| Literature DB >> 32727128 |
Jiawen Yang1,2, Qing Li1,2, Yu Li1,2.
Abstract
A comprehensive 3D-quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) pharmacophore model was constructed using the values of comprehensive biodegradation/photodegradation effects of 17 organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) evaluated by a normalization method to modify OPFRs with high biodegradation/photodegradation, taking tris(chloro-isopropyl) phosphate (TCPP), tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) and tris(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCIPP)-which occur frequently in the environment, and are the most difficult to degrade as target molecules. OPFR-derivative molecules TCPP-OH shows the highest improvement in biodegradation and photodegradation (55.48% and 46.37%, respectively). On simulating the biodegradation path and photodegradation path, it is found that the energy barrier of TCPP-OH for phosphate bond cleavage is reduced by 15.73% and 52.52% compared to TCPP after modification, respectively. Finally, in order to further significantly improve its biodegradability and photodegradation, the efficiency enhancement in the biodegradation and photodegradation of TCPP-OH are analyzed under the simulated environment by molecular dynamics and polarizable continuum model, respectively. The results of molecular dynamics show that the biodegradation efficiency of the TCPP-OH increased by 75.52% compared to TCPP. The UV spectral transition energy (4.07 eV) of TCPP-OH under the influence of hydrogen peroxide solvation effect is 44.23% lower than the actual transition energy (7.29 eV) of TCPP.Entities:
Keywords: 3D-QSAR pharmacophore model; biodegradation; molecular dynamics; normalization method; organophosphorus fire retardant; photodegradation; polarizable continuum model
Year: 2020 PMID: 32727128 PMCID: PMC7464776 DOI: 10.3390/polym12081672
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Comprehensive effect evaluation values of biodegradation and photodegradation of organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs).
| OPFRs | Biodegradation | Efficacy Coefficient | Photodegradation Energy | Efficacy Coefficient | Comprehensive Evaluation Values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCEP a | −123.731 | 1.168 | 7.2805 | 0.992 | 1.08 |
| TCIPP a | −144.537 | 1.000 | 7.2211 | 1.000 | 1.00 |
| TCPP a | −41.842 | 3.454 | 7.2874 | 0.991 | 2.22 |
| TDCIPP | −144.5 | 1.000 | 7.1323 | 0.988 | 0.99 |
| TDCPP a | −203.57 | 1.408 | 7.1821 | 0.995 | 1.20 |
| TPHP a | −190.952 | 1.321 | 5.4695 | 0.757 | 1.04 |
| EHDPP a | −196.153 | 1.357 | 5.4015 | 0.748 | 1.05 |
| TEP a | −219.226 | 1.517 | 5.3858 | 0.746 | 1.13 |
| TBOEP | −84.125 | 1.718 | 7.6896 | 0.939 | 1.33 |
| TEHP a | −268.708 | 1.859 | 8.2033 | 0.880 | 1.37 |
| TPrP a | −22.103 | 6.539 | 8.2739 | 0.873 | 3.71 |
| BdPhP a | −180.854 | 1.251 | 5.4003 | 0.748 | 1.00 |
| TMP a | −19.82 | 7.292 | 8.1823 | 0.883 | 4.09 |
| TiBP a | −148.43 | 1.027 | 8.1651 | 0.884 | 0.96 |
| TPeP a | −74.236 | 1.947 | 8.3083 | 0.869 | 1.41 |
| TnPP a | −9.191 | 15.726 | 8.1795 | 0.883 | 8.30 |
| TmTP | −219.036 | 1.515 | 5.2731 | 0.730 | 1.12 |
| TpTP | −259.422 | 1.795 | 5.2399 | 0.726 | 1.26 |
| TBPP a | −88.759 | 1.628 | 4.3292 | 0.600 | 1.11 |
| TiPP | −112.943 | 1.280 | 8.1537 | 0.886 | 1.08 |
| CDPP a | −208.576 | 1.443 | 5.3779 | 0.745 | 1.09 |
| IDPP a | −255.722 | 1.769 | 5.3928 | 0.747 | 1.26 |
The full name of abbreviations of OPFRs are shown at Abbreviation Index; a represents the 17 molecules as training set to obtain the pharmacophore model for comprehensive biodegradation/photodegradation effects of OPFRs.
