| Literature DB >> 32728638 |
Yvonne Annoon1, Thomas Hormenu1, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah2, Abdul-Aziz Seidu3,4, Edward Kwabena Ameyaw2, Francis Sambah1.
Abstract
Getting men to be actively involved in Antenatal Care (ANC) has been acknowledged by the World Health Organisation as a key indicator for better maternal health outcomes. We investigated the perception of women about barriers to male involvement in ANC in Sekondi, Ghana. Dwelling on cross-sectional design, we used a sample of 300 pregnant women (adolescents excluded) who had ever attended ANC in five fishing communities in Sekondi. The study was underpinned by a conceptual framework adapted from Doe's conceptual framework of male partner involvement in maternity care. We used questionnaire for the data collection. Both descriptive-frequencies and percentages; and inferential-binary logistic regression analyses were carried out. Seven out of ten (70%) participants indicated high male involvement in ANC. Respondents whose partners were aged 50-59 were less likely to report high male involvement in ANC compared to those whose partners were aged 20-29 years (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = [0.35-0.86], p = 0.03). Those living together with their partners were about two times more likely to report high male involvement in ANC compared to those who did not live with their partners (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = [1.18-3.19], p = 0.01). Participants who identified long waiting time at the health facility as a determinant of male involvement in ANC were less likely to report high male involvement in ANC compared to those who disagreed (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = [0.38-0.85], p = 0.01). The outcome of our study calls for male partner friendly policy driven environment at the various ANC visit points that would make men more comfortable to accompany their partners in accessing ANC services.Entities:
Keywords: Antenatal care; Education; Ghana; Health sciences; Male involvement; Perception; Public health; Quality of life; Sekondi; Sociology; Women's health
Year: 2020 PMID: 32728638 PMCID: PMC7381693 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Barriers to male involvement in ANC [20].
Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents.
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 20-29 | 106 | 35.3 |
| 30-39 | 127 | 42.3 |
| 40-49 | 67 | 22.3 |
| Marital Status | ||
| Married | 165 | 55.0 |
| Cohabiting | 93 | 31.0 |
| Separated/divorced | 42 | 14.0 |
| Educational level | ||
| Primary | 34 | 11.3 |
| Junior secondary | 148 | 49.3 |
| Senior secondary | 59 | 19.7 |
| Tertiary | 19 | 6.3 |
| No formal education | 40 | 13.3 |
| Occupation | ||
| Unemployed | 46 | 15.3 |
| Self-employed | 229 | 76.3 |
| Civil/public servant | 25 | 8.3 |
| Religion | ||
| Christianity | 284 | 94.7 |
| Other | 16 | 5.3 |
| Number of children | ||
| 1 child | 79 | 26.3 |
| 2–4 children | 178 | 59.3 |
| 5 or more children | 43 | 14.3 |
| Living with partner | ||
| No | 107 | 35.7 |
| Yes | 193 | 64.3 |
Figure 2Level of male involvement in ANC.
Socio-demographic barriers to male involvement in ANC
| Variables | Wald | B | OR | p-value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-29 | Ref | ||||
| 30-39 | 1.58 | -0.53 | 0.59 | 0.21 | 0.26–1.35 |
| 40-49 | 0.65 | -0.39 | 0.68 | 0.42 | 0.26–1.76 |
| 50-59 | 3.08 | -0.76 | 0.47 | 0.03∗∗ | 0.35–0.86 |
| Marital status of partner | |||||
| Married | Ref | ||||
| Cohabiting | 1.19 | -0.40 | 0.67 | 0.28 | 0.33–1.38 |
| Separated/Divorced | 4.85 | -1.05 | 0.35 | 0.03∗∗ | 0.14–0.89 |
| Educational level of partner | |||||
| No formal education | Ref | ||||
| Primary | 0.57 | 0.43 | 1.54 | 0.45 | 0.50–4.74 |
| JHS | 0.02 | 0.07 | 1.08 | 0.90 | 0.34–3.41 |
| SHS | 0.04 | 0.13 | 1.14 | 0.85 | 0.30–4.28 |
| Tertiary | 1.38 | -0.94 | 0.39 | 0.24 | 0.08–1.87 |
| Occupation of partner | |||||
| Unemployed | Ref | ||||
| Self-employed | 1.45 | -0.98 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 0.08–1.85 |
| Civil/Public servant | 0.17 | -0.36 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.13–3.79 |
| Religion of partner | |||||
| Christianity | Ref | ||||
| Other | 0.13 | -0.10 | 0.91 | 0.72 | 0.54–1.53 |
| No. of Children of partner | |||||
| 1 child | Ref | ||||
| 2–4 children | 0.06 | 0.09 | 1.09 | 0.81 | 0.53–2.26 |
| 5 or more children | 0.43 | -0.36 | 0.70 | 0.51 | 0.24–2.05 |
| Living with partner | |||||
| No | Ref | ||||
| Yes | 6.00 | 0.78 | 2.17 | 0.01∗∗ | 1.17–4.04 |
∗p < 0.10, ∗∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.01.
Socio-cultural barriers to male involvement in ANC
| Variables | Wald | B | OR | p-value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 0.65 | 0.31 | 1.36 | 0.42 | 0.64–2.88 |
| It is unacceptable for a man to carry out household chores for his wife when she is pregnant | |||||
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 4.79 | -1.02 | 0.36 | 0.03∗∗ | 0.15–0.90 |
| In our culture, men are prohibited from escorting their wives for ANC | |||||
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 3.23 | 1.44 | 4.23 | 0.07 | 0.88–20.3 |
| Even if a woman is pregnant, she still has to perform her normal duties in the home | |||||
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 0.13 | -0.10 | 0.91 | 0.72 | 0.54–1.53 |
| Husbands will be seen as being controlled by their partners if they escort their wives to ANC | |||||
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 5.56 | -0.80 | 0.45 | 0.02∗∗ | 0.23–0.88 |
∗p < 0.10, ∗∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.01.
Health facility barriers to male involvement in ANC
| Variables | Wald | B | OR | p-value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.41–2.12 |
| Long waiting time at the health facility does not allow men to accompany their partners for ANC | |||||
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 7.50 | -0.57 | 0.57 | 0.01∗∗ | 0.38–0.85 |
| Ridicule from health workers prevents husbands from accompanying their partners for ANC | |||||
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 0.35 | -0.22 | 0.80 | 0.56 | 0.38–1.68 |
| Not involving husbands in anything that occurs at the health facility during ANC makes them reluctant to accompany their partners to the facility | |||||
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 0.19 | 0.19 | 1.21 | 0.67 | 0.52–2.82 |
| Male partners do not have enough time to accompany their partners for repeated ANC visits | |||||
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 4.22 | -0.49 | 0.61 | 0.03∗∗ | 0.39–0.98 |
| Lack of space to accommodate male partners in ANC clinics makes it difficult for them to attend ANC with their partners | |||||
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 0.81 | 0.42 | 1.52 | 0.37 | 0.61–3.75 |
| Distance to health facilities makes it difficult for male partners to attend ANC with their partner | |||||
| Disagree | Ref | ||||
| Agree | 3.99 | 0.93 | 2.13 | 0.04∗∗ | 1.19–6.36 |
∗p < 0.10, ∗∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.01.