Variable | Independent Variables | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-Run Causality (χ2-Wald Statistics) | Long-Run Causality | |||||
| Δ | Δ | Δ | Δ | ECT (−1) |
| |
| Δ | 6.2655 ** | 1.7088 | 5.2909 * | −0.0665 *** | −5.6409 | |
| Δ | 12.0662 *** | 0.9156 | 2.3951 | −0.0704 *** | −3.2335 | |
| Δ | 6.1390 ** | 14.3349 *** | 9.3067 *** | −0.0272 ** | −2.3615 | |
| Δ | 2.6420 | 14.4685 *** | 1.0221 | 0.0072 *** | 2.8231 | |
Significance: * 0.1, ** 0.05, *** 0.01.
Figure 5Diagram of the causal relationships between PM2.5 concentrations, GDP per capita (GDPPC), the proportion of urban impervious surface area (UIS) and the value added by industry as a percentage of GDP (IND).
Variance decomposition analysis results of pm2.5 concentrations in the panel.
| Period | S.E. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variance Decomposition of | |||||
| 1 | 0.068920 | 100.0000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
| 2 | 0.097998 | 98.17410 | 1.265334 | 0.488164 | 0.072398 |
| 3 | 0.114122 | 97.05163 | 2.419547 | 0.366743 | 0.162078 |
| 4 | 0.123131 | 95.67872 | 3.687611 | 0.410396 | 0.223269 |
| 5 | 0.128520 | 94.08125 | 4.921052 | 0.746677 | 0.251024 |
| 6 | 0.132068 | 92.35911 | 6.035212 | 1.349410 | 0.256273 |
| 7 | 0.134648 | 90.63484 | 6.970944 | 2.143034 | 0.251183 |
| 8 | 0.136672 | 89.00029 | 7.711078 | 3.044643 | 0.243994 |
| 9 | 0.138337 | 87.50652 | 8.266401 | 3.988203 | 0.238875 |
| 10 | 0.139744 | 86.17206 | 8.662361 | 4.928241 | 0.237340 |
| 11 | 0.140948 | 84.99492 | 8.928941 | 5.836583 | 0.239554 |
| 12 | 0.141987 | 83.96262 | 9.095029 | 6.697198 | 0.245149 |
| 13 | 0.142889 | 83.05865 | 9.185900 | 7.501821 | 0.253625 |
| 14 | 0.143674 | 82.26610 | 9.222504 | 8.246885 | 0.264513 |
| 15 | 0.144360 | 81.56939 | 9.221616 | 8.931577 | 0.277415 |
| 16 | 0.144962 | 80.95495 | 9.196351 | 9.556689 | 0.292006 |
Figure 6Results of the impulse response of lnPM2.5 to Cholesky one S.D. innovations of the variables.
Figure 7Scatter plot and Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) fitting line between PM2.5 concentrations and GDP per capita.