Literature DB >> 32728428

An alternative technique of restricted kinematic alignment of the femur and gap balanced alignment of the tibia using computer aided navigation.

N D Clement1, T Calliess2, B Christen2, D J Deehan3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alignment; Arthroplasty; Knee

Year:  2020        PMID: 32728428      PMCID: PMC7376307          DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.96.BJR-2020-0119.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint Res        ISSN: 2046-3758            Impact factor:   5.853


× No keyword cloud information.
The kinematic axis of the tibiofemoral joint[1] and the patellofemoral joint[2] passes through the distal femur. Therefore, when utilizing a single radii prosthesis it would seem optimal to align femoral component to the kinematic axes for the distal femur. Kinematic alignment would dictate that the tibial should also be aligned according to the patient’s morphology with true measured resection.[3] An alternative method would be to align the tibia component using intraoperative computer-aided gap balancing; the kinematically aligned femur is used as the fixed reference to create rectangular joint spaces firstly in extension then in flexion, which can be finetuned using tibial slope. The advent of computer navigation and robotic assisted knee surgery allows the surgeon to be precise within±1° and control the final alignment.[4] An additional advantage of robotic assisted surgery is that there is less damage to the soft tissue envelope,[5] which may help replicate knee kinematics, reduce postoperative pain, and improve early functional outcomes.[6,7] The authors describe a new technique of restricted kinematic alignment of the femoral component and using computer-aided gap balancing to align the tibial component. The femur is positioned using measured resection to maintain the centre of rotation of the knee matching the medial and lateral joint lines/contours and the trochlear groove (within±3° of the mechanical axis). Tibial resection is then dictated by the femoral prosthesis (gap balanced) aiming for equal extension and flexion gaps medially and laterally, allowing for a degree of varus or valgus to within±3° of the mechanical axis, which should not influence implant survival.[8,9] The authors feel it is key to restore the isometric medial compartment balance/gap in extension and flexion, but some laxity (increased gap) can be tolerated in the lateral compartment, for which there is evidence of improved patient outcomes.[10]
  9 in total

1.  Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Mark W Pagnano; Robert T Trousdale; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Kneeling kinematics after total knee arthroplasty: anterior-posterior contact position of a standard and a high-flex tibial insert design.

Authors:  Kathryn M Coughlin; Stephen J Incavo; Robert R Doohen; Kazuyoshi Gamada; Scott Banks; Bruce D Beynnon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The axes of rotation of the knee.

Authors:  A M Hollister; S Jatana; A K Singh; W W Sullivan; A G Lupichuk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Medial and lateral gap laxity differential in computer-assisted kinematic total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P McEwen; G Balendra; K Doma
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Implant Survival and Function Ten Years After Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Howell; Trevor J Shelton; Maury L Hull
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M J G Blyth; I Anthony; P Rowe; M S Banger; A MacLean; B Jones
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has a greater early functional outcome when compared to manual total knee arthroplasty for isolated medial compartment arthritis.

Authors:  N D Clement; A Bell; P Simpson; G Macpherson; J T Patton; D F Hamilton
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  Less iatrogenic soft-tissue damage utilizing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty when compared with a manual approach: A blinded assessment.

Authors:  Emily L Hampp; Nipun Sodhi; Laura Scholl; Matthew E Deren; Zachary Yenna; Geoffrey Westrich; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Robotic total knee arthroplasty: clinical outcomes and directions for future research.

Authors:  B Kayani; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Current concept of kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty and its derivatives.

Authors:  Takafumi Hiranaka; Yasuhito Suda; Akira Saitoh; Atsuki Tanaka; Akihiko Arimoto; Motoki Koide; Takaaki Fujishiro; Koji Okamoto
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-05

2.  Infographic: Three key elements of kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty for clarified understanding of its approaches.

Authors:  Takafumi Hiranaka; Yoshihito Suda; Akira Saitoh; Motoki Koide; Atsuki Tanaka; Akihiko Arimoto; Takaaki Fujishiro; Koji Okamoto
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  A Coronal Landmark for Tibial Component Positioning With Anatomical Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Radiological and Clinical Study.

Authors:  Tianlun Gong; Ruoyu Wang; Song Gong; Lizhi Han; Yihu Yi; Yuxiang Wang; Weihua Xu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-29

4.  Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a five-year prospective, multicentre, survivorship study.

Authors:  Ton Tran; Peter McEwen; Yi Peng; Adrian Trivett; Robert Steele; William Donnelly; Gavin Clark
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-08

Review 5.  Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junren Zhang; Wofhatwa Solomon Ndou; Nathan Ng; Paul Gaston; Philip M Simpson; Gavin J Macpherson; James T Patton; Nicholas D Clement
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.114

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.