Literature DB >> 32730070

Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?

Adrian Staub1.   

Abstract

The time a reader's eyes spend on a word is influenced by visual (e.g., contrast) as well as lexical (e.g., word frequency) and contextual (e.g., predictability) factors. Well-known visual word recognition models predict that visual and higher-level manipulations may have interactive effects on early eye movement measures, because of cascaded processing between levels. Previous eye movement studies provide conflicting evidence as to whether they do, possibly because of inconsistent manipulations or limited statistical power. In the present study, 2 highly powered experiments used sentences in which a target word's frequency and predictability were factorially manipulated. Experiment 1 also manipulated visual contrast, and Experiment 2 also manipulated font difficulty. Robust main effects of all manipulations were evident in both experiments. In Experiment 1, interactions between the effect of contrast and the effects of frequency and predictability were numerically small and statistically unreliable in both early (word skipping, first fixation duration) and later (gaze duration, go-past time) measures. In Experiment 2, frequency and predictability did demonstrate convincing interactions with font difficulty, but only in the later measures, possibly implicating a checking mechanism. We conclude that although the predicted interactions in early eye movement measures may exist, they are sufficiently weak that they are difficult to detect even in large eye movement experiments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32730070     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  3 in total

1.  Predictability eliminates neighborhood effects during Chinese sentence reading.

Authors:  Panpan Yao; Adrian Staub; Xingshan Li
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-13

2.  Incremental Language Comprehension Difficulty Predicts Activity in the Language Network but Not the Multiple Demand Network.

Authors:  Leila Wehbe; Idan Asher Blank; Cory Shain; Richard Futrell; Roger Levy; Titus von der Malsburg; Nathaniel Smith; Edward Gibson; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.861

3.  Effects of word predictability on eye movements during Arabic reading.

Authors:  Maryam A AlJassmi; Kayleigh L Warrington; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.