Elie Vesale1, Horace Roman2, Gaby Moawad3, Louise Benoit4, Cyril Touboul5, Emile Darai5, Sofiane Bendifallah5. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Vesale, Benoit, Touboul, Darai, and Bendifallah); Groupe de Recherche Clinique 6 (GRC6-UPMC): Centre Expert En Endométriose (C3E) (Drs. Vesale, Touboul, Darai, and Bendifallah); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Center of the Sud-Francilien, (Dr Vesale), Corbeil-Essonne, France. 2. Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux (Dr. Roman), France. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, (Dr. Moawad), Washington, District of Columbia. 4. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Vesale, Benoit, Touboul, Darai, and Bendifallah); UMR_S938, Sorbonne University, (Drs. Benoit, Touboul, Darai, and Bendifallah), Paris. Electronic address: louise.am.benoit@gmail.com. 5. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Drs. Vesale, Benoit, Touboul, Darai, and Bendifallah); Groupe de Recherche Clinique 6 (GRC6-UPMC): Centre Expert En Endométriose (C3E) (Drs. Vesale, Touboul, Darai, and Bendifallah); UMR_S938, Sorbonne University, (Drs. Benoit, Touboul, Darai, and Bendifallah), Paris.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Surgical management of deep endometriosis is associated with a high incidence of lower urinary tract dysfunction. The aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the rates of voiding dysfunction according to colorectal shaving, discoid excision, and segmental resection for deep endometriosis. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic review using bibliographic citations from PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Medical Subject Headings terms for colorectal endometriosis and voiding dysfunction were combined and restricted to the French and English languages. The final search was performed on August 28, 2019. The outcome measured was the occurrence of postoperative voiding dysfunction. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Study Quality Assessment Tools were used to assess the quality of included studies. Studies rated as good and fair were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of each included study, discrepancies were discussed; if consensus was not reached, a third reviewer was consulted. TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Out of 201 relevant published reports, 51 studies were ultimately reviewed systematically and 13 were included in the meta-analysis. Rectal shaving was statistically less associated with postoperative voiding dysfunction than segmental colorectal resection (Odds ratio [OR] 0.34; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.18-0.63; I2 = 0%; p <.001) or discoid excision (OR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51; I2 = 0%; p <.001). No significant difference was noted when comparing discoid excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.32-1.69; I2 = 29%; p = .47). Similarly, rectal shaving was associated with a lower risk of self-catheterization >1 month than segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.3; 95% CI, 0.14-0.66; I2 = 0%; p = .003). This outcome was no longer significant when comparing discoid excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.4-1.31; I2 = 63%; p = .28). CONCLUSION: Colorectal surgery for endometriosis has a significant impact on urinary function regardless of the technique. However, rectal shaving causes less postoperative voiding dysfunction than discoid excision or segmental resection.
OBJECTIVE: Surgical management of deep endometriosis is associated with a high incidence of lower urinary tract dysfunction. The aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the rates of voiding dysfunction according to colorectal shaving, discoid excision, and segmental resection for deep endometriosis. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic review using bibliographic citations from PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Medical Subject Headings terms for colorectal endometriosis and voiding dysfunction were combined and restricted to the French and English languages. The final search was performed on August 28, 2019. The outcome measured was the occurrence of postoperative voiding dysfunction. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Study Quality Assessment Tools were used to assess the quality of included studies. Studies rated as good and fair were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of each included study, discrepancies were discussed; if consensus was not reached, a third reviewer was consulted. TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Out of 201 relevant published reports, 51 studies were ultimately reviewed systematically and 13 were included in the meta-analysis. Rectal shaving was statistically less associated with postoperative voiding dysfunction than segmental colorectal resection (Odds ratio [OR] 0.34; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.18-0.63; I2 = 0%; p <.001) or discoid excision (OR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51; I2 = 0%; p <.001). No significant difference was noted when comparing discoid excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.32-1.69; I2 = 29%; p = .47). Similarly, rectal shaving was associated with a lower risk of self-catheterization >1 month than segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.3; 95% CI, 0.14-0.66; I2 = 0%; p = .003). This outcome was no longer significant when comparing discoid excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.4-1.31; I2 = 63%; p = .28). CONCLUSION:Colorectal surgery for endometriosis has a significant impact on urinary function regardless of the technique. However, rectal shaving causes less postoperative voiding dysfunction than discoid excision or segmental resection.
Authors: Manuel Maria Ianieri; Diego Raimondo; Andrea Rosati; Laura Cocchi; Rita Trozzi; Manuela Maletta; Antonio Raffone; Federica Campolo; Giuliana Beneduce; Antonio Mollo; Paolo Casadio; Ivano Raimondo; Renato Seracchioli; Giovanni Scambia Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 4.447