Statistical parameters of the pharmacophore model for comprehensive biodegradation/photodegradation effects of OPFRs, constructed with Hypo-Gen.
| Model | 3D Space Relation of Hypo-Gen | Hypo No. | Total Cost | RMS | R2 | Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacophore model for comprehensive biodegradation/photodegradation effects |
| C1 | 70.55 | 0.24 | 0.90 | HBA HBA H |
| C2 | 75.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | HBA HBA H | ||
| C3 | 75.65 | 0.83 | 0.88 | HBA HBA H | ||
| C4 | 75.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | HBA H | ||
| C5 | 75.66 | 0.27 | 0.88 | HBA HBA H | ||
| C6 | 75.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | HBA HBA H | ||
| C7 | 75.78 | 0.29 | 0.87 | HBA HBA | ||
| C8 | 75.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | HBA HBA | ||
| C9 | 75.87 | 0.30 | 0.85 | HBA HBA | ||
| Configuration cost: | 16.75 | Fixed cost: | 57.18 | Null cost: | 77.39 |
HBA—hydrogen bond acceptor; H—hydrophobic; HA—hydrophobic-aliphatic; RA—aromatic ring.
Comprehensive evaluation value comparative results of HypoC1 and OPFR test sets.
| OPFRs | Fit Value | Estimate | Active | Error | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test set of comprehensive model HypoC1 | TDCIPP | 5.67 | 1.12 | 1.92 | 1.63 |
| TiPP | 5.68 | 1.35 | 0.98 | 1.07 | |
| TmTP | 5.67 | 1.54 | 0.98 | −1.28 | |
| TpTP | 5.64 | 1.65 | 1.34 | −1.26 | |
| TBOEP | 5.65 | 1.45 | 1.22 | 1.13 |
Optimal pharmacophore model parameters for biodegradation and photodegradation of OPFR molecules.
| Model Name | Active | Training Set | Test Set | Configuration | R2 | Total Cost | RMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HypoB1 | −log ΔGbind | TPeP, TMP, | TBPP | 13.24 | 0.77 | 48.17 | 0.03 |
| HypoP1 | Energy (eV) | TCEP, TCIPP, | EHDPP | 14.29 | 0.82 | 50.23 | 0.20 |
Figure 1Three-dimensional congruent map of Hypo C1 and TCPP, TCEP and TCIPP.
Figure 2Schematic diagrams of the substitution positions affecting the comprehensive biodegradation effect values of TCPP, TCEP and TCIPP.
Predicted values and variation degree of comprehensive and single biodegradation/photodegradation effect models of OPFR derivatives.
| Compound | Cpred | Fit Value | Reduction | Bpred | Increased | Ppred | Reduction | Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before modification | TCPP | 2.22 | - | - | 1.62 | - | 7.29 | - | - |
| After modification | TCPP–OH | 1.40 | 5.75 | 37.03% | 2.52 | 55.48% | 3.91 | 46.37% | 1.20 |
| TCPP–CH2OH | 1.24 | 5.82 | 44.06% | 2.31 | 42.43% | 3.43 | 52.98% | 0.80 | |
| TCPP–NH2 | 1.31 | 5.93 | 41.14% | 2.57 | 58.76% | 4.60 | 36.93% | 1.59 | |
| TCPP–COOH | 1.49 | 5.84 | 32.94% | 2.23 | 37.69% | 4.35 | 40.38% | 0.93 | |
| TCPP–CONH2 | 1.38 | 5.81 | 37.90% | 2.46 | 51.89% | 4.49 | 38.37% | 1.35 | |
| TCPP–CHO | 1.52 | 5.88 | 31.45% | 2.17 | 34.12% | 4.03 | 44.75% | 0.76 | |
