Ocular films versus film-forming liquid systems for enhanced ocular drug delivery.

The short residence time, corneal barrier functions, and other effective eye protective mechanisms limited the ocular availability after topical application. Ocular inserts are being developed as polymer films for insertion into the conjunctival sac with the goal of increasing ocular availability. Unfortunately, these devices are not convenient for patients and are associated with many problems. The use of in situ gel/film-forming systems may provide promising alternative with comparable efficacy but this requires verification. Therefore, the current study compared ocular inserts with in situ film-forming liquids containing the same polymer components for ocular delivery of pilocarpine nitrate. Solvent casting technique was employed to prepare the inserts using and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as film-forming polymer blended with sodium alginate, as bioadhesive polymer. The effect of addition of either carboxymethycellulose, carbopol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, or methylcellulose was investigated. Solid-state characterization of the inserts indicated compatibility of the drug with film component. All inserts were of acceptable bioadhesive parameters and folding endurance that depended on the film composition. In vitro release studies reflected matrix diffusion kinetics for the film and liquid formulations. This confirms the in situ gelation of liquids. The calculated in vivo miotic pharmacokinetics parameters, using albino rabbits, reflected a better rank for the film but the difference was not statistically different from the in situ gel/film-forming systems. Ocular safety, as reflected by tear volume test, indicated acceptable safety of both liquid and inserts to the eye. The study suggested comparable efficacy of film-forming liquids to that of ocular films. Graphical abstract.