| Literature DB >> 32731414 |
Xiang Zhu1,2,3, Li Li1, Tom Hsiang4, Yuping Zha5, Zhixiong Zhou1,3,6, Ran Chen1, Xian Wang1, Qinglai Wu1,2,3, Junkai Li1,2,3.
Abstract
Rhus potaninii Maxim, a type of sumac, is an economically important tree widely cultivated in mountainous areas of western and central China. A gall, called the bellied gallnut, induced by the aphid, Kaburagia rhusicola Takagi, is important in the food, medical, and chemical industries in China. Volatiles from R. potaninii were found to attract K. rhusicola, but little is known about them. The chemical composition of these volatiles was investigated using GC-MS analysis and Y-tube olfactometer methods. Twenty-five compounds accounting for 55.3% of the volatiles were identified, with the highest proportion of 1-(4-ethylphenyl)ethanone (11.8%), followed by 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methylphenyl)ethanone (11.2%) and p-cymen-7-ol (7.1%). These findings provide a theoretical basis for the preparation of attractants and could eventually lead to increased bellied gallnut yield.Entities:
Keywords: Kaburagia rhusicola Takagi; Rhus potaninii Maxim; attractant activity; chemical composition
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731414 PMCID: PMC7435823 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25153412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Device of Y-shape olfactometer test.
Behavioral responses of Kaburagia rhusicola to R. potaninii volatiles or the control solvent dichloromethane in three experiments with 50 insects in each experiment after 15 min of exposure.
| Treatment | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Selection Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 37 | 34 | 33 | 69.3 ± 2.4 a a |
|
| 6 | 8 | 7 | 14.0 ± 1.2 b |
a Letters following the mean percentage (±SE) denote significant differences (one-way ANOVA, and t-test for two samples with p < 0.05), based on three replicates per experimental set.
Volatile components of the branches of R. potaninii tree.
| No. | Retention Time (min) | Compound | Mol. Weight | Molecular | Class of Compound | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.088 | Ethylbenzene | 106 | C8H10 | Arene | 1.75 ± 0.28 a |
| 2 | 9.292 | 106 | C8H10 | Arene | 0.84 ± 0.10 | |
| 3 | 12.915 | Styrene | 104 | C8H8 | Alkene | 1.26 ± 0.18 |
| 4 | 13.883 | Octanal | 128 | C8H16O | Aldehyde | 2.02 ± 0.12 |
| 5 | 16.798 | Tetradecane | 198 | C14H30 | Alkane | 0.26 ± 0.05 |
| 6 | 16.910 | Nonanal | 142 | C9H18O | Aldehyde | 1.14 ± 0.12 |
| 7 | 18.169 | 1-Ethyl-3-vinylbenzene | 132 | C10H12 | Alkene | 0.55 ± 0.10 |
| 8 | 18.461 | 1-Ethyl-4-vinylbenzene | 132 | C10H12 | Alkene | 0.99 ± 0.16 |
| 9 | 19.546 | Pentadecane | 212 | C15H32 | Alkane | 0.66 ± 0.15 |
| 10 | 19.627 | 2-Ethylhexan-1-ol | 130 | C8H18O | Alcohol | 3.35 ± 0.19 |
| 11 | 20.526 | Benzaldehyde | 106 | C7H6O | Aldehyde | 0.42 ± 0.03 |
| 12 | 20.663 | 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydronaphthalene | 132 | C10H12 | Arene | 0.35 ± 0.15 |
| 13 | 21.798 | Longifolene | 204 | C15H24 | Tricyclic sesquiterpenes | 2.53 ± 0.17 |
| 14 | 23.845 | Acetophenone | 120 | C8H8O | Ketone | 0.50 ± 0.04 |
| 15 | 25.265 | 3-Ethylbenzaldehyde | 134 | C9H10O | Aldehyde | 3.32 ± 0.28 |
| 16 | 26.003 | Benzaldehyde, 4-ethyl- | 134 | C9H10O | aldehyde | 2.07 ± 0.26 |
| 17 | 26.010 | Isophthalaldehyde | 134 | C8H6O2 | Aldehyde | 1.32 ± 0.27 |
| 18 | 26.078 | Naphthalene | 128 | C10H8 | Arene | 0.38 ± 0.04 |
| 19 | 28.181 | 1-(4-Ethylphenyl)ethanone | 148 | C10H12O | Ketone | 11.84 ± 1.79 |
| 20 | 28.937 | 4-Vinylbenzoic acid | 148 | C9H8O2 | Acid | 0.50 ± 0.11 |
| 21 | 29.167 | 5-Allyl-1,3-benzodioxole | 162 | C10H10O2 | Alkene | 0.34 ± 0.05 |
| 22 | 31.319 | 150 | C10H14O | Aromatic alcohol | 7.08 ± 1.23 | |
| 23 | 31.698 | 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methylphenyl)ethanone | 150 | C9H10O2 | Ketone | 11.20 ± 1.39 |
| 24 | 36.040 | 2,3-dimethylphenol | 122 | C8H10O | Phenol | 0.29 ± 0.08 |
| 25 | 38.757 | 1,1′-(1,4-phenylene)diethanone | 162 | C10H10O2 | Ketone | 0.40 ± 0.06 |
| Total | 55.33 ± 4.64 |
a The volatile sample collected had three replicates (Mean ± SD).