| TCPP–PO3H2 | 1.39 | 5.85 | 37.38% | 2.17 | 33.88% | 4.02 | 44.88% | 0.75 | |
| TCPP–COOCH3 | 1.37 | 5.84 | 38.42% | 2.58 | 58.82% | 4.59 | 37.02% | 1.59 | |
| TCPP–SO3H | 1.39 | 5.85 | 37.30% | 2.17 | 33.77% | 4.67 | 35.98% | 0.94 | |
| Before modification | TCEP | 1.08 | - | - | 2.09 | - | 7.28 | - | - |
| After modification | TCEP–OH | 1.01 | 5.84 | 6.36% | 2.89 | 38.07% | 4.50 | 38.25% | 1.00 |
| TCEP–CH2OH | 0.90 | 5.87 | 16.70% | 3.06 | 46.38% | 3.57 | 50.99% | 0.91 | |
| TCEP–NH2 | 0.71 | 5.89 | 26.55% | 2.72 | 29.90% | 3.51 | 51.76% | 0.58 | |
| TCEP–COOH | 0.86 | 5.92 | 20.35% | 2.97 | 42.15% | 4.09 | 43.85% | 0.96 | |
| TCEP–CONH2 | 0.79 | 5.87 | 27.11% | 3.00 | 43.60% | 4.53 | 37.77% | 1.15 | |
| TCEP–CHO | 0.61 | 5.93 | 26.40% | 2.82 | 34.61% | 3.46 | 52.41% | 0.66 | |
| TCEP–PO3H2 | 1.01 | 5.97 | 6.46% | 3.01 | 43.98% | 4.95 | 31.99% | 1.37 | |
| TCEP–COOCH3 | 0.79 | 5.79 | 26.87% | 2.92 | 39.46% | 5.05 | 30.58% | 1.29 | |
| TCEP–SO3H | 0.85 | 5.91 | 21.08% | 3.11 | 48.68% | 3.78 | 48.03% | 1.01 |
Cpred, Bpred and Ppred represent the predicted values for comprehensive biodegradation/photodegradation effect, biodegradation effect and photodegradation effect pharmacophore models.
Date statistics of flame retardancy, energy value, insulation and frequency of 14 OPFR molecules.
| OPFR Derivatives | Flame Retardancy | Energy Gap | Energy | Freq | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | Enhanced Rate | Value | Change Rate (%) | Value | Change Rate (%) | Value | ||
| Before modification | TCPP | 225.72 | - | 5.38 | - | −1023.57 | - | 6.07 |
| After modification | TCPP–OH | 209.57 | 7.15% | 5.15 | −4.28% | −1536.08 | −50.07% | 2.34 |
| TCPP–CH2OH | 256.70 | −13.73% | 5.56 | 3.35% | −1626.53 | −58.91% | 2.16 | |
| TCPP–COOH | 294.37 | −30.42% | 5.42 | 0.74% | −1695.34 | −65.63% | 2.44 | |
| TCPP–CONH2 | 205.82 | 8.81% | 5.31 | −1.30% | −1563.15 | −52.72% | 2.70 | |
| TCPP–CHO | 215.94 | 4.33% | 5.68 | 5.58% | −1532.77 | −49.75% | 2.51 | |
| TCPP–PO3H2 | 201.83 | 10.58% | 5.39 | 0.19% | −1506.84 | −47.21% | 3.08 | |
| TCPP–SO3H | 266.90 | −18.24% | 5.18 | −3.72% | −1551.22 | −51.55% | 2.49 | |
| Before modification | TCEP | 273.03 | - | 6.64 | - | −1375.51 | - | 7.31 |
| After modification | TCEP–OH | 310.61 | −13.76% | 8.29 | 24.85% | −1475.55 | −7.27% | 5.89 |
| TCEP–CH2OH | 322.95 | −18.28% | 8.9 | 34.04% | −1395.67 | −1.47% | 4.67 | |
| TCEP–COOH | 327.24 | −19.85% | 8.14 | 22.59% | −1402.43 | −1.96% | 5.14 | |
| TCEP–CONH2 | 291.65 | −6.82% | 7.86 | 18.37% | −1433.19 | −4.19% | 5.28 | |
| TCEP–PO3H2 | 238.74 | 12.56% | 8.03 | 20.93% | −1452.28 | −5.58% | 4.72 | |
| TCEP–COOCH3 | 255.25 | 6.51% | 8.42 | 26.81% | −1466.84 | −6.64% | 5.49 | |
| TCEP–SO3H | 270.96 | 0.76% | 8.34 | 25.60% | −1467.63 | −6.70% | 5.64 | |
Figure 3Proposed biodegradation pathway of TCPP before (a) and after modification (b).
