| Literature DB >> 32731466 |
Shufang He1, Yang Qiu1, Jing Xu2.
Abstract
Elastic optical networks (EONs) can make service accommodation more flexible and precise by employing efficient routing and spectrum allocation (RSA) algorithms. In order to improve the efficiency of RSA algorithms, the advanced-reservation technique was introduced into designing RSA algorithms. However, few of these advanced-reservation-based RSA algorithms were focused on the unavailable spectrum resources in EONs. In this paper, we propose an Advanced-Reservation-based Invalid-Spectrum-Aware (AR-ISA) resource allocation algorithm to improve the networking performance and the resource alignment of EONs. By employing a new index, Invalid Spectrum Rate (ISR), to record the proportion of unavailable spectrum resources in EONs, the proposed AR-ISA algorithm set a network load threshold to trigger the postponement of an arriving service. Compared with the traditional slack-based AR mechanism, the proposed algorithm has more concerns about the current spectrum usage of the path designated by the service than the conflicts between AR services and other existing services. To further increase the networking performance, the proposed algorithm adopts defragmentation to increase the number of available spectrum resources when postponing a service. Theoretical analysis and simulation results show that the proposed AR-ISA algorithm has obvious effectiveness in reducing the service blocking rate and increasing the spectrum alignment rate.Entities:
Keywords: advanced reservation; blocking probability; defragmentation; elastic optical network; invalid spectrum rate; spectrum alignment rate
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731466 PMCID: PMC7435904 DOI: 10.3390/s20154190
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Modulation formats vs. their corresponding transmission range.
| Transmission Range (km) | Modulation Level(bit/Hz) | Modulation Format |
|---|---|---|
| 9600 | 1 | BPSK |
| 4800 | 2 | QPSK |
| 2400 | 3 | 8-QAM |
| 1200 | 4 | 16-QAM |
Figure 1An illustrative example for the proposed Advanced-Reservation-based Invalid-Spectrum-Aware (AR-ISA) algorithm. (a) The network topology employed and the usage of all frequency slots (FSs) at a certain time, (b) after FSs are released on links L1 and L2, (c) available FSs on links L1 and L2 found for the service.
A summary of acronyms.
| Full Name | Abbreviation |
|---|---|
| EONs | Elastic optical networks |
| RSA | Routing and spectrum allocation |
| AR-ISA | Advanced-reservation-based invalid-spectrum-aware |
| ISR | Invalid spectrum rate |
| WDM | Wavelength division multiplexing |
| SRU | Spectrum resource usage |
| DSTF | Degree of spectrum-time fragmentation |
| RMSA | Routing, modulation and spectrum assignment |
| TSC | Time-spectrum consecutiveness |
| FSs | Frequency slots |
| MISR | Maximum invalid spectrum ratio |
| NSFNET | National science foundation network |
Figure 2National science foundation network (NSFNET) topology.
Parameter settings in simulations.
| Parameters | Settings |
|---|---|
| Network topology | NSF-Net |
| K, number of candidate paths | 3 |
| F, number of frequency slots | 320 |
| Bandwidth of one frequency slot | 12.5 GHz |
| Number of guard band | 1 |
| Optional modulation formats | BPSK, QPSK, 8-QAM, 16-QAM |
| Bits per symbol of different modulation formats | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
| Reachable distance of different modulation formats (km) | 9600, 4800, 2400, 1200 |
| Type of services (Gb/s) | 50, 100, 150, 200 |
| Proportion of different types of services | 1:1:1:1 |
| Arrival rate of services | Poisson distribution model |
| Duration time of each service | Negative exponential distribution |
| Number of services per simulation | 5 × 106 |
Figure 3Simulation results of the service blocking probability. (a) Simulation results on the service blocking probability vs. traffic load with different values of maximum invalid spectrum ratio (MISR) when no spectrum defragmentation is adopted, (b) simulation results on the service blocking probability vs. traffic load with different values of MISR when spectrum defragmentation is adopted.
Figure 4Simulation results of the spectrum alignment rate. (a) Simulation results of the spectrum alignment rate vs. the traffic load with different values of MISR when no spectrum defragmentation is adopted, (b) simulation results of the spectrum alignment rate vs. the traffic load with different values of MISR when spectrum defragmentation is adopted.