| Literature DB >> 32731469 |
Edyta Horosz1, Andrzej Pomian1, Aneta Zwierzchowska1, Wojciech Lisik2, Wojciech Majkusiak1, Paweł Tomasik1, Beata Rutkowska1, Joana Skalska1, Małgorzata Siemion1, Dominika Banasiuk1, Ewa Barcz1.
Abstract
The data concerning epidemiological determinants of the bladder neck (BN) mobility are scarce. The aim of the study was to determine epidemiological features and identify factors influencing BN position at rest and BN mobility in patients without pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Seven hundred and ninety-six patients that attended two outpatient clinics were enrolled in the study. Position and mobility of the BN were measured with the use of pelvic floor ultrasound. Demographic and functional factors that were hypothesized to influence BN mobility were assessed. Vaginal deliveries (VDs) and age ≥65 were associated with lower BN position at rest. Higher BN mobility was observed in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). In obese women, higher BN position and lower BN mobility was observed compared to non-obese women, and it was correlated with longer urethras in this group of patients. VDs and their number were associated with increased BN mobility, independently of body mass index (BMI). To conclude, obesity, VDs, and age are factors associated with changes in bladder neck position at rest and its mobility. Higher BMI correlates with restricted BN mobility, and, therefore, the incidence of SUI in obese patients is probably not connected to BN hypermobility.Entities:
Keywords: bladder neck mobility; female urethra; ultrasound; urethral mobility
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731469 PMCID: PMC7464971 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1The technique of bladder neck (BN) position measurement.
Cohort description and analyzed demographic features (n = 796).
| Variable | Mean | Minimum | Maximum | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 53.4 | 18.0 | 85.0 | 13.3 |
| Height (cm) | 164.2 | 145.0 | 190.0 | 6.1 |
| Weight (kg) | 85.6 | 44.0 | 176.0 | 25.3 |
| BMI | 31.7 | 16.6 | 70.5 | 8.8 |
| No of deliveries | 1.9 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 1.1 |
| No of VDs | 1.7 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 1.2 |
| No of cesarean sections | 0.2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 |
| No of vacuum/forceps deliveries | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.1 |
| Average birth weight (VDs only) (g) | 3432 | 650 | 5050 | 500 |
| Maximum birth weight (VDs only) (g) | 3602 | 650 | 5850 | 555 |
| Cumulative birth weight (VDs only) (g) | 7045 | 650 | 30,800 | 3460 |
| Age at 1st VD (years) | 23.9 | 14.0 | 40.0 | 3.9 |
| Age at 2nd VD (years) | 27.5 | 15.0 | 43.0 | 4.6 |
| Age at last VD (years) | 28.6 | 17.0 | 46.0 | 5.3 |
| Urethral length (mm) | 30.2 | 19.0 | 48.1 | 4.3 |
| BN position at rest (mm) | 10.0 | −31.8 | 29.9 | 7.0 |
| BN position during the VM | −4.8 | −37.1 | 24.8 | 9.3 |
| BN mobility (rest–VM) (mm) | 14.9 | 0.3 | 42.9 | 7.1 |
BMI–body mass index; BN—bladder neck; VD—vaginal delivery; VM—Valsalva maneuver.
Bladder neck position at rest, during the Valsalva maneuver, and bladder neck mobility in examined groups of patients.
| BN | At Rest [mm] | During the VM [mm] | BN Mobility (rest-VM) [mm] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | ||||
| Whole Group | 10.0 ± 7.0 | −4.8 ± 9.3 | 14.9 ± 7.1 | |
| Obese | 11.7 ± 6.8 | −2.0 ± 9.6 | 13.6 ± 7.4 | |
| Non-Obese | 8.7 ± 6.9 | −7.1 ± 8.5 | 15.8 ± 6.6 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| No of VDs = 0 | 13.4 ± 6.0 | 1.3 ± 8.5 | 12.1 ± 6.7 | |
| No of VDs > 0 | 9.2 ± 7.0 | −6.2 ± 8.9 | 15.5 ± 7.0 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| <65 years | 11.1 ± 6.4 | −4.1 ± 9.2 | 15.1 ± 7.2 | |
| ≥65 years | 6.4 ± 7.7 | −7.4 ± 9.1 | 13.8 ± 6.3 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.05 | |
| Obese with VD = 0 | 14.5 ± 5.9 | 3.3 ± 7.8 | 11.2 ± 6.3 | |
| Obese with VD > 0 | 10.5 ± 6.8 | −4.1 ± 9.3 | 14.6 ± 7.6 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Non-obese with VD = 0 | 10.8 ± 5.4 | −3.4 ± 8.0 | 14.2 ± 7.2 | |
| Non-obese with VD > 0 | 8.5 ± 7.0 | −7.6 ± 8.4 | 16 ± 6.5 | |
|
| <0.05 | <0.01 | Ns | |
| Obese < 65 years | 12.8 ± 6.3 | −1.1 ± 9.6 | 13.9 ± 7.8 | |
| Obese ≥ 65 years | 7.0 ± 6.8 | −5.5 ± 8.1 | 12.5 ± 5.5 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | Ns | |
| Non-obese < 65 years | 9.6 ± 6.2 | −6.6 ± 8.1 | 16.2 ± 6.5 | |
| Non-obese ≥ 65 years | 6.1 ± 8.2 | −8.6 ± 9.4 | 14.7 ± 6.6 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.05 | <0.05 | |
Data are given as mean, ± SD.; BN—bladder neck; VD—vaginal delivery; VM—Valsalva maneuver; ns—not significant.
Figure 2Associations between bladder neck mobility, urethral length, and body mass index (BMI).
Bladder neck position at rest, during the Valsalva maneuver, and bladder neck mobility in patient with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that required anti-incontinence procedures compared to women without SUI or with minor incontinence not requiring surgical intervention.
| BN Position | At Rest [mm] | During the VM [mm] | BN Mobility (Rest-VM) [mm] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | ||||
| Not scheduled for anti-incontinence surgery | 11.1 ± 7.7 | −2.7 ± 10.3 | 13.8 ± 7.2 | |
| Scheduled for anti-incontinence surgery | 8.7 ± 5.8 | −7.4 ± 7.2 | 16.1 ± 6.8 | |
|
| ||||
Data are given as mean, ± SD; BN—bladder neck; VM—Valsalva maneuver.
Figure 3Correlation between bladder neck mobility and number of vaginal deliveries.
Figure 4Correlation between the number of vaginal deliveries and bladder neck mobility in non-obese and obese women (p < 0.001).
Figure 5Correlation between BN mobility and BMI.
Figure 6Correlation between BN mobility and BMI in subgroups of non-obese and obese women.
Figure 7Correlation between bladder neck mobility and BMI, relative to the number of vaginal deliveries.