Literature DB >> 32731261

Training Load and Recovery During a Pre-Olympic Season in Professional Rhythmic Gymnasts.

Paula Barreiros Debien1, Bernardo Miloski2, Francisco Zacaron Werneck3, Thiago Ferreira Timoteo1, Camila Ferezin4, Maurício Gattás Bara Filho1, Tim J Gabbett5,6.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Rhythmic gymnastics requires a high level of complexity and perfection of technical gestures, associated with well-developed physical and artistic capacities. The training-load and recovery profiles of rhythmic gymnasts across a season are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the training load and recovery of professional rhythmic gymnasts during 1 season.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
SETTING: Brazilian National Training Center of Rhythmic Gymnastics and competition facilities. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Eight gymnasts from the Brazilian national senior rhythmic gymnastics group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Session rating of perceived exertion (session-RPE) and total quality recovery (TQR) scores were collected daily for 43 weeks. We obtained the session-RPE after each session and TQR score before the first session of the day. Performances during 5 competitions were also recorded. The season was divided into 8 periods. Total weekly internal training load (wITL), training intensity, frequency, duration, recovery, and acute : chronic workload ratio were calculated for analysis.
RESULTS: The season mean wITL was 10 381 ± 4894 arbitrary units, mean session-RPE score was 5.0 ± 1.6, and mean TQR score was 12.8 ± 1.3. The gymnasts trained an average of 8.7 ± 2.9 sessions per week, with a mean duration of 219 ± 36 minutes. Each competitive period showed increased wITL compared with the previous period. Training-load variables (wITL and session-RPE) and recovery were inversely correlated. Gymnasts were poorly recovered (TQR < 13) during 50.9% of the season (n = 167 times), especially during competitive weeks. Spikes in load (acute : chronic workload ratio ≥ 1.5) occurred across 18.1% of the season (n = 55 times).
CONCLUSIONS: The training-load variables and recovery changed throughout a professional rhythmic gymnastics group season, mainly during competitive periods. The correct distribution of training load is critical to ensure that gymnasts are entering competitions in a recovered state. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute : chronic workload ratio; monitoring; session rating of perceived exertion; total quality recovery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32731261      PMCID: PMC7534931          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-402.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  28 in total

1.  Seasonal Training Load Distribution of Professional Futsal Players: Effects on Physical Fitness, Muscle Damage and Hormonal Status.

Authors:  Bernardo Miloski; Victor H de Freitas; Fábio Y Nakamura; Francine C de A Nogueira; Maurício G Bara-Filho
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  High training workloads alone do not cause sports injuries: how you get there is the real issue.

Authors:  Tim J Gabbett; Billy T Hulin; Peter Blanch; Rod Whiteley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model.

Authors:  G Kenttä; P Hassmén
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  To Couple or not to Couple? For Acute:Chronic Workload Ratios and Injury Risk, Does it Really Matter?

Authors:  Tim J Gabbett; Billy Hulin; Peter Blanch; Paul Chapman; David Bailey
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 5.  Debunking the myths about training load, injury and performance: empirical evidence, hot topics and recommendations for practitioners.

Authors:  Tim J Gabbett
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Sensitivity of physiological and psychological markers to training load intensification in volleyball players.

Authors:  Victor H Freitas; Fabio Y Nakamura; Bernardo Miloski; Dietmar Samulski; Mauricio G Bara-Filho
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Gymnastics injury incidence during the 2008, 2012 and 2016 Olympic Games: analysis of prospectively collected surveillance data from 963 registered gymnasts during Olympic Games.

Authors:  Pascal Edouard; Kathrin Steffen; Astrid Junge; Michel Leglise; Torbjørn Soligard; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Athletes' perception of the causes of injury in gymnastics.

Authors:  Edvard Kolar; Mitija S Pavletič; Maja Smrdu; Almir Atiković
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Poor precompetitive sleep habits, nutrients' deficiencies, inappropriate body composition and athletic performance in elite gymnasts.

Authors:  M-R G Silva; T Paiva
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.050

10.  Influence of Workload and Recovery on Injuries in Elite Male Volleyball Players.

Authors:  Thiago Ferreira Timoteo; Paula Barreiros Debien; Bernardo Miloski; Francisco Zacaron Werneck; Tim Gabbett; Maurício Gattás Bara Filho
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.415

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sport Resource Classification Algorithm for Health Promotion Based on Cloud Computing: Rhythmic Gymnastics' Example.

Authors:  Tairan Zhang; Qing Han; Zhenji Zhang
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-07-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.