Literature DB >> 32730072

The eye-mind wandering link: Identifying gaze indices of mind wandering across tasks.

Myrthe Faber1, Kristina Krasich1, Robert E Bixler1, James R Brockmole1, Sidney K D'Mello2.   

Abstract

During mind wandering, visual processing of external information is attenuated. Accordingly, mind wandering is associated with changes in gaze behaviors, albeit findings are inconsistent in the literature. This heterogeneity obfuscates a complete view of the moment-to-moment processing priorities of the visual system during mind wandering. We hypothesize that this observed heterogeneity is an effect of idiosyncrasy across tasks with varying spatial allocation demands, visual processing demands, and discourse processing demands and reflects a strategic, compensatory shift in how the visual system operates during mind wandering. We recorded eye movements and mind wandering (via thought-probes) as 132 college-aged adults completed a battery of 7 short (6 min) tasks with different visual demands. We found that for tasks requiring extensive sampling of the visual field, there were fewer fixations, and, depending on the specific task, fixations were longer and/or more dispersed. This suggests that visual sampling is sparser and potentially slower and more dispersed to compensate for the decreased sampling rate during mind wandering. For tasks that demand centrally focused gaze, mind wandering was accompanied by more exploratory eye movements, such as shorter and more dispersed fixations as well as larger saccades. Gaze behaviors were not reliably associated with mind wandering during a film comprehension task. These findings provide insight into how the visual system prioritizes external information when attention is focused inward and indicates the importance of task demands when assessing the relationship between eye movements, visual processing, and mind wandering. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32730072     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  3 in total

1.  Using measures of reading time regularity (RTR) to quantify eye movement dynamics, and how they are shaped by linguistic information.

Authors:  Monika Tschense; Sebastian Wallot
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.004

2.  Does task-irrelevant music affect gaze allocation during real-world scene viewing?

Authors:  Kristina Krasich; Joanne Kim; Greg Huffman; Annika L Klaffehn; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-22

3.  Where the eyes wander: The relationship between mind wandering and fixation allocation to visually salient and semantically informative static scene content.

Authors:  Kristina Krasich; Greg Huffman; Myrthe Faber; James R Brockmole
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.