Figure 4Proposed photodegradation pathways of TCPP before (A) and after modification (B).
Effect of the combination of external conditions on the biodegradation system of degrading enzyme and TCPP–OH.
| Experiment No. | pH | Temperature | Methyl Alcohol | Acetic Acid | H2O2 | Voltage | Surfactant | ΔGbind |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.5 | 298 | 400 | 200 | 300 | 0.5 | 0 | −88.461 |
| 2 | 6.5 | 298 | 400 | 200 | 350 | 1 | 375 | −77.231 |
| 3 | 6.5 | 298 | 400 | 200 | 400 | 1.5 | 750 | −76.508 |
| 4 | 6.5 | 303 | 450 | 300 | 300 | 0.5 | 0 | −75.584 |
| 5 | 6.5 | 303 | 450 | 300 | 350 | 1 | 375 | −84.364 |
| 6 | 6.5 | 303 | 450 | 300 | 400 | 1.5 | 750 | −90.252 |
| 7 | 6.5 | 308 | 500 | 400 | 300 | 0.5 | 0 | −90.39 |
| 8 | 6.5 | 308 | 500 | 400 | 350 | 1 | 375 | −75.769 |
| 9 | 6.5 | 308 | 500 | 400 | 400 | 1.5 | 750 | −82.256 |
| 10 | 7.5 | 298 | 450 | 400 | 300 | 1 | 750 | −80.197 |
| 11 | 7.5 | 298 | 450 | 400 | 350 | 1.5 | 0 | −69.418 |
| 12 | 7.5 | 298 | 450 | 400 | 400 | 0.5 | 375 | −70.905 |
| 13 | 7.5 | 303 | 500 | 200 | 300 | 1 | 750 | −103.79 |
| 14 | 7.5 | 303 | 500 | 200 | 350 | 1.5 | 0 | −84.974 |
| 15 | 7.5 | 303 | 500 | 200 | 400 | 0.5 | 375 | −65.508 |
| 16 | 7.5 | 308 | 400 | 300 | 300 | 1 | 750 | −82.256 |
| 17 | 7.5 | 308 | 400 | 300 | 350 | 1.5 | 0 | −60.265 |
| 18 | 7.5 | 308 | 400 | 300 | 400 | 0.5 | 375 | −58.644 |
| 19 | 8.5 | 298 | 500 | 300 | 300 | 1.5 | 375 | −78.007 |
| 20 | 8.5 | 298 | 500 | 300 | 350 | 0.5 | 750 | −62.709 |
| 21 | 8.5 | 298 | 500 | 300 | 400 | 1 | 0 | −87.278 |
| 22 | 8.5 | 303 | 400 | 400 | 300 | 1.5 | 375 | −74.697 |
| 23 | 8.5 | 303 | 400 | 400 | 350 | 0.5 | 750 | −67.101 |
| 24 | 8.5 | 303 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 1 | 0 | −85.287 |
| 25 | 8.5 | 308 | 450 | 200 | 300 | 1.5 | 375 | −88.545 |
| 26 | 8.5 | 308 | 450 | 200 | 350 | 0.5 | 750 | −62.199 |
| 27 | 8.5 | 308 | 450 | 200 | 400 | 1 | 0 | −55.286 |
Figure 5Main effect diagram for the average binding free energy value of degrading enzyme and TCPP–OH based on L27 (37) Taguchi experimental design.
Ranking result for the external conditions of biodegradation of degrading enzyme and TCPP–OH molecule based on L27 (37) Taguchi experiment design.
| Factors/Levels | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −82.31 | −76.75 | −74.49 | −78.06 | −84.66 | −71.28 | −77.44 |
| 2 | −75.11 | −81.28 | −75.19 | −75.48 | −71.56 | −81.27 | −74.85 |
| 3 | −73.46 | −72.85 | −81.19 | −77.34 | −74.66 | −78.32 | −78.59 |
| Ranking | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
Figure 6Diagram for the comparison of biodegradation efficiency of TCPP–OH using (a) biodegradation pharmacophore model prediction and (b) molecular dynamic simulation.