| Literature DB >> 32731442 |
Xiaoyong Chen1, Hao Mi2, Kai Cui3, Rongyan Zhou1, Shujun Tian1, Leying Zhang2.
Abstract
As the byproduct of finger millet, millet straw is a new forage resource of ruminants. The effect of the combined utilization of millet straw with corn straw on fattening lamb production is seldom reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different proportions of millet straw instead of corn straw on the growth performance, blood metabolites, immune response, meat yield, and quality of fattening lamb. Sixty-three-month-old healthy Small-Tailed Han sheep crossbred rams with an average initial weight of 19.28 ± 2.95 kg were randomly divided into four groups, with three replicates in each group and five lambs in each replicate. The replacement ratio of millet straw of each group (Group I, II, III, IV) was 0%, 25%, 35%, 50% at the first stage (the first two months) and 0%, 20%, 28%, 40% in the second period (final two months), respectively. The experiment lasted 4 months 10 days of the pre-feeding period. The results indicated that the body weight gain and average daily gain of group Ⅱ were significantly higher than those of group Ⅰ and group Ⅳ (p < 0.05). The concentration of total protein in group Ⅳ was significantly increased compared to those of the other three groups at the second stage (p < 0.05), which proved that the protein synthesis metabolism capacity was improved with the addition of millet straw. The concentration of the plasma glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase and lactic dehydrogenase of lambs was significantly decreased in group Ⅱ (p < 0.05). The combination of millet straw and corn straw had no impact on the glucose, total cholesterol, and triglycerides metabolism (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the pre-slaughter weight, carcass weight, dressing percentage, loin-eye area, and GR value among the four groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the immune response and meat quality were not impacted by the different proportions of millet and corn forage diets. The results showed that the combined utilization of millet straw with corn straw could improve the blood biochemistry metabolism capability of fattening lambs. The replacement of 50% of corn straw with millet straw could improve the growth performance and be an application in fattening lamb production.Entities:
Keywords: blood metabolites; carcass traits; corn straw; daily gain; lamb; millet straw
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731442 PMCID: PMC7459585 DOI: 10.3390/ani10081285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Proportion and chemical composition of the experimental diets.
| Item | Firs Stage | Second Period | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group Ⅰ | Group Ⅱ | Group Ⅲ | Group Ⅳ | Group Ⅰ | Group Ⅱ | Group Ⅲ | Group Ⅳ | |
| Ingredient | ||||||||
| Corn | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 39.00 | 39.00 | 39.00 | 39.00 |
| Til meal | 10.75 | 10.75 | 10.75 | 10.75 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 |
| Wheat bran | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 3.60 | 3.60 | 3.60 | 3.60 |
| Soybean meal | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
| Til meal | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Salt | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Calcium bicarbonate | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| Calcium hydrophosphate | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Premix | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Corn straw | 50.00 | 25.00 | 15.00 | 0.00 | 40.00 | 20.00 | 12.00 | 0.00 |
| Millet straw | 0.00 | 25.00 | 35.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 20.00 | 28.00 | 40.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Nutrient levels | ||||||||
| Digestible energy (MJ/Kg) | 10.55 | 10.53 | 10.53 | 10.52 | 11.40 | 11.39 | 11.38 | 11.38 |
| Crude Protein (%) | 12.99 | 13.06 | 13.32 | 13.37 | 11.88 | 12.02 | 12.50 | 12.44 |
| Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 57.38 | 55.14 | 56.60 | 54.44 | 45.45 | 45.97 | 46.02 | 44.49 |
| Acid detergent fiber (%) | 33.88 | 33.44 | 32.01 | 32.99 | 25.41 | 27.46 | 28.31 | 26.95 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.53 |
| Total phosphorus (%) | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.20 |
The effect of different diets on the lambs’ growth performance.
