| Literature DB >> 32731572 |
Imam Prasetyo1,2, Puspita Rahayu Permatasari1, William Teja Laksmana1, Rochmadi Rochmadi1,2, Won-Chun Oh3, Teguh Ariyanto1,2.
Abstract
Porous carbon has been widely used for many applications e.g., adsorbents, catalysts, catalyst supports, energy storage and gas storage due to its outstanding properties. In this paper, characteristics of porous carbon prepared by carbonization of lignin from various biomasses are presented. Various biomasses, i.e., mangosteen peel, corncob and coconut shell, were processed using ethanol as an organosolv solvent. The obtained lignin was characterized using a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrophotometer and a viscosimeter to investigate the success of extraction and lignin properties. The results showed that high temperature is favorable for the extraction of lignin using the organosolv process. The FTIR spectra show the success of lignin extraction using the organosolv process because of its similarity to the standard lignin spectra. The carbonization process of lignin was performed at 600 and 850 °C to produce carbon from lignin, as well as to investigate the effect of temperature. A higher pyrolysis temperature will produce a porous carbon with a high specific surface area, but it will lower the yield of the produced carbon. At 850 °C temperature, the highest surface area up to 974 m2/g was achieved.Entities:
Keywords: carbonization; extraction; organosolv process; porous carbon
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731572 PMCID: PMC7435991 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25153428
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Yield comparison of lignin extracted using organosolv and soda processes. Data of lignin yield of mangosteen peel at 70 °C taken from our previous study [18].
Figure 2Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) band from (a) LMP, (b) LCC, (c) LCS, dan (d) LMPT. Y-axis is transmittance.
Peaks Observed in FTIR Spectra.
| Sample | Wavenumber (cm−1) | Functionality |
|---|---|---|
| LMP; LCC; LCS; LMPT | 1600 | C=C stretching of the aromatic ring |
| LCS; LMPT | 1510 | Aromatic skeleton vibrations |
| LCC; LCS; LMPT | 1460 | C-H deformation (asymmetric in -CH3 and -CH2-) |
| LMP; LCS; LMPT | 1422 | C-H deformation in lignin |
| LMP; LMPT | 1283 | C-H stretching of G units |
| LMP; LCC; LCS; LMPT | 1162 | H, G, and S units of lignin |
| LMP; LCC; LCS; LMPT | 1110 | Aromatic C-H deformation of syringyl units |
| LMP; LMPT | 917 | C-H bending of syringyl units, aromatic ring |
| LCS; LMPT | 840 | C-H bending of syringyl units |
Viscosity of lignin.
| Lignin Source | Viscosity (cP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Organosolv Process | Soda Process | |
| Mangosteen peel | 1.43/1.97 (at 150 °C) | 1.23 |
| Corn cob | 1.63 | 1.17 |
| Coconut shell | 1.53 | 1.20 |
Figure 3Percentage of product/precursor at carbonization temperatures 600 °C and 850 °C. Data of carbonization yield of mangosteen peel taken from our previous study [18].
Figure 4SEM images of carbon fibers: (a) LMPT-600; (b) LMPT-850; (c) LMP-600; (d) LMP-850; (e) LCC-600; (f) LCC-850; (g) LCS-600; (h) LCS-850. Figure (c) and (d) taken from our previous study [18], Copyright AIP Publishing, 2020.
Figure 5(A) Adsorption and desorption of nitrogen in carbon mangosteen peel lignin extracted using organosolv at 150 °C; (B) QSDFT-N2 pore size distribution of carbon mangosteen peel lignin extracted by using organosolv at 150 °C.
Figure 6Adsorption and desorption of nitrogen in carbon (A) corncob lignin; (B) coconut shell lignin.
Figure 7QSDFT-N2 pore size distribution of carbon (A) corncob lignin; (B) coconut shell lignin.
Structural pore properties of carbon. Data of LMP-600 and LMP-850 taken from our previous study [18].
| Characteristics | LMPT-600 | LMPT-850 | LMP-600 | LMP-850 | LCC-600 | LCC-850 | LCS-600 | LCS-850 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface area (SBET), m2/g | 567 | 974 | 205 | 595 | 349 | 820 | 333 | 781 |
| Mesopore area (Smeso), m2/g | 110 | 153 | 85 | 42 | 28 | 59 | 58 | 50 |
| %Smeso | 19.5 | 15.67 | 41.76 | 7.06 | 8.06 | 7.18 | 17.55 | 6.34 |
| Total pore volume, cm3/g | 0.37 | 0.55 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.38 | 0.21 | 0.35 |
| Mesopore volume (Vmeso), cm3/g | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.07 |
| %Vmeso | 48.4 | 40.21 | 72.40 | 23.8 | 17.03 | 22.61 | 45.27 | 20.64 |
| Mean pore diameter, nm | 2.50 | 2.04 | 3.04 | 1.47 | 1.38 | 1.64 | 1.88 | 1.45 |