| Item | Group Ⅰ | Group Ⅱ | Group Ⅲ | Group Ⅳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBW (kg) | 42.04 ± 2.88 | 46.15 ± 3.88 | 44.49 ± 3.81 | 42.26 ± 5.22 |
| TGW (kg) | 23.07 ± 2.67 b | 27.36 ± 4.02 a | 24.51 ± 3.52 ab | 23.22 ± 4.14 b |
| ADG (g) | 192.21 ± 22.27 b | 227.99 ± 33.49 a | 204.22 ± 29.31 ab | 193.46 ± 34.48 b |
FBW: final body weight is the terminal weight during the fattening period; ADG, average daily gain of lambs during fattening experiment; TGW: total gain weight is the average gain in weight of all the lambs from initiation to termination during the experiment. Superscript letters shared in common between the groups indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05), and superscript letters shared in different between the groups indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Effect of the different diets on the plasma metabolites in lambs.
| Item | Stage | Group Ⅰ | Group Ⅱ | Group Ⅲ | Group Ⅳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP, g/L | Initiation | 54.10 ± 3.25 | 55.02 ± 2.54 | 55.08 ± 1.29 | 53.03 ± 1.06 |
| Final | 30.75 ± 4.47 Bb | 31.22 ± 4.32 Bb | 33.27 ± 8.35 ABb | 43.25 ± 2.94 Aa | |
| GPT, U/L | Initiation | 15.00 ± 5.5 | 15.75 ± 1.71 | 13.25 ± 3.77 | 12.50 ± 3.00 |
| Final | 8.00 ± 2.12 ab | 7.75 ± 1.89 ab | 6.50 ± 1.91 b | 10.80 ± 2.49 a | |
| GOT,(U/L) | Initiation | 126.00 ± 22.79 | 117.00 ± 9.13 | 127.25 ± 27.55 | 123.00 ± 24.55 |
| Final | 79.2 ± 16.16 ab | 66.20 ± 16.95 a | 67.00 ± 25.16 ab | 95.67 ± 24.74 b | |
| Glucose, mmol/L | Initiation | 4.40 ± 0.46 Aa | 4.07 ± 0.73 Aba | 3.76 ± 0.26 Abab | 3.36 ± 0.41 Bb |
| Final | 2.94 ± 0.32 | 2.63 ± 0.49 | 3.29 ± 1.15 | 3.78 ± 0.79 | |
| Urea, mmol/L | Initiation | 7.61 ± 2.35 Aa | 10.04 ± 1.19 Aba | 13.46 ± 2.52 Bb | 13.31 ± 1.51 Bb |
| Final | 4.74 ± 1.04 Abab | 3.68 ± 0.60 Bb | 5.15 ± 0.56 Aba | 5.81 ± 1.34 Aa | |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | Initiation | 1.12 ± 0.19 | 1.22 ± 0.08 | 1.15 ± 0.21 | 1.22 ± 0.21 |
| Final | 0.73 ± 0.26 | 0.75 ± 0.22 | 0.92 ± 0.25 | 0.93 ± 0.26 | |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | Initiation | 0.37 ± 0.12 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.05 |
| Final | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.28 ± 0.06 | |
| Lactic dehydrogenase, U/L | Initiation | 454.67 ± 32.88 | 429.60 ± 23.73 | 455.00 ± 54.83 | 420.75 ± 50.08 |
| Final | 407.75 ± 57.30 Aab | 283.5 ± 34.38 Bc | 342.33 ± 62.95 Abb | 467.67 ± 34.56 Aa |
TP, total protein; GPT in plasma, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase; GOT, glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase; GPT and GOT were important liver transaminases for metabolism. Superscript letters shared in common between the groups indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05), superscript lowercase (p < 0.05) and capital letters (p < 0.01) shared in different between the groups indicate significant difference.
Effect of different diets on the immune capacity of the lambs.
| Item | Group Ⅰ | Group Ⅱ | Group Ⅲ | Group Ⅳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ig G, ug/mL | 537.65 ± 60.62 | 564.70 ± 86.30 | 660.42 ± 93.39 | 567.84 ± 90.41 |
| Ig M, ug/mL | 371.21 ± 65.45 | 378.20 ± 45.55 | 385.31 ± 40.56 | 336.45 ± 20.00 |
| IFN-γ, pg/mL | 587.05 ± 121.83 | 535.54 ± 69.87 | 556.35 ± 92.87 | 609.39 ± 126.91 |
| IL-2, pg/mL | 710.23 ± 85.85 | 670.93 ± 192.32 | 701.85 ± 161.57 | 656.76 ± 63.71 |
| IL-6, pg/mL | 87.22 ± 14.89 | 99.93 ± 12.72 | 95.81 ± 21.30 | 80.42 ± 18.8 |
| GSH-Px, pg/mL | 1240.22 ± 362.02 | 1294.02 ± 358.65 | 1252.64 ± 274.79 | 1343.53 ± 389.56 |
| T-AOC, U/mL | 19.55 ± 4.29 | 20.40 ± 3.08 | 19.64 ± 5.26 | 21.64 ± 4.80 |
| C3, ug/mL | 35.86 ± 10.32 | 36.61 ± 16.82 | 41.91 ± 5.39 | 40.13 ± 8.75 |
| C4, ug/mL | 12.81 ± 1.31 | 13.47 ± 2.09 | 12.50 ± 2.35 | 12.75 ± 3.53 |
Ig G, immunoglobulin G; Ig M, immunoglobulin M; Ig G and Ig M were members of the immunoglobulin family; IFN-γ, interferon-γ. IL-2, interleukin-2; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-2 and IL-6 were cytokines correlated with immunity; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; GSH-Px and T-AOC represent the oxidation resistance of the organism; C3, complement C3; C4, complement C4. C3 and C4 were important members of the complement system in immune capacity.
Effects of different diets on the carcass traits.
| Item | Group Ⅰ | Group Ⅱ | Group Ⅲ | Group Ⅳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BWS, kg | 42.58 ± 3.94 | 41.47 ± 5.74 | 43.52 ± 4.82 | 44.90 ± 5.61 |
| Carcass weight, kg | 20.56 ± 3.25 | 20.78 ± 3.18 | 20.93 ± 2.20 | 21.69 ± 3.26 |
| Dressing percentage, % | 48.58 ± 3.65 | 49.51 ± 2.01 | 48.12 ± 1.01 | 48.19 ± 1.98 |
| GR value, mm | 11.20 ± 0.52 | 11.11 ± 0.41 | 11.67 ± 0.77 | 11.89 ± 0.63 |
| Loin-eye area, cm2 | 15.71 ± 1.51 | 16.81 ± 3.83 | 16.92 ± 2.31 | 16.68 ± 3.03 |
BWS, body weight at slaughter.
Effects of different diets on the meat quality.
| Item | Group Ⅰ | Group Ⅱ | Group Ⅲ | Group Ⅳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH1 | 6.29 ± 0.28 | 6.09 ± 0.24 | 6.14 ± 0.16 | 6.14 ± 0.12 |
| pH24 | 5.60 ± 0.25 | 5.79 ± 0.16 | 5.71 ± 0.14 | 5.72 ± 0.27 |
| Cooked meat percentage, % | 57.73 ± 2.80 | 57.64 ± 3.65 | 58.54 ± 3.64 | 56.80 ± 2.23 |
| Water lose rate, % | 50.79 ± 2.39 | 50.33 ± 2.01 | 50.21 ± 2.45 | 50.15 ± 2.28 |
| Shear force, N | 54.28 ± 3.61 | 50.15 ± 9.76 | 53.60 ± 3.23 | 49.98 ± 4.50 |
| Marbling score | 1.80 ± 0.45 | 2.00 ± 0.70 | 1.80 ± 0.84 | 2.60 ± 0